Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/5240
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP-
dc.contributor.authorMANTOVANI, Celia-
dc.contributor.authorLABATE, Cybelli Morello-
dc.contributor.authorSPONHOLZ JR., Alcion-
dc.contributor.authorMARQUES, Joao Mazzoncini de Azevedo-
dc.contributor.authorGUAPO, Vinicius Guandalini-
dc.contributor.authorSANTOS, Maria Eugenia de Simone Brito dos-
dc.contributor.authorPAZIN-FILHO, Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorDEL-BEN, Cristina Marta-
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-25T22:03:02Z-
dc.date.available2014-04-25T22:03:02Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, v.33, n.3, p.306-312, 2013-
dc.identifier.issn0271-0749-
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/5240-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Psychomotor agitation can be associated with a wide range of medical conditions. Although clinical practice advocates the use of several drugs for the management of psychomotor agitation, there are still very few controlled studies comparing the profiles of action and the adverse effects of different drugs that induce tranquilization. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of 4 low-dose pharmacological interventions used to control psychomotor agitation guided by the clinical response. Methods: Using a randomized, rated-blind design, 100 agitated patients were assigned to receive 1 of 4 treatments: haloperidol (2.5 mg) + promethazine (25 mg) (HLP + PMZ), haloperidol (2.5 mg) + midazolam (7.5 mg) (HLP + MID), ziprasidone (10 mg) (ZIP), or olanzapine (10 mg) (OLP). Patients were evaluated just before the intervention and after 30, 60, and 90 minutes, using the Agitation-Calmness Evaluating Scale. Adverse effects were assessed within 24 hours after the intervention, using selected items from the UKU Scale (