Associated factors to the consumption of ultra-processed foods and its relation with dietary sources in Portugal

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_MAGALHAES_Associated_factors_to_the_consumption_of_ultraprocessed_foods_2021.PDF (792.84 KB)
Citações na Scopus
15
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2021
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
Autores
MAGALHAES, Vania
SEVERO, Milton
CORREIA, Daniela
TORRES, Duarte
RAUBER, Fernanda
RODRIGUES, Sara
LOPES, Carla
Citação
JOURNAL OF NUTRITIONAL SCIENCE, v.10, article ID e89, 11p, 2021
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are common worldwide and associated with poorer health outcomes. This work aimed to explore the UPF consumption associated factors and its main dietary sources, by sex, in Portugal. Participants from the National Food, Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (IAN-AF) 2015-2016, aged 3-84 years, were included (n 5005). Dietary intake was assessed through two 1-day food diaries/24 h recalls. UPFs were identified using the NOVA classification. Associations were evaluated through linear regression models. Median UPF consumption was 257 g/d (10.6 % of total quantity; 23.8 % of total energy). Adolescents were those with higher consumption (490 g/d). Compared to adults, younger ages were positively associated with UPF consumption (e.g. adolescents ((beta) over cap -females: 192, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 135, 249; (beta) over cap -males: 327, 95 % CI: 277, 377)). A lower educational level was associated with lower UPF consumption ((beta) over cap -females: -63; 95 % CI: -91, -34; (beta) over cap -males: -68; 95 % CI: -124, -12). Also, a lower UPF consumption was observed in married males/couples compared to singles ((beta) over cap: -48, 95 % CI: -96, -1). Furthermore, female current/former smokers were associated with a higher UPF consumption v. never smokers ((beta) over cap: 79, 95 % CI: 41, 118; (beta) over cap: 42, 95 % CI: 8, 75, respectively). Main UPF sources were yoghurts, soft drinks and cold meats/sausages differing strongly by sex, age and education level. Yoghurts containing additives were the main contributors to the UPF consumption in children and adult females from all education (similar to 20 %). Soft drinks were leaders in adolescents (females: 26.0 %; males: 31.6 %) and young male adults (24.4 %). Cold meats/sausages stood out among low-educated males (20.5 %). Males, younger age groups, higher education, children with less-educated parents, married/couple males and smoking females were positively associated with UPF consumption.
Palavras-chave
National survey, Nova, Portugal, Ultra-processed foods
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/44015
Referências
  1. Aryana KJ, 2017, J DAIRY SCI, V100, P9987, DOI 10.3168/jds.2017-12981
  2. Askari M, 2020, INT J OBESITY, V44, P2080, DOI 10.1038/s41366-020-00650-z
  3. Baker P, 2020, OBES REV, V21, DOI 10.1111/obr.13126
  4. Baptista S., 2018, IMPACTO IMPOSTO ESPE
  5. Baraldi LG, 2018, BMJ OPEN, V8, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020574
  6. Bassett DR, 2003, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V35, P1396, DOI 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078923.96621.1D
  7. Bickel G., 2000, GUIDE MEASURING HOUS
  8. Blanco-Rojo R, 2019, MAYO CLIN PROC, V94, P2178, DOI 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.03.035
  9. Boon P, 2011, EFSA J, V9, DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2489
  10. Chen XJ, 2020, NUTR J, V19, DOI 10.1186/s12937-020-00604-1
  11. Conway JM, 2003, AM J CLIN NUTR, V77, P1171, DOI 10.1093/ajcn/77.5.1171
  12. Costa CD, 2018, CAD SAUDE PUBLICA, V34, DOI [10.1590/0102-311X00021017, 10.1590/0102-311x00021017]
  13. Cruz F, 2018, NUTRITION, V55-56, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.nut.2018.02.015
  14. Czlapka-Matyasik M, 2018, NUTRIENTS, V10, DOI 10.3390/nu10101463
  15. da Rocha BRS, 2021, PUBLIC HEALTH NUTR, V24, P3294, DOI 10.1017/S1368980020001524
  16. de Miranda RC, 2021, BRIT J NUTR, V125, P1177, DOI 10.1017/S000711452000344X
