Decision-making in Cognitively Unimpaired Illiterate and Low-educated Older Women: Results on the Iowa Gambling Task

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
8
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2017
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
Citação
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, v.32, n.1, p.71-80, 2017
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objective: This study investigated the pattern of decision-making (DM) on the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) in a sample of Portuguese speaking healthy older women in Brazil with limited education: illiterate, 1-2 years, and 3-4 years of schooling. Methods: Around 164 non-demented community-dwelling women participated in the study. Among them 60 were illiterate, 52 had 1-2 years of schooling and 52 had 3-4 years of schooling. Participants completed the instruments: Brief Cognitive Screening Battery (BCSB), Mini-Mental State Examination, Verbal Fluency Test (animal category), Clock Drawing Test, Geriatric Depression Scale, Geriatric Anxiety Inventory, Digit Span Forward and Backward, Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, and IGT. Results: The three education groups were equivalent as to age, number of diseases, medications taken daily, depression, and anxiety symptoms. In the IGT the literate older adults made more advantageous choices than the illiterate and IGT performance improved linearly with higher levels of education. IGT performance correlated significantly with all cognitive test scores with the exception of the memorization of the pictures on the BCSB. Conclusion: The results suggested that education influences IGT performance, with worse scores among the illiterate. Results may be used by clinicians to interpret IGT performance among seniors with low literacy levels.
Palavras-chave
Iowa Gambling Task, Decision-making, Aging, Illiteracy, Low education
Referências
  1. Alves Gilberto Sousa, 2006, Rev. psiquiatr. Rio Gd. Sul, V28, P330, DOI 10.1590/S0101-81082006000300012
  2. Angelini A. L., 1999, MANUAL MATRIZES PROG
  3. Aprahamian I, 2010, INT PSYCHOGERIATR, V22, P64, DOI 10.1017/S1041610209991141
  4. Ardila A, 2000, ARCH CLIN NEUROPSYCH, V15, P495, DOI 10.1016/S0887-6177(99)00040-2
  5. Ardila A, 2010, ARCH CLIN NEUROPSYCH, V25, P689, DOI 10.1093/arclin/acq079
  6. Arenaza-Urquijo EM, 2013, NEUROIMAGE, V83, P450, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.053
  7. Bakos Daniela Schneider, 2010, Psychol. Neurosci., V3, P101, DOI 10.3922/j.psns.2010.1.013
  8. Bechara A, 2004, NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, V18, P152, DOI 10.1037/0894-4105.18.1.152
  9. BECHARA A, 1994, COGNITION, V50, P7, DOI 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3
  10. Bechara A., 2007, IOWA GAMBLING TASK I
  11. Bolla KI, 2004, CEREB CORTEX, V14, P1226, DOI 10.1093/cercor/bhh083
  12. Brand M, 2007, J CLIN EXP NEUROPSYC, V29, P86, DOI 10.1080/13803390500507196
  13. Brevers D, 2013, FRONT PSYCHOL, V4, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00665
  14. Brucki SMD, 2003, ARQ NEURO-PSIQUIAT, V61, P777, DOI 10.1590/S0004-282X2003000500014
  15. Carvalho JG, 2010, THESIS
  16. Castells Maria Alicia, 2005, Rev. Bras. Psiquiatr., V27, P54, DOI 10.1590/S1516-44462005000100012
  17. Crone EA, 2005, CHILD NEUROPSYCHOL, V11, P245, DOI 10.1080/092970490911261
  18. Crone EA, 2004, DEV NEUROPSYCHOL, V25, P251, DOI 10.1207/s15326942dn2503_2
  19. Damasio A., 1996, ERRO DESCARTES EMOCA
  20. Davis C, 2008, J INT NEUROPSYCH SOC, V14, P1063, DOI 10.1017/S1355617708081204
  21. Denburg NL, 2007, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1121, P480, DOI 10.1196/annals.1401.031
  22. Denburg NL, 2006, INT J PSYCHOPHYSIOL, V61, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.10.021
  23. Dunn BD, 2006, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V30, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.07.001
  24. Evans CEY, 2004, BRAIN COGNITION, V54, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.022
  25. Fein G, 2007, J INT NEUROPSYCH SOC, V13, P480, DOI 10.1017/S135561770707052X
  26. Fratiglioni L, 2004, LANCET NEUROL, V3, P343, DOI 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00767-7
  27. Fry J, 2009, S AFR J PSYCHOL, V39, P122
  28. Gansler DA, 2011, ARCH CLIN NEUROPSYCH, V26, P706, DOI 10.1093/arclin/acr082
  29. Holtzer R, 2009, J NEUROL SCI, V281, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.jns.2009.02.360
  30. Huizenga HM, 2007, DEVELOPMENTAL SCI, V10, P814, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00621.x
  31. Isella V, 2008, BEHAV NEUROL, V19, P59
  32. Johnson EE, 1997, PSYCHOL REP, V80, P83, DOI 10.2466/PR0.80.1.83-88
  33. Malloy-Diniz LF, 2008, REV BRAS PSIQUIATR, V30, P144, DOI 10.1590/S1516-44462008005000009
  34. Massena PN, 2015, INT PSYCHOGERIATR, V27, P1113, DOI 10.1017/S1041610214001021
  35. Nascimento E, 2004, WAIS 3 MANUAL ADM AV
  36. Nitrini R, 2004, J INT NEUROPSYCH SOC, V10, P634, DOI 10.1017/S1355617704104062
  37. Carvalho JCN, 2012, SPAN J PSYCHOL, V15, P480, DOI 10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n2.38858
  38. Ostrosky-Solis F, 1998, ARCH CLIN NEUROPSYCH, V13, P645, DOI 10.1016/S0887-6177(97)00094-2
  39. Overman WH, 2004, BRAIN COGNITION, V55, P134, DOI 10.1016/s0278-2626(03)00279-3
  40. Paradela EMP, 2005, REV SAUDE PUBL, V39, P918, DOI 10.1590/s0034-89102005000600008
  41. Reuter-Lorenz PA, 2014, NEUROPSYCHOL REV, V24, P355, DOI 10.1007/s11065-014-9270-9
  42. Rodrigues P. M. A., 2012, OIKOS REV BRASILEIRA, V23, P18
  43. Sakagami M, 1999, NEUROSCI RES, V34, P79, DOI 10.1016/S0168-0102(99)00038-3
  44. Salthouse TA, 2010, J INT NEUROPSYCH SOC, V16, P754, DOI 10.1017/S1355617710000706
  45. Sanchez Maria Angélica dos Santos, 2011, Dement. neuropsychol., V5, P322, DOI 10.1590/S1980-57642011DN05040010
  46. Schneider Daniela Di Giorgio, 2006, Psicol. Reflex. Crit., V19, P442, DOI 10.1590/S0102-79722006000300013
  47. SHULMAN KI, 1993, INT J GERIATR PSYCH, V8, P487, DOI 10.1002/gps.930080606
  48. Stern Y, 2009, NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, V47, P2015, DOI 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.004
  49. Trentini C. M., 2010, TESTE WISCONSIN CLAS
  50. van den Bos R, 2013, BEHAV BRAIN RES, V238, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.10.002
  51. Verdejo-Garcia A, 2007, DRUG ALCOHOL DEPEN, V91, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.05.025