Clinical viability of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
23
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2018
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
Autores
BATISTA, V. E. de Souza
SANTIAGO JR., J. F.
SONEGO, M. V.
VERRI, F. R.
SANTOS, D. M. dos
GOIATO, M. C.
PELLIZZER, E. P.
Citação
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, v.47, n.9, p.1166-1177, 2018
Resumo
The aim of this meta-analysis was to verify the clinical viability of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures (SIMO). An electronic search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed (end date July 2017); this was supplemented by a manual search of the literature. Only prospective clinical trials and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated SIMO with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were included. The meta-analysis was based on the Mantel Haenszel method. Dental implant and prosthetic failure were the dichotomous outcome measures; these were evaluated through the risk ratio (RR) and odds ratio (OR), with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Of 499 articles identified, nine fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A total of 205 implants were placed in patients with a mean age of 64.1 years; the cumulative survival rate was 96.6% over a mean follow-up period of 37.3 months. The procedure used (SIMO vs. two implant-retained mandibular overdenture) did not affect dental implant failure (P = 0.45) or prosthetic failure (P = 0.65): RR 1.06 (95% CI 0.91-1.23) and RR 0.88 (95% CI 0.51-1.51), respectively; OR 2.56 (95% CI 0.27-24.39; P = 0.41) and OR 0.44 (95% CI 0.15-1.26; P = 0.13), respectively. Within the limitations of this systematic review and meta analysis, SIMO with a complete denture as the opposing arch may be considered an alternative treatment for completely edentulous patients. However, this study also confirmed the need for more RCTs on this topic.
Palavras-chave
overdenture, dental implant, single implant, meta-analysis
Referências
- Alqutaibi AY, 2017, INT J ORAL MAX SURG, V46, P789, DOI 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.02.001
- Alqutaibi AY, 2016, J EVID-BASED DENT PR, V16, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.jebdp.2016.01.009
- Alsabeeha N, 2010, INT J PROSTHODONT, V23, P160
- Alsabeeha N, 2009, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V20, P356, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01666.x
- Alsabeeha NHM, 2011, INT J PROSTHODONT, V24, P247
- Alsabeeha NHM, 2011, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V22, P330, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02004.x
- Alsabeeha NHM, 2010, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V21, P563, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01890.x
- Bhat Srinidhi, 2016, J Indian Prosthodont Soc, V16, P182, DOI 10.4103/0972-4052.176522
- Borenstein M, 2010, RES SYNTH METHODS, V1, P97, DOI 10.1002/jrsm.12
- Bryant SR, 2015, J DENT RES, V94, P36, DOI 10.1177/0022034514554224
- Bueno-Samper A, 2010, MED ORAL PATOL ORAL, V15, pE375, DOI 10.4317/medoral.15.e375
- Chappuis V, 2013, CLIN IMPLANT DENT R, V15, P780, DOI 10.1111/cid.12056
- Cheng T, 2012, J DENT, V40, P1018, DOI 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.08.011
- Cordioli C, 1997, J PROSTHET DENT, V78, P159
- Cordioli G P, 1993, Minerva Stomatol, V42, P469
- Cvetanovich GL, 2014, ARTHROSCOPY, V30, P1616, DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.05.040
- Duval S, 2000, BIOMETRICS, V56, P455, DOI 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
- El-Sheikh AM, 2012, INT J DENT, DOI 10.1155/2012/236409
- Feine J S, 2002, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V17, P601
- Gonda T, 2010, J PROSTHET DENT, V103, P178, DOI 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60026-1
- Grover M, 2014, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V25, P580, DOI 10.1111/clr.12111
- Harder S, 2011, J DENT, V39, P656, DOI 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.07.007
- Harel N, 2013, INT J PROSTHODONT, V26, P244, DOI 10.11607/ijp.3044
- Ismail Hussien Abdelfattah, 2015, J Int Oral Health, V7, P4
- Jadad AR, 1996, CONTROL CLIN TRIALS, V17, P1, DOI 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4
- John Jins, 2012, J Indian Prosthodont Soc, V12, P37, DOI 10.1007/s13191-012-0114-0
- Kern M, 2012, IMPLANTOLOGIE, V20, P23
- Kono K, 2014, IMPLANT DENT, V23, P456, DOI 10.1097/ID.0000000000000099
- Krennmair G, 2001, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V16, P98
- Kronstrom M, 2017, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V32, P128, DOI 10.11607/jomi.4824
- Kronstrom M, 2014, CLIN IMPLANT DENT R, V16, P323, DOI 10.1111/cid.12006
- Kronstrom M, 2010, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V25, P181
- Lahoti Krishnakumar, 2016, Indian J Dent Res, V27, P597, DOI 10.4103/0970-9290.199587
- LANDIS JR, 1977, BIOMETRICS, V33, P159, DOI 10.2307/2529310
- Lee DJ, 2011, INT J PROSTHODONT, V24, P71
- Liddelow G, 2010, INT J PROSTHODONT, V23, P13
- Liddelow GJ, 2007, J PROSTHET DENT, V97, pS126, DOI 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60016-X
- Liu JY, 2013, J DENT, V41, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.11.008
- Nascimento JFM, 2015, J PROSTHODONT, V24, P538, DOI 10.1111/jopr.12269
- Maeda Y, 2008, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V19, P271, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01425.x
- Mahoorkar Sudhindra, 2016, J Indian Prosthodont Soc, V16, P75, DOI 10.4103/0972-4052.164881
- Moher D, 2009, ANN INTERN MED, V151, P264, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
- Muller F, 2012, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V23, P144, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02213.x
- Mundt T, 2017, CLIN ORAL INVEST, V21, P635, DOI 10.1007/s00784-016-1930-0
- Nischal K, 2016, CASE REP DENT, V2016
- Nogueira TE, 2016, TRIALS, V17, DOI 10.1186/s13063-016-1646-0
- Passia N, 2017, J ORAL REHABIL, V44, P213, DOI 10.1111/joor.12473
- Passia N, 2017, INT J PROSTHODONT, V30, P43, DOI 10.11607/ijp.4975
- Passia N, 2015, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V26, P1191, DOI 10.1111/clr.12427
- Passia N, 2014, CLIN ORAL INVEST, V18, P1719, DOI 10.1007/s00784-014-1248-8
- Passia N, 2014, TRIALS, V15, DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-186
- Plint AC, 2006, MED J AUSTRALIA, V185, P263
- Schneider GB, 2011, SPEC CARE DENT, V31, P138, DOI 10.1111/j.1754-4505.2011.00196.x
- Srinivasan M, 2016, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V27, P63, DOI 10.1111/clr.12513
- Tavakolizadeh S, 2015, J ADV PROSTHODONT, V7, P191, DOI 10.4047/jap.2015.7.3.191
- Walton JN, 2009, INT J PROSTHODONT, V22, P331
- Wolfart S, 2008, QUINTESSENCE INT, V39, P541