Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/33521
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
dc.contributor.authorOGATA, Nara G.
dc.contributor.authorDAGA, Fabio B.
dc.contributor.authorJAMMAL, Alessandro A.
dc.contributor.authorBOER, Erwin R.
dc.contributor.authorHILL, Linda L.
dc.contributor.authorSTRINGHAM, James M.
dc.contributor.authorSUSANNA JR., Remo
dc.contributor.authorMEDEIROS, Felipe A.
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-23T14:19:03Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-23T14:19:03Z-
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationJAMA NETWORK OPEN, v.2, n.4, article ID e192169, 10p, 2019
dc.identifier.issn2574-3805
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/33521-
dc.description.abstractIMPORTANCE Combining mobile telephone use with driving is not unusual. However, distracted driving limits driving performance because of limited capacity for persons to divide attention. OBJECTIVES To investigate the frequency of mobile telephone use while driving and to assess whether patients with glaucoma had a disproportionate decrease in driving performance while conversing on a mobile telephone compared with healthy participants. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Cross-sectional study of surveys collected from 112 patients with glaucoma and 70 control participants investigating mobile telephone use while driving. A randomly selected subgroup of 37 patients with glaucoma and 28 controls drove in a driving simulator to investigate peripheral event detection performance during distracted driving at the Visual Performance Laboratory, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. Data collection was performed from December 1, 2016, through April 30, 2017. EXPOSURES Participants answered a survey and submitted to a driving simulation test with and without mobile telephone use. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Survey answers were collected, and distracted driving performance, assessed by reaction time to peripheral stimuli, was analyzed. RESULTS Of the 182 participants who answered the survey, the 112 participants with glaucoma included 56 women (50.0%) and had a mean (SD) age of 73.6 (9.6) years. The 70 controls included 49 women (70.0%) and had a mean (SD) age of 68.4 (10.9) years. When asked about mobile telephone use while driving, 30 patients with glaucoma (26.8%) admitted rarely using and 2 (1.8%) sometimes using it. In the control group, 20 participants (28.6%) admitted rarely using and 2 (2.9%) sometimes using the telephone while driving (P = .80). Reaction times to peripheral stimuli were significantly longer among patients with glaucoma compared with controls during mobile telephone use (median [interquartile range], 1.86 [1.42-2.29] seconds vs 1.14 [0.98-1.59] seconds; P = .02). Compared with driving performance while not using a mobile telephone, the mean (SD) increase of 0.85 (0.60) second in reaction time while conversing on the mobile telephone among patients with glaucoma was significantly greater than the mean (SD) increase of 0.68 (0.83) second for controls (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study's findings indicate that patients with glaucoma use mobile telephones while driving as frequently as healthy participants. However, the findings also suggest that patients with glaucoma may experience a greater decline than healthy participants in their ability to detect peripheral events while driving when also talking on a mobile telephone. Patients with glaucoma should be informed that they may have a higher driving risk that may be worsened by distractions, such as mobile telephone use.eng
dc.description.sponsorship[EY021818]
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAMER MEDICAL ASSOCeng
dc.relation.ispartofJama Network Open
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subject.otherdriving performanceeng
dc.subject.otherattentioneng
dc.subject.otherphoneeng
dc.subject.othereyeeng
dc.titleMobile Telephone Use and Reaction Time in Drivers With Glaucomaeng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.rights.holderCopyright AMER MEDICAL ASSOCeng
dc.identifier.doi10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2169
dc.identifier.pmid30977856
dc.subject.wosMedicine, General & Internaleng
dc.type.categoryoriginal articleeng
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioneng
hcfmusp.author.externalDAGA, Fabio B.:Duke Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Visual Performance Lab, Duke Eye Ctr, 2310 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27710 USA
hcfmusp.author.externalJAMMAL, Alessandro A.:Duke Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Visual Performance Lab, Duke Eye Ctr, 2310 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27710 USA
hcfmusp.author.externalBOER, Erwin R.:Entropy Control Inc, La Jolla, CA USA
hcfmusp.author.externalHILL, Linda L.:Univ Calif San Diego, Div Prevent Med, Dept Family Med & Publ Hlth, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
hcfmusp.author.externalSTRINGHAM, James M.:Duke Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Visual Performance Lab, Duke Eye Ctr, 2310 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27710 USA
hcfmusp.author.externalMEDEIROS, Felipe A.:Duke Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Visual Performance Lab, Duke Eye Ctr, 2310 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27710 USA
hcfmusp.description.articlenumbere192169
hcfmusp.description.issue4
