Effects of ganglioside GM1 and erythropoietin on spinal cord injury in mice: Functional and immunohistochemical assessments

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
4
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2022
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ELSEVIER ESPANA
Citação
CLINICS, v.77, article ID 100006, 9p, 2022
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objectives: To evaluate the functional and immunohistochemical effects of ganglioside GM1 and erythropoietin following experimental spinal cord injury. Methods: Thirty-two male BALB/c mice were subjected to experimental spinal cord injury using the NYU Impactor device and were randomly divided into the following groups: GM1 group, receiving standard ganglioside GM1 (30 mg/kg); erythropoietin group, receiving erythropoietin (1000 IU/kg); combination group, receiving both drugs; and control group, receiving saline (0.9%). Animals were evaluated according to the Basso Mouse Scale (BMS) and Hindlimb Mouse Function Score (MFS). After euthanasia, the immunohistochemistry of the medullary tissue of mice was analyzed. All animals received intraperitoneal treatment. Results: The GM1 group had higher BMS and MFS scores at the end of the experiment when compared to all other groups. The combination group had higher BMS and MFS scores than the erythropoietin and control groups. The erythropoietin group had higher BMS and MFS scores than the control group. Immunohistochemical tissue analysis showed a significant difference among groups. There was a significant increase in myelinated axons and in the myelinated axon length in the erythropoietin group when compared to the other intervention groups (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Erythropoietin and GM1 have therapeutic effects on axonal regeneration in mice subjected to experimental spinal cord injury, and administration of GM1 alone had the highest scores on the BMS and MFS scales.
Palavras-chave
Erythropoietin, GM1 ganglioside, Spinal cord compression, Spinal cord, Mice
Referências
  1. Amar AP, 1999, NEUROSURGERY, V44, P1027, DOI 10.1097/00006123-199905000-00052
  2. Basso DM, 2006, J NEUROTRAUM, V23, P635, DOI 10.1089/neu.2006.23.635
  3. Basso DM, 1996, J NEUROTRAUM, V13, P343, DOI 10.1089/neu.1996.13.343
  4. Beattie MS, 2000, J NEUROTRAUM, V17, P915, DOI 10.1089/neu.2000.17.915
  5. Borges PA, 2018, CLINICS, V73, DOI 10.6061/clinics/2018/e293
  6. Brasil. Ministerio da Ciencia Tecnologia Inovacoes e Comunicacoes, 2018, RESOLUCAON 37 DIRETR
  7. Butovsky O, 2007, MOL CELL NEUROSCI, V35, P490, DOI 10.1016/j.mcn.2007.04.009
  8. Cohrs G, 2018, J NEUROTRAUM, V35, P593, DOI 10.1089/neu.2017.4981
  9. Coulson-Thomas VJ, 2016, J BIOL CHEM, V291, P19939, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M115.710673
  10. CUELLO AC, 1989, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V86, P2056, DOI 10.1073/pnas.86.6.2056
  11. dos Santos GB, 2011, ACTA ORTOP BRAS, V19, P87, DOI 10.1590/S1413-78522011000200005
  12. Fang XQ, 2009, CHINESE MED J-PEKING, V122, P1631, DOI 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2009.14.006
  13. Farooque M, 2000, ACTA NEUROPATHOL, V100, P13, DOI 10.1007/s004010051187
  14. Fawcett JW, 1999, BRAIN RES BULL, V49, P377, DOI 10.1016/S0361-9230(99)00072-6
  15. Gebrin AS, 1997, REV BRAS ORTOP, V32, P103
  16. Hagg T, 2006, J NEUROTRAUM, V23, P264, DOI 10.1089/neu.2006.23.263
  17. Hong ZH, 2012, NEUROL RES, V34, P85, DOI 10.1179/1743132811Y.0000000026
  18. Jantzie LL, 2013, PEDIATR RES, V74, P658, DOI 10.1038/pr.2013.155
  19. Li JS, 2006, J NEUROSURG-SPINE, V4, P165, DOI 10.3171/spi.2006.4.2.165
  20. Marcon RM, 2016, CLINICS, V71, P351, DOI 10.6061/clinics/2016(06)11
  21. Marcon RM, 2010, ACTA ORTOP BRAS, V18, P26, DOI 10.1590/S1413-78522010000100005
  22. Nekoui A, 2015, ANESTH PAIN MED, V5
  23. Nessler JA, 2006, J NEUROTRAUM, V23, P882, DOI 10.1089/neu.2006.23.882
  24. Ozkunt O, 2017, J ORTHOP SURG-HONG K, V25, DOI 10.1177/2309499017739481
  25. Ray SK, 2001, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V939, P436
  26. Robertson CS, 2012, J NEUROTRAUM, V29, P1156, DOI 10.1089/neu.2011.1827
  27. Sekiguchi Y, 2003, SPINE, V28, P2577, DOI 10.1097/01.BRS.0000096674.12519.12
  28. SHARMA HS, 1993, NEUROSCIENCE, V57, P443, DOI 10.1016/0306-4522(93)90076-R
  29. Sosa I, 2005, EXP NEUROL, V195, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.04.016
  30. WALKER JB, 1993, NEUROSCI LETT, V161, P174, DOI 10.1016/0304-3940(93)90287-U
  31. Zhang L, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011016
  32. Zhao L, 2016, EXP THER MED, V12, P3680, DOI 10.3892/etm.2016.3832