  17. Dekkers ALM, 2014, J NUTR, V144, P2083, DOI 10.3945/jn.114.191288
  18. Djupegot IL, 2017, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V17, DOI 10.1186/s12889-017-4408-3
  19. dos Santos FS, 2020, REV SAUDE PUBL, V54, DOI 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001704
  20. Durao C, 2017, PUBLIC HEALTH NUTR, V20, P1973, DOI 10.1017/S1368980017000854
  21. European Food Safety Authority, 2014, EFSA J, V12, DOI [10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3944, 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4071]
  22. Fagerberg P, 2019, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V19, DOI 10.1186/s12889-019-8090-5
  23. FAO, 2015, GUID COLL INF FOOD P
  24. Forshee RA, 2004, J NUTR, V134, P2733, DOI 10.1093/jn/134.10.2733
  25. Goios ACL, 2020, PUBLIC HEALTH NUTR, V23, P3093, DOI 10.1017/S1368980020001044
  26. Instituto Nacional de Estatistica (Portugal), 2014, NEW CLASS URB AR DEL
  27. Khandpur N, 2020, REV SAUDE PUBL, V54, DOI 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001176
  28. Kim Hae-Young, 2013, Restor Dent Endod, V38, P52, DOI 10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52
  29. Lam MCL, 2017, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V14, DOI 10.1186/s12966-017-0524-9
  30. Lopes C., 2018, IAN AF 2015 2016 SUM
  31. Lopes C, 2018, JMIR RES PROTOC, V7, DOI 10.2196/resprot.8990
  32. Lumley Thomas, 2020, CRAN
  33. Machin L, 2020, PUBLIC HEALTH NUTR, V23, P2932, DOI 10.1017/S1368980020003158
  34. Maia EG, 2020, PUBLIC HEALTH NUTR, V23, P579, DOI 10.1017/S1368980019003586
  35. Marron-Ponce JA, 2018, PUBLIC HEALTH NUTR, V21, P87, DOI 10.1017/S1368980017002129
  36. Mikkila V, 2005, BRIT J NUTR, V93, P923, DOI 10.1079/BJN20051418
  37. Monteiro CA, 2013, OBES REV, V14, P21, DOI 10.1111/obr.12107
  38. Monteiro CA, 2019, PUBLIC HEALTH NUTR, V22, P936, DOI 10.1017/S1368980018003762
  39. Monteiro CA, 2018, PUBLIC HEALTH NUTR, V21, P18, DOI 10.1017/S1368980017001379
  40. Monteiro CA, 2018, PUBLIC HEALTH NUTR, V21, P5, DOI 10.1017/S1368980017000234
  41. Moubarac JC, 2013, PUBLIC HEALTH NUTR, V16, P2240, DOI 10.1017/S1368980012005009
  42. Nardocci M, 2019, CAN J PUBLIC HEALTH, V110, P4, DOI 10.17269/s41997-018-0130-x
  43. National Health Institute Doutor Ricardo Jorge, 2006, PORT TAB COMP AL, P1
  44. Northstone K, 2008, BRIT J NUTR, V100, P1069, DOI 10.1017/S0007114508968264
  45. Oliveira A., 2017, EFSA SUPPORT PUBL, V14, P37, DOI [10.2903/sp.efsa.2017.EN-1341, DOI 10.2903/SP.EFSA.2017.EN-1341]
  46. Oliveira A, 2010, AM J CLIN NUTR, V92, P211, DOI 10.3945/ajcn.2009.29075
  47. Orfanos P, 2017, EUR J CLIN NUTR, V71, P407, DOI 10.1038/ejcn.2016.219
  48. Pagliai G, 2021, BRIT J NUTR, V125, P308, DOI 10.1017/S0007114520002688
  49. Pan American Health Organization, 2015, ULTRA PROCESSED FOOD
  50. R Core Team, 2017, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
  51. Rauber F, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0232676
  52. Rauber F, 2018, NUTRIENTS, V10, DOI 10.3390/nu10050587
  53. Russell C, 2021, NUTR RES REV, V34, P185, DOI 10.1017/S0954422420000268
  54. Schnabel L, 2019, JAMA INTERN MED, V179, P490, DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7289
  55. Meneguelli TS, 2020, INT J FOOD SCI NUTR, V71, P678, DOI 10.1080/09637486.2020.1725961
  56. Simoes BD, 2018, CAD SAUDE PUBLICA, V34, DOI [10.1590/0102-311X00019717, 10.1590/0102-311x00019717]
  57. Srour B, 2019, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V365, DOI 10.1136/bmj.l1451
  58. Thorning TK, 2017, AM J CLIN NUTR, V105, P1033, DOI 10.3945/ajcn.116.151548
  59. Torres D., 2017, INQUERITO ALIMENTAR
  60. Vandevijvere S, 2019, OBES REV, V20, P10, DOI 10.1111/obr.12860
  61. Vandevijvere S, 2019, EUR J NUTR, V58, P3267, DOI 10.1007/s00394-018-1870-3
  62. Vilarnau C, 2019, EUR J CLIN NUTR, V72, P83, DOI 10.1038/s41430-018-0313-9
  63. Vilela S, 2020, BRIT J NUTR, V124, P591, DOI 10.1017/S0007114520001373
  64. Zhang ZF, 2021, AM J CLIN NUTR, V113, P428, DOI 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa276

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/Outros
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/38