Reliability of endoscopic dye transit test for prediction of functional success after diode laser and external dacryocystorhinostomy

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_FEIJO_Reliability_of_endoscopic_dye_transit_test_for_prediction_2020.PDF (164.46 KB)
Citações na Scopus
2
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2020
DOI
SciELO
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
CONSEL BRASIL OFTALMOLOGIA
Autores
FEIJO, Eduardo Damous
CAIXETA, Juliana Alves
ALMEIDA, Adriana Ribeiro de
LIMONGI, Roberto Murillo
Citação
ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA, v.83, n.1, p.1-4, 2020
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Purpose: To determine the reliability of the endoscopic dye transit test for the prediction of functional success after dacryocystorhinostomy. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 50 patients who underwent external dacryocystorhinostomy Group or transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy Group and had anatomically patent ducts during irrigation, with a minimum 6-month follow-up. The external dacryocystorhinostomy, defined as the time from instillation of the dye into the conjunctival sac until its flow from the rhinostomy site, was performed in all patients. Positive predictive value of the endoscopic dye transit test to assess functional success was analyzed. The cutoff point was determined using a receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: Of the 50 patients, 44 (88%) exhibited subjective improvement or complete resolution of epiphora (functional success). The best cutoff point for the endoscopic dye transit test was 60 s. Of 39 patients with endoscopic dye transit test <= 60 s, 38 (97.4%) exhibited functional success, demonstrating a 97.4% positive predictive value. Conclusion: The endoscopic dye transit test <= 60 s is a reliable tool to predict functional success and good prognosis after external or laser transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy.
Palavras-chave
Lacrimal apparatus diseases, Dacryocystorhinostomy, Endoscopy, Nasolacrimal duct, Laser therapy/methods, Lasers, semiconductor, Predictive value of tests
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/36015
Referências
  1. Akay F, 2015, ARQ BRAS OFTALMOL, V78, P164, DOI 10.5935/0004-2749.20150042
  2. Alañón Fernández FJ, 2004, Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol, V79, P325
  3. Ali MJ, 2014, CLIN OPHTHALMOL, V8, P2491, DOI 10.2147/OPTH.S73998
  4. Alnawaiseh M, 2016, BMC OPHTHALMOL, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12886-016-0293-2
  5. Delaney YM, 2002, OPHTHAL PLAST RECONS, V18, P281, DOI 10.1097/00002341-200207000-00009
  6. Dogan R, 2013, EUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L, V270, P2255, DOI 10.1007/s00405-013-2351-1
  7. Kashkouli MB, 2015, OPHTHAL PLAST RECONS, V31, P296, DOI 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000308
  8. Kaynak P, 2014, OPHTHAL PLAST RECONS, V30, P28, DOI 10.1097/01.iop.0000437533.66479.f0
  9. Riera JM, 2007, ACTA OTORRINOLAR ESP, V58, P10
  10. MUNK PL, 1990, RADIOLOGY, V177, P687, DOI 10.1148/radiology.177.3.2243969
  11. Munk PL, 1991, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V180, P289
  12. Plaza G, 2007, OPHTHAL PLAST RECONS, V23, P179, DOI 10.1097/IOP.0b013e31804bdef9
  13. Roh JH, 2010, ACTA OPHTHALMOL, V88, pe73, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.01873.x
  14. Rose GE, 2004, OPHTHAL PLAST RECONS, V20, P262, DOI 10.1097/01.IOP.0000131731.32241.8D
  15. Rose GE, OPHTHALMIC PLAST REC, V21, P167
  16. Rose GE, OPHTHALMIC PLAST REC, V21, P166
  17. Savino G, 2014, ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGO, V34, P29
  18. Shams PN, 2014, JAMA OPHTHALMOL, V132, P1127, DOI 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.1093
  19. TARBET KJ, 1995, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V102, P1065
  20. Yildirim Y, 2016, J OPHTHALMOL, DOI 10.1155/2016/6719529
  21. Yoon Sung Wook, 2006, Korean J Ophthalmol, V20, P1

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MOF
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/33