Supraclavicular flap as a salvage procedure in reconstruction of head and neck complex defects

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
6
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Citação
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, v.72, n.4, p.E9-E14, 2019
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
The supraclavicular island flap (SCIF) is an interesting therapeutic option in head and neck reconstruction. Since popularized by Pallua in the late 90s, several clinical series have been published showing its versatility and usefulness. However, only a few studies have focused on factors associated with complications from SCIF use. In this study, we analyzed the factors contributing to SCIF unreliability. We performed a retrospective review of the data of 87 patients undergoing SCIF reconstruction between 2008 and 2015. No significant differences in mean complication rates were observed when the SCIF was used for primary or salvage reconstruction (28% versus 25%, respectively, p = 0.816) or for cutaneous or intraoral reconstruction (27% versus 28%, respectively, p= 0.932). Flap folding, preoperative radiotherapy, and microsurgery were associated with significantly increased complication rates (p =0.002, p= 0.043, and p= 0.001, respectively), whereas smoking (p =0.431) had no impact with regard to this. In conclusion, the SCIF is a versatile flap and an important therapeutic tool for use in salvage surgeries, particularly in those performed in patients with poor clinical conditions and limited flap options.
Palavras-chave
Supraclavicular flap, Head and neck, Reconstruction, Cancer
Referências
  1. Alves HRN, 2012, J PLAST RECONSTR AES, V65, P1350, DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.04.050
  2. ARIYAN S, 1979, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V63, P73, DOI 10.1097/00006534-197901000-00012
  3. Baek CH, 2016, ORAL ONCOL, V62, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.10.004
  4. Baek S M, 1980, Ann Plast Surg, V5, P108
  5. Blackwell KE, 1997, HEAD NECK-J SCI SPEC, V19, P620, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0347(199710)19:7<620::AID-HED10>3.0.CO;2-6
  6. CHANDRASEKHAR B, 1988, ANN PLAS SURG, V21, P201, DOI 10.1097/00000637-198809000-00003
  7. Chen HC, 1999, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V103, P839, DOI 10.1097/00006534-199903000-00009
  8. Chiu ES, 2009, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V124, P115, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aa0e5d
  9. CUMMINGS CW, 1989, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V115, P1181
  10. Epps MT, 2011, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V127, P1925, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820cf40a
  11. Henderson PW, 2010, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V126, p94E, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de23ce
  12. Iyer NG, 2009, ANZ J SURG, V79, P799, DOI 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.05097.x
  13. Koh KS, 2006, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V118, P1145, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000221119.00987.48
  14. KOSHIMA I, 1993, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V92, P411, DOI 10.1097/00006534-199309000-00004
  15. Levy JM, 2011, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V22, P1751, DOI 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822e62e9
  16. McLean JN, 2010, ANN PLAS SURG, V64, P570, DOI 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181c51f4a
  17. Nakatsuka T, 2003, J RECONSTR MICROSURG, V19, P363, DOI 10.1055/s-2003-42630
  18. Neligan PC, 2007, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V119, P891, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000255542.35404.af
  19. Okazaki M, 2007, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V119, P1223, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000254400.29522.1c
  20. Pallua N, 2000, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V105, P842, DOI 10.1097/00006534-200003000-00003
  21. Ramirez CA, 2014, ORAL MAXIL SURG CLIN, V26, P411, DOI 10.1016/j.coms.2014.05.009
  22. Razdan SN, 2015, J RECONSTR MICROSURG, V31, P378, DOI 10.1055/s-0035-1546294
  23. Sandu K, 2012, EUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L, V269, P1261, DOI 10.1007/s00405-011-1754-0
  24. Su T, 2013, J ORAL MAXIL SURG, V71, P622, DOI 10.1016/j.joms.2012.07.005
  25. Wei FC, 2001, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V108, P1154, DOI 10.1097/00006534-200110000-00007
  26. Wei FC, 2001, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V108, P1161
  27. Yu BT, 2013, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V131, p520E, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182818c08