Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a Quality of Life questionnaire: The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation questionnaire
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
51
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2011
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
INT RHINOLOGIC SOC
Autores
PADUA, Francini G. M.
STEWART, Michael G.
Citação
RHINOLOGY, v.49, n.2, p.227-231, 2011
Resumo
Background:The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) instrument is a disease-specific questionnaire for assessing the outcome of an intervention in nasal obstruction in trials. This instrument is only available in the English language and cross-culturally valid questionnaires are very important for all research, including nasal obstruction. The aim of the current study was to reproduce the cross-cultural adaptation process for the NOSE questionnaire in the Portuguese language (NOSE-p). Methodology: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the instrument were divided into two stages. Stage I involved four bilingual professionals, an expert committee and the author of the original instrument. In Stage 2, the NOSE-p was tested on 33 patients undergoing septoplasty for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity. discriminant validity, criterion validity, and response sensitivity. Results: The cross-cultural adaptation process was completed and the NOSE-p was demonstrated to be a valid instrument with satisfactory construct validity. It showed an adequate internal consistency reliability and adequate test-retest reliability. It could discriminate between patients with and without nasal obstruction and it has a high response sensitivity to change. Conclusions: The cross-cultural adaptation and validation process demonstrated to be valid and the NOSE-p proved to be applicable in Brazil.
Palavras-chave
nasal obstruction/diagnosis, quality of life, validation studies, outcome assessment (health care), health status indicators
Referências
- Most SP, 2006, ARCH FACIAL PLAST S, V8, P306, DOI 10.1001/archfaci.8.5.306
- Siegel NS, 2000, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V122, P228, DOI 10.1016/S0194-5998(00)70244-0
- Beaton DE, 2000, SPINE, V25, P3186, DOI 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
- Fokkens W, 2007, RHINOLOGY, V45, P97
- GLIKLICH RE, 1995, LARYNGOSCOPE, V105, P387, DOI 10.1288/00005537-199504000-00010
- Stewart MG, 2004, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V130, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.otohns.2003.09.016
- Benninger MS, 1997, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V123, P1175
- Stewart MG, 2004, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V130, P283, DOI 10.1016/j.otohns.2003.12.004
- Rhee JS, 2005, LARYNGOSCOPE, V115, P437, DOI 10.1097/01.mlg.0000157831.46250
- Piccirillo JF, 2002, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V126, P41, DOI 10.1067/mhn.2002.121022
- Stewart MG, 2005, AM J RHINOL, V19, P529
- Jessen M, 1997, ALLERGY, V52, P3
- van Oene CM, 2007, ALLERGY, V62, P1359, DOI 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01482.x
- Pirila T, 2001, AM J RHINOL, V15, P127, DOI 10.2500/105065801781543664
- JUNIPER EF, 1991, CLIN EXP ALLERGY, V21, P77, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1991.tb00807.x
- Arunachalam PS, 2001, CLIN OTOLARYNGOL, V26, P367, DOI 10.1046/j.0307-7772.2001.00481.x
- Badia Xavier, 2004, Health Qual Life Outcomes, V2, P13, DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-2-13
- Boynton PM, 2004, BRIT MED J, V328, P1312, DOI 10.1136/bmj.328.7451.1312
- Harrill WC, 2007, LARYNGOSCOPE, V117, P1912, DOI 10.1097/MLG.0b013e3181271414
- Kemker BJ, 1999, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V121, P603, DOI 10.1016/S0194-5998(99)70065-3
- Puhan Milo A, 2005, Health Qual Life Outcomes, V3, P33, DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-3-33
- SAMAD I, 1992, J OTOLARYNGOL, V21, P88