THE DESIGN OF THE ARTERIOVENOUS VASCULAR LOOP DOES NOT AFFECT ITS PATENCY: EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2020
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ATHA COMUNICACAO & EDITORA
Citação
ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA, v.28, n.3, p.121-127, 2020
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objective: To evaluate the effect of the design of a femoral vascular loop with anastomosis in the femoral artery of rabbits on the presence of flow (patency) after seven days. Methods: A total of 39 rabbits underwent arteriovenous microanastomosis using the microsurgical technique. Two loop designs were used: one circular and the other angled. The parameters evaluated were presence or absence of flow, signs of hemolysis and hemodynamic changes. Results: After seven days, flow was present in 68% of the angled loops and 75% of the circular loops (p > 0.05). There was a significant intragroup decrease in pCO(2) and a significant increase in pH. For the other parameters evaluated, no significant differences between the two loop models were found. Conclusions: A reproducible vascular loop model was shown. There was no significant difference between the two vascular loop models about the presence of flow after seven days.
Palavras-chave
Arteriovenous Anastomosis, Vascular Grafting, Femoral Vein
Referências
  1. Asano Y, 2005, MED BIOL ENG COMPUT, V43, P126, DOI 10.1007/BF02345133
  2. ASCHBERG S, 1976, ACTA CHIR SCAND, V142, P585
  3. Atiyeh BS, 2001, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V108, P485, DOI 10.1097/00006534-200108000-00031
  4. Cavadas PC, 2008, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V121, P514, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000297634.53915.e5
  5. Depprich Rita A, 2008, Head Face Med, V4, P27, DOI 10.1186/1746-160X-4-27
  6. Giovanoli P, 1998, MICROSURG, V18, P242
  7. Greenwald L L, 1990, Ann Vasc Surg, V4, P244, DOI 10.1007/BF02009452
  8. Harry BL, 2013, MICROSURG, V33, P416, DOI 10.1002/micr.22106
  9. Kilkenny C, 2010, BRIT J PHARMACOL, V160, P1577, DOI 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00872.x
  10. Langer S, 2009, NEPHROL DIAL TRANSPL, V24, P2201, DOI 10.1093/ndt/gfp033
  11. Lin CH, 2004, J TRAUMA, V56, P1107, DOI 10.1097/01.TA.0000114637.29779.AB
  12. Lind B, 2012, VASC ENDOVASC SURG, V46, P30, DOI 10.1177/1538574411418843
  13. Masden DL, 2013, J HAND SURG-AM, V38A, P572, DOI 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.12.009
  14. National Research Council (U.S.). Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (U.S.) National Academies Press (U.S.), 2011, GUIDE CARE USE LAB A
  15. Polykandriotis E, 2011, J RECONSTR MICROSURG, V27, P11, DOI 10.1055/s-0030-1267385
  16. Rechnic M, 1997, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V99, P242, DOI 10.1097/00006534-199701000-00038
  17. Reichenberger MA, 2010, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V140, P1283, DOI 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.05.019
  18. SORENSEN JL, 1990, SCAND J PLAST RECONS, V24, P43, DOI 10.3109/02844319009004519
  19. THRELFALL GN, 1982, AUST NZ J SURG, V52, P182, DOI 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1982.tb06098.x
  20. Yuan SM, 2011, ANN SAUDI MED, V31, P62, DOI 10.4103/0256-4947.75781