The Study of Attenuation Levels and the Comfort of Earplugs

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
15
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2018
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS & MEDIA PVT LTD
Citação
NOISE & HEALTH, v.20, n.94, p.112-119, 2018
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Introduction: This study aimed to analyze and compare four different types of earplugs, divided into premolded plugs and foam plug models, in relation to the level of attenuation, comfort, and the size of the external acoustic meatus (EAM) in an attempt to identify how these variables influence the choice of specific hearing protection devices (HPDs). Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was performed in a sample of 49 participants, oriented toward the ideal placement of four HPDs, two premolded and two foam plugs (3M (TM)). The procedures included otoscopy, EAM diameter measurement using an otometer, EAM volume measurement via an acoustic impedance test, and the obtainment of the bilateral personal attenuation rating (PAR) for each HPD using the E-A-Rfit (TM) Validation System (3M (TM)). The Bipolar Comfort Rating Scale (BCRS) instrument was applied twice for each individual: once after the evaluations with the premolded HPDs and again after the evaluations with the foam plug HPDs. Then, each participant was asked which was his/her favorite protector. Results: The volume of the EAM was not directly related to the diameter of the EAM. The attenuation did not interfere with the HPD preference, and the PAR of the foam plug was significantly higher regardless of the preferred HPD. Regarding the BCRS, the variables ""Placement,"" ""Complexity,"" and ""Occlusion Effect"" had higher scores for premolded HPDs and had a direct relationship with the type of preferred HPD. Conclusion: Attention to the use of HPDs should be personalized, taking into account the needs of each individual, considering not only the attenuation, but also the user's reported well-being.
Palavras-chave
Attenuation, comfort, earplugs, fit test, hearing protection devices
Referências
  1. Alali K, 2012, WORK, V41, P3599, DOI 10.3233/WOR-2012-0671-3599
  2. Arezes PM, 2002, ANN OCCUP HYG, V46, P531, DOI 10.1093/annhyg/mef067
  3. Arezes PM, 1999, 2 INT C ERG COMM OCC
  4. Augusto Neto N, 2007, THESIS
  5. Behar A, 2007, HEARING REV
  6. BERGER EH, 1986, J ACOUST SOC AM, V79, P1655, DOI 10.1121/1.393228
  7. Berger EH, 1998, J ACOUST SOC AM, V103, P665, DOI 10.1121/1.423236
  8. Berger EH, 1993, EARLOG 20 NAKED TRUT
  9. Bockstael A, 2015, NOISE HEALTH, V17, P198, DOI 10.4103/1463-1741.160688
  10. Bockstael A, 2013, INT J IND ERGONOM, V43, P512, DOI 10.1016/j.ergon.2012.08.009
  11. Bogoch II, 2005, CAN J PUBLIC HEALTH, V96, P69
  12. Byrne DC, 2011, NOISE HEALTH, V13, P86, DOI 10.4103/1463-1741.77193
  13. Casali J. G., 1987, Sound and Vibration, V21, P10
  14. Casali JG, 2004, HUM FACTORS, V46, P1, DOI 10.1518/hfes.46.1.1.30387
  15. Chiou WK, 2016, ADV INTELL SYST, V491, P163, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-41929-9_16
  16. Daniell WE, 2006, OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V63, P343, DOI 10.1136/oem.2005.024588
  17. Davis RR, 2008, NOISE HEALTH, V10, P83, DOI 10.4103/1463-1741.44346
  18. Groenewold MR, 2014, AM J IND MED, V57, P1001, DOI 10.1002/ajim.22323
  19. Hager LD, 2011, NOISE HEALTH, V13, P147, DOI 10.4103/1463-1741.77217
  20. IVERGARD TBK, 1976, AM IND HYG ASSOC J, V37, P139, DOI 10.1080/0002889768507436
  21. Lee K, 2011, P HUM FACT ERG SOC 5
  22. Morata T.C., 2001, NOISE HEALTH, V4, P25
  23. Morata TC, 2005, EAR HEARING, V26, P529, DOI 10.1097/01.aud.0000188148.97046.b8
  24. NILSSON R, 1980, SCAND AUDIOL, P204
  25. Noise Gerges SN., 2000, NOISE FUNDAMENTALS C
  26. PARK MY, 1991, APPL ACOUST, V34, P151, DOI 10.1016/0003-682X(91)90082-P
  27. Riffel G, 2001, THESIS
  28. Rodrigues Marleide Aparecida Griggio, 2006, Rev. CEFAC, V8, P543, DOI 10.1590/S1516-18462006000400016
  29. Schulz G, 1983, Z Gesamte Hyg, V29, P93
  30. Tantranont K, 2017, WORKPLACE HLTH SAF, V20, P1
  31. Toivonen M, 2002, ANN OCCUP HYG, V46, P527, DOI 10.1093/annhyg/mef065
  32. Tsukada T, 2008, IND HEALTH, V46, P393, DOI 10.2486/indhealth.46.393
  33. Williams SC, 2012, ANN OCCUP HYG, V56, P925, DOI 10.1093/annhyg/mes028
  34. Yu JF, 2015, APPL ERGON, V50, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.01.008
  35. Zheng Yun, 2007, J Occup Environ Hyg, V4, P87, DOI 10.1080/15459620601115768