Effect of ductus deferens lavage on the time to achieve azoospermia in patients undergoing vasectomy
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
1
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2018
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
HOSPITAL CLINICAS, UNIV SAO PAULO
Autores
OLIVEIRA, Francisco Barros de
OLIVEIRA, Fernando Rocha
ABREU, Luiz Carlos de
DABOIN, Blanca Elena Guerrero
NORBERTO, Alex Rey
SOUSA, Luiz Vinicius de Alcantara
TAVARES, Luis Fernando B.
GLINA, Sidney
Citação
CLINICS, v.73, article ID UNSP e504, 5p, 2018
Resumo
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of normal saline lavage of the distal vas deferens ampulla in patients undergoing vasectomy on the time to achieve azoospermia. METHODS: A prospective randomized study of 60 men divided into two groups, group lavage (GL, n=30) in which distal vas deferens ampulla lavage was performed with 10 ml of normal saline during the vasectomy, and group without lavage (GWL, n=30) in which control patients received only a vasectomy. The patients provided sperm for semen analysis at the 5 th, 10 th, 15 th, 20 th and 25 th ejaculations. RESULTS: Fifteen participants in GL and 16 in GWL, for a total of 31 patients, were excluded due to not completing the control spermiogram. The tests carried out at the five ejaculations showed immobile spermatozoa in 40 and 85.71%, 66.67 and 78.57%, 93.33 and 85.71%, 86.67 and 71.43%, and 93.33 and 85.71% of participants in GL and GWL, respectively. CONCLUSION: Vas deferens duct lavage with 10 ml of normal saline during vasectomy did not decrease the time required to achieve postoperative azoospermia.
Palavras-chave
Vasectomy, Sterilization, Irrigation, Contraception
Referências
- ALBERT PS, 1978, FERTIL STERIL, V29, P442
- Badrakumar C, 2000, BJU INT, V86, P479, DOI 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2000.00781.x
- Barbara HE, 2011, TECNICAS BASICAS LAB, P599
- Barone MA, 2003, J UROLOGY, V170, P892, DOI 10.1097/01.ju.0000075505.08215.28
- BENGER JR, 1995, BRIT J UROL, V76, P376
- BERTHELSEN JG, 1976, SCAND J UROL NEPHROL, V10, P100, DOI 10.3109/00365597609179666
- Cook LA, 2014, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V30
- CRAFT I, 1972, LANCET, V1, P515
- DAVIES AH, 1990, BRIT J UROL, V66, P211, DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1990.tb14907.x
- DeKnijff DWW, 1997, FERTIL STERIL, V67, P332, DOI 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81920-6
- EDWARDS IS, 1979, BRIT MED J, V1, P1019, DOI 10.1136/bmj.1.6169.1019-c
- EDWARDS IS, 1976, MED J AUSTRALIA, V1, P1021
- Eisner B, 2004, ANN FAM MED, V2, P221, DOI 10.1370/afm.59
- ERREY BB, 1977, MED J AUSTRALIA, V1, P642
- FREUND M, 1969, FERTIL STERIL, V20, P163
- Griffin T, 2005, J UROLOGY, V174, P29, DOI 10.1097/01.ju.0000161595.82642.fc
- HAMILTON DW, 1977, MED J AUSTRALIA, V1, P402
- HENRYYU HY, 1976, BRIT J UROL, V48, P371
- JOUANNET P, 1978, FERTIL STERIL, V29, P435
- LEHTONEN T, 1975, ANN CHIR GYNAECOL FE, V64, P224
- Leungwattanakij S, 2001, INT J ANDROL, V24, P241, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2605.2001.00290.x
- LEWIS EL, 1984, FERTIL STERIL, V42, P895
- MARWOOD RP, 1979, BRIT MED J, V1, P87, DOI 10.1136/bmj.1.6156.87
- Mason RG, 2002, UROLOGY, V59, P424, DOI 10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01566-7
- Mason RG, 2001, BJU INT, V88, P9
- OBRIEN TS, 1995, BRIT J UROL, V76, P371, DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1995.tb07717.x
- Pearce I, 2002, BJU INT, V90, P282, DOI 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2002.02847.x
- PHILP T, 1984, BRIT J UROL, V56, P745, DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1984.tb06161.x
- Roshani Ali, 2008, Urol J, V5, P37
- Singh D, 2010, UROLOGY, V76, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2010.01.091
- Wood BL, 2003, CONTRACEPTION, V67, P241, DOI 10.1016/S0010-7824(02)00515-2