Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/36255
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
dc.contributor.authorRIBEIRO, Tatiane Bomfim
dc.contributor.authorRIBEIRO, Adalton
dc.contributor.authorRODRIGUES, Luiza de Oliveira
dc.contributor.authorHARADA, Guilherme
dc.contributor.authorNOBRE, Moacyr Roberto Cuce
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-01T15:01:36Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-01T15:01:36Z-
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, v.36, n.1, p.20-28, 2020
dc.identifier.issn0266-4623
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/36255-
dc.description.abstractObjective This paper aims to describe the clinical and regulatory aspects of new drugs and indications that were approved for lung, breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer, from 2016 to 2018, in order to provide health technology assessment trends in oncology. Methods Data were collected from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) online database for new medications and indications approved for the above-mentioned types of cancer. Data regarding clinical study characteristics and regulatory information were collected. Results From 2016 to 2018, 53 percent of the FDA approvals of new drugs and indications for the most incident cancers were for oral protein kinase inhibitor monotherapy for advanced lung cancer. Since 2018, four drugs were approved as tumor-agnostic therapies. A biomarker was included in 72 percent of indications, and 58 percent of approvals were for targeted therapies, potentially heralding an end to research into conventional cytotoxic agents. A special designation for faster approval was granted in 78 percent of new approvals. The majority of the studies were open label randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (44 percent), followed by blind RCTs, single-arm clinical trials, and cohort studies. Only 14 percent of studies used overall survival as the primary end point; the vast majority used surrogate end points, and did not use patient-important outcomes. Three biosimilars were approved in the period. Conclusion Advanced lung cancer therapy, mainly targeted drugs, accounted for 53 percent of approvals. Special designations for faster approval were used in 78 percent of FDA approvals, and four drugs were approved for tumor-agnostic treatment-a new form of approval.eng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherCAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESSeng
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesseng
dc.subjectFDAeng
dc.subjectUnited States Food and Drug Administrationeng
dc.subjectDrug approvaleng
dc.subjectCancereng
dc.subjectLung cancereng
dc.subjectBreast cancereng
dc.subjectProstate cancereng
dc.subjectColorectal cancereng
dc.subject.othersurrogate end-pointseng
dc.subject.otherstrengtheng
dc.subject.otheroncologyeng
dc.subject.otherassociationeng
dc.subject.othersurvivaleng
dc.titleUS Food and Drug Administration anticancer drug approval trends from 2016 to 2018 for lung, colorectal, breast, and prostate cancereng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.rights.holderCopyright CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESSeng
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0266462319000813
dc.identifier.pmid31775939
dc.subject.wosHealth Care Sciences & Serviceseng
dc.subject.wosPublic, Environmental & Occupational Healtheng
dc.subject.wosMedical Informaticseng
dc.type.categoryeditorial materialeng
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioneng
hcfmusp.author.externalRIBEIRO, Adalton:Sao Paulo Hlth Dept, Sao Paulo, Brazil
hcfmusp.author.externalRODRIGUES, Luiza de Oliveira:UNIMED Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
hcfmusp.description.articlenumberPII S0266462319000813
hcfmusp.description.beginpage20
hcfmusp.description.endpage28
hcfmusp.description.issue1
hcfmusp.description.volume36
hcfmusp.origemWOS
hcfmusp.origem.idWOS:000524943100005
hcfmusp.origem.id2-s2.0-85082659089
hcfmusp.publisher.cityNEW YORKeng
hcfmusp.publisher.countryUSAeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBarlesi F, 2016, LANCET, V387, P1415, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00004-0eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBlumenthal GM, 2019, NAT REV CLIN ONCOL, V16, P139, DOI 10.1038/s41571-019-0170-zeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBray F, 2018, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V68, P394, DOI 10.3322/caac.21492eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCDER, 2014, CTR DRUG EV RES ADVeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCornes P, 2012, TARGET ONCOL, V7, pS57, DOI 10.1007/s11523-011-0196-3eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDavis C, 2017, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V359, DOI 10.1136/bmj.j4530eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDillon A, 2018, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V319, P767, DOI 10.1001/jama.2017.20552eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceEisenhauer EA, 2009, EUR J CANCER, V45, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFDA. Food and Drud Administration, 2018, CTR DRUG EV RES FRAMeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFDA. Food and Drug Administration, 2014, CTR DRUG EV RES GUIDeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGlobal Oncology Trends, 2018, IQVIA I HUM DAT SCIeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGoring S, 2019, BMJ OPEN, V9, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024895eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGyawali B, 2019, JAMA INTERN MED, V179, P906, DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0462eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHaslam A, 2019, EUR J CANCER, V106, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.11.012eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceJardim DL, 2016, ONCOTARGET, V7, P53037, DOI 10.18632/oncotarget.10588eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceJohnson JR, 2011, J NATL CANCER I, V103, P636, DOI 10.1093/jnci/djr062eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKim C, 2016, MAYO CLIN PROC, V91, P713, DOI 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.02.012eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKinch MS, 2014, DRUG DISCOV TODAY, V19, P1831, DOI 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.08.007eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLadanie A, 2019, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V114, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.033eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLemery S, 2017, NEW ENGL J MED, V377, P1409, DOI 10.1056/NEJMp1709968eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNabhan C, 2019, JAMA ONCOL, V5, P781, DOI 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0450eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePrasad V, 2015, JAMA INTERN MED, V175, P1389, DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2829eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSalas-Vega S, 2017, JAMA ONCOL, V3, P382, DOI 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4166eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSchleicher SM, 2017, JAMA ONCOL, V3, P989, DOI 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.6789eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceShen C, 2014, EXPERT REV PHARM OUT, V14, P45, DOI 10.1586/14737167.2014.868310eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSiegel RL, 2017, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V67, P7, DOI 10.3322/caac.21387eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSun JC, 2017, BMC SYST BIOL, V11, P27, DOI 10.1186/s12918-017-0464-7eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWHO, 2018, PRIC CANC MED ITS IMeng
dc.description.indexMEDLINEeng
dc.identifier.eissn1471-6348
hcfmusp.citation.scopus13-
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-03-29-
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICESP
Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo - HC/ICESP

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/InCor
Instituto do Coração - HC/InCor

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - ODS/03
ODS/03 - Saúde e bem-estar


Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art_RIBEIRO_US_Food_and_Drug_Administration_anticancer_drug_approval_2020.PDF
  Restricted Access
publishedVersion (English)194.63 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.