hcfmusp.description.volume2
hcfmusp.origemWOS
hcfmusp.origem.idWOS:000476798700036
hcfmusp.origem.id2-s2.0-85064833979
hcfmusp.publisher.cityCHICAGOeng
hcfmusp.publisher.countryUSAeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBADDELEY AD, 1968, PSYCHON SCI, V10, P341eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCasagrande VA, 2005, PROG BRAIN RES, V149, P11, DOI 10.1016/S0079-6123(05)49002-0eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCorbetta M, 1998, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V95, P831, DOI 10.1073/pnas.95.3.831eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDiniz A, 2016, TRANSL VIS SCI TECHN, V5, DOI 10.1167/tvst.5.6.15eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDrummond SPA, 2003, NEUROREPORT, V14, P1117, DOI 10.1097/01.wnr.0000075422.59944.b2eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceEngelberg JK, 2015, J TRANSP HEALTH, V2, P434, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2015.05.002eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFisher DL, 042 NETCeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFonda SJ, 2001, J GERONTOL B-PSYCHOL, V56, pS343, DOI 10.1093/geronb/56.6.S343eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGangeddula V, 2017, FRONT AGING NEUROSCI, V9, DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00286eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGracitelli CPB, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0138288eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHill L, 2015, TRAFFIC INJ PREV, V16, P362, DOI 10.1080/15389588.2014.949340eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceIshigami Y, 2009, J SAFETY RES, V40, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.jsr.2009.02.006eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKlein J, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0128681eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLenne MG, 1997, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V29, P431, DOI 10.1016/S0001-4575(97)00022-5eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMartens M, 2000, MEASURING DISTRACTIOeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMcGehee DV, 2000, P IEA 2000 HFES 2000, V44, P320, DOI 10.1177/154193120004402026eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMuttart JW, 2007, TRANSP RES RECORD, P9, DOI 10.3141/2018-02eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNational Safety Council, ANN EST CELL PHON CReng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNelson-Quigg JM, 2000, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V41, P2212eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePOSNER MI, 1990, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V13, P25, DOI 10.1146/annurev.neuro.13.1.25eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRagland DR, 2005, J GERONTOL A-BIOL, V60, P399, DOI 10.1093/gerona/60.3.399eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRamulu PY, 2009, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V116, P1846, DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.03.033eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRecarte MA, 2000, J EXP PSYCHOL-APPL, V6, P31, DOI 10.1037//0278-7393.6.1.31eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceReed MP, 1999, ERGONOMICS, V42, P1015, DOI 10.1080/001401399185117eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSzlyk JP, 2002, J REHABIL RES DEV, V39, P467eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceTatham AJ, 2015, TRANSL VIS SCI TECHN, V4, DOI 10.1167/tvst.4.3.5eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceTatham AJ, 2014, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V158, P1008, DOI 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.07.028eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceVega RP, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0077294eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWang Y, 2010, ERGONOMICS, V53, P404, DOI 10.1080/00140130903464358eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWeinreb RN, 2014, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V311, P1901, DOI 10.1001/jama.2014.3192eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWoo TH, 2001, IATSS RES INT ASS TR, V25, P15, DOI [10.1016/S0386-1112(14)60066-2, DOI 10.1016/S0386-1112(14)60066-2]eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWorld Med Assoc, 2013, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V310, P2191, DOI 10.1001/jama.2013.281053eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceYucel YH, 2003, PROG RETIN EYE RES, V22, P465, DOI 10.1016/S1350-9462(03)00026-0eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceZEGER SL, 1986, BIOMETRICS, V42, P121, DOI 10.2307/2531248eng
dc.description.indexPubMedeng
hcfmusp.citation.scopus8-
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-03-29-
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MOF
Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia e Oftalmologia - FM/MOF

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Instituto Central - HC/ICHC

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/33
LIM/33 - Laboratório de Oftalmologia

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - ODS/03
ODS/03 - Saúde e bem-estar


Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art_OGATA_Mobile_Telephone_Use_and_Reaction_Time_in_Drivers_2019.PDFpublishedVersion (English)746.22 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.