Characteristics and outcomes of 727 patients with mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome from a Brazilian cohort

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
7
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2022
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
WILEY
Citação
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, v.61, n.4, p.442-454, 2022
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sezary syndrome (SS) are the most prevalent cutaneous lymphomas. They were not described in a large Brazilian cohort yet. We aimed, with this single-center, retrospective cohort analysis, to describe the characteristics and outcomes of MF/SS in a tertiary public health service in Brazil. Methods MF/SS patients evaluated at the University of Sao Paulo Medical School between 1989 and 2018 were included. Data were collected at diagnosis. Demographic, clinical, histopathological, immunopathological, molecular, laboratory, and follow-up data were analyzed. Results Among 727 patients, 92.6% (673) were diagnosed with MF, 7.4% (54) with SS. There were 51.2% (372) of males, 48.8% (355) of females. The median age was 51.8 years; it was higher in erythrodermic MF (60.2) and SS (60.9). Among MF, 41.8% (281) had classic MF, 4.9% (33) folliculotropic MF, 1.8% (12) granulomatous slack skin, and 0.3% (2) pagetoid reticulosis. Common subtypes included erythrodermic (14.1%, 95), hypopigmented (10.8%, 73), and poikilodermatous MF (10.8%, 73). Extracutaneous involvement was rare. Five, 10, 20, and 30-year overall survival rates were 97.3%, 92.4%, 82.6%, and 82.6% for early-stage, and 58.6%, 42.7%, 20.8%, and 15.4% for advanced-stage disease, respectively. After multivariate analysis, SS diagnosis, folliculotropic MF, erythrodermic MF, clinical stage, age (>= 60 years), increased lactate dehydrogenase, and large cell transformation conferred poorer prognosis. Conclusions We observed a higher percentage of hypopigmented MF compared to the literature, and demographic (older age) and prognostic (poorer prognosis) similarities between erythrodermic MF and SS, suggesting a possible relationship between these erythrodermic lymphomas. Factors associated with a poorer prognosis were compatible with the literature.
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. Abbott RA, 2011, J AM ACAD DERMATOL, V65, P313, DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.05.041
  2. Abeldano A, 2019, INT J DERMATOL, V58, P449, DOI 10.1111/ijd.14262
  3. Agar NS, 2010, J CLIN ONCOL, V28, P4730, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.7665
  4. Almukhtar R, 2020, J AM ACAD DERMATOL, V83, P647, DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.11.051
  5. Amorim GM, 2018, AN BRAS DERMATOL, V93, P546, DOI 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20187106
  6. Bawazir MA, 2018, J EUR ACAD DERMATOL, V32, pE217, DOI 10.1111/jdv.14735
  7. Benner MF, 2012, BLOOD, V119, P1643, DOI 10.1182/blood-2011-08-376319
  8. Bittencourt AL, 2013, AM J CLIN PATHOL, V140, P348, DOI 10.1309/AJCPL52QGQPZWFHE
  9. Boonk SE, 2016, J INVEST DERMATOL, V136, P1364, DOI 10.1016/j.jid.2016.01.038
  10. Burg G, 2015, CLIN DERMATOL, V33, P563, DOI 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2015.05.008
  11. Castano E, 2013, J CUTAN PATHOL, V40, P924, DOI 10.1111/cup.12217
  12. Cengiz FP, 2017, ANN CLIN LAB SCI, V47, P25
  13. Cesar A, 2016, J DERMATOL CASE REP, V10, P1, DOI 10.3315/jdcr.2016.1222
  14. Charli-Joseph Y, 2021, JAMA DERMATOL, V157, P157, DOI 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.4372
  15. Chitgopeker P, 2014, J INVEST DERMATOL, V134, P1, DOI 10.1038/jid.2014.73
  16. Delfau-Larue MH, 2000, BLOOD, V96, P2987
  17. Desai M, 2015, J AM ACAD DERMATOL, V72, P276, DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.10.019
  18. EPSTEIN EH, 1972, MEDICINE, V51, P61, DOI 10.1097/00005792-197201000-00004
  19. Fraser-Andrews EA, 2006, BRIT J DERMATOL, V155, P756, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07428.x
  20. Furlan FC, 2014, DERMATOLOGY, V229, P271, DOI 10.1159/000363319
  21. Gerami P, 2008, ARCH DERMATOL, V144, P738, DOI 10.1001/archderm.144.6.738
  22. Goyal A, 2020, J AM ACAD DERMATOL, V83, P404, DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.07.075
  23. Guitart J, 2001, J CUTAN PATHOL, V28, P174, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0560.2001.028004174.x
