Clinical Trial for Stuttering Treatment: pilot study about dog participation in the therapy session

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
3
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
SOC BRASILEIRA FONOAUDIOLOGIA
Citação
CODAS, v.31, n.5, article ID e20180274, 7p, 2019
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Purpose: To verify the effect of dog intervention on the regular session of speech therapy for developmental stuttering in adults. Methods: The study involved young adults and adults with developmental stuttering. The study sample was composed of eight participants, six males and two tamales, ranging in age from 16 to 45 years. Participants were divided into two groups: G1 - those who underwent treatment for stuttering with the presence of a dog-therapist in the therapy room and G2 - those who underwent treatment for stuttering without the presence of the dog therapist. We included a control group, G3, composed of fluent participants, matched in age and sex to G1 and G2 to control the natural variability of speech fluency. Results: Comparative results between the groups indicated that the group that performed the treatment without the presence of the clog achieved better performance, evolution and efficacy rates. Conclusion: for the population in this study. the dog intervention on speech therapy did not improve treatment.
Palavras-chave
Stuttering, Speech, Animal Assisted Therapy, Treatment, Clinical Trial
Referências
  1. Andrade CE, 2017, CARSYS'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND ACM INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SMART, AUTONOMOUS, AND CONNECTED VEHICULAR SYSTEMS AND SERVICES, P65, DOI 10.1145/3131944.3131953
  2. Andrade CRF, 2005, REV CEFAC, V7, P150
  3. Andrade CRF, 2017, ADOLESCENTES ADULTOS, P31
  4. Andrade CRF, 2006, PERFIL FLUENCIA FALA
  5. Boyer VE, 2014, CAN J SPEECH-LANG PA, V38, P26
  6. Chow S.C., 2004, DESIGN ANAL CLIN TRI
  7. Davis RA., 2018, ASHA LEAD, V23, P32, DOI [10.1044/leader.AE.23052018.32, DOI 10.1044/LEADER.AE.23052018.32]
  8. Domingues CM, 2007, THESIS
  9. Gehan EA, 1994, STAT MED RES DEV CLI, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4615-2518-9, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-2518-9]
  10. Hegde MN, 1994, CLIN RES COMMUNICATI
  11. Hulley SB, 2008, DELINEANDO PESQUISA
  12. IAHAIO: International Association of Human-Animal Interaction Organizations, 2014, IAHAIO WHIT PAP
  13. Kamioka H, 2014, COMPLEMENT THER MED, V22, P371, DOI 10.1016/j.ctim.2013.12.016
  14. LaFrance C, 2007, J COMMUN DISORD, V40, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2006.06.010
  15. Lefebvre SL, 2008, AM J INFECT CONTROL, V36, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.09.005
  16. Luna BFo, 2010, CIENCIA ARTE LER ART, P176
  17. Macauley BL, 2006, J REHABIL RES DEV, V43, P357, DOI 10.1682/JRRD.2005.01.0027
  18. Maujean A, 2015, ANTHROZOOS, V28, P23, DOI 10.2752/089279315X14129350721812
  19. Maxwell D. L., 2006, RES STAT METHODS COM
  20. MORALES L.J, 2005, REV CHIL INFECTOL, V22, P257, DOI 10.4067/S0716-
  21. NIH: National Institutes of Health, 2003, INTR CLIN TRIALS
  22. Nye C, 2013, J SPEECH LANG HEAR R, V56, P921, DOI 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0036)
  23. Oliveira GR, 2010, THESIS
  24. Onslow M, 2008, AM J SPEECH-LANG PAT, V17, P401, DOI 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/07-0047)
  25. RILEY GD, 1994, STUTTERING SEVERITY
  26. Robey RR, 2004, J COMMUN DISORD, V37, P401, DOI 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2004.04.003
  27. Shafer DN, 2006, ASHA LEADER, V11, P34, DOI [10.1044/leader.MIW2.11022006.34, DOI 10.1044/LEADER.MIW2.11022006.34]
  28. Tsai CC, 2010, ANTHROZOOS, V23, P245, DOI 10.2752/175303710X12750451258977
  29. Usler E, 2017, J SPEECH LANG HEAR R, V60, P51, DOI 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-15-0367
  30. Venkatagiri HS, 2009, J SPEECH LANG HEAR R, V52, P500, DOI 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0019)