  24. Guitart J, 2021, CYTOM PART B-CLIN CY, V100, P129, DOI 10.1002/cyto.b.21870
  25. Haththotuwa R, 2017, BRIT J DERMATOL, V177, P877, DOI 10.1111/bjd.15266
  26. Haynes L, 2009, CURR OPIN IMMUNOL, V21, P414, DOI 10.1016/j.coi.2009.05.009
  27. Hodak E, 2021, BRIT J DERMATOL, V184, P524, DOI 10.1111/bjd.19303
  28. Hodak E, 2019, CLIN DERMATOL, V37, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2019.01.004
  29. Hodak E, 2016, J AM ACAD DERMATOL, V75, P347, DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.03.009
  30. Hodak E, 2014, J AM ACAD DERMATOL, V70, P993, DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.12.029
  31. Holahan HM, 2018, INT J DERMATOL, V57, P1314, DOI 10.1111/ijd.14132
  32. Jaque A, 2019, INT J DERMATOL, V58, P933, DOI 10.1111/ijd.14391
  33. Jawed SI, 2014, J AM ACAD DERMATOL, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.07.049
  34. Jawed SI, 2014, J AM ACAD DERMATOL, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.08.033
  35. Kaito S, 2018, INT J HEMATOL, V107, P451, DOI 10.1007/s12185-017-2362-6
  36. Kim EJ, 2005, J CLIN INVEST, V115, P798, DOI 10.1172/JCI200524826
  37. Kim YH, 2003, ARCH DERMATOL, V139, P857, DOI 10.1001/archderm.139.7.857
  38. Kubica AW, 2012, J AM ACAD DERMATOL, V67, P1189, DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.04.043
  39. Lebowitz E, 2019, J EUR ACAD DERMATOL, V33, P108, DOI 10.1111/jdv.15236
  40. Lim HLJ, 2019, J EUR ACAD DERMATOL, V33, P1513, DOI 10.1111/jdv.15526
  41. Lindahl LM, 2016, ACTA DERM-VENEREOL, V96, P530, DOI 10.2340/00015555-2294
  42. Livesey A, 2020, CLIN EXP DERMATOL, V45, P539, DOI 10.1111/ced.14134
  43. Maecker HT, 2012, NAT REV IMMUNOL, V12, P191, DOI 10.1038/nri3158
  44. Martinez-Escala M Estela, 2014, Surg Pathol Clin, V7, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.path.2014.02.003
  45. Miyashiro D, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-66040-7
  46. Molloy K, 2020, BRIT J DERMATOL, V182, P770, DOI 10.1111/bjd.18089
  47. Morris L, 2020, AM J CLIN DERMATOL, V21, P383, DOI 10.1007/s40257-020-00501-7
  48. Mourad A, 2020, J INVEST DERMATOL, V140, P495, DOI 10.1016/j.jid.2019.07.712
  49. Nielsen PR, 2019, ACTA DERM-VENEREOL, V99, P1231, DOI 10.2340/00015555-3351
  50. Nudelmann LM, 2015, INT J DERMATOL, V54, pE512, DOI 10.1111/ijd.12970
  51. Olsen E, 2007, BLOOD, V110, P1713, DOI 10.1182/blood-2007-03-055749
  52. Penate Y, 2018, ACTAS DERMO-SIFILOGR, V109, P610, DOI 10.1016/j.ad.2018.03.006
  53. Pimpinelli N, 2005, J AM ACAD DERMATOL, V53, P1053, DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.08.057
  54. Quaglino P, 2012, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V118, P5830, DOI 10.1002/cncr.27627
  55. Raghavan SS, 2019, J CUTAN PATHOL, V46, P33, DOI 10.1111/cup.13375
  56. RAPPAPORT H, 1974, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V34, P1198, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197410)34:4<1198::AID-CNCR2820340431>3.0.CO;2-E
  57. Rodney IJ, 2017, J EUR ACAD DERMATOL, V31, P808, DOI 10.1111/jdv.13843
  58. Santagostino A, 1999, HAEMATOLOGICA, V84, P499
  59. Scarisbrick JJ, 2019, BRIT J DERMATOL, V181, P350, DOI 10.1111/bjd.17258
  60. Scarisbrick JJ, 2020, J INVEST DERMATOL, V140, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.jid.2019.08.440
  61. Scarisbrick JJ, 2018, EUR J CANCER, V93, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.01.076
  62. Scarisbrick JJ, 2015, J CLIN ONCOL, V33, P3766, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.7142
  63. Shadrach B, 2004, DIAGN MOL PATHOL, V13, P127, DOI 10.1097/01.pdm.0000126419.92931.a3
  64. Shamim H, 2019, J CUTAN PATHOL, V46, P645, DOI 10.1111/cup.13477
  65. Trautinger F, 2017, EUR J CANCER, V77, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.02.027
  66. Vakeva L, 2000, J INVEST DERMATOL, V115, P62, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2000.00011.x
  67. van Santen S, 2016, JAMA DERMATOL, V152, P992, DOI 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.1597
  68. Berg RV, 2020, DERMATOLOGY, V236, P117, DOI 10.1159/000502027
  69. Vega F, 2002, BLOOD, V100, P3369, DOI 10.1182/blood.V100.9.3369
  70. Vonderheid EC, 2002, J AM ACAD DERMATOL, V46, P95, DOI 10.1067/mjd.2002.118538
  71. Vonderheid EC, 2019, J CUTAN PATHOL, V46, P913, DOI 10.1111/cup.13564
  72. Willemze R, 2005, BLOOD, V105, P3768, DOI 10.1182/blood-2004-09-3502
  73. Willemze R, 2019, BLOOD, V133, P1703, DOI 10.1182/blood-2018-11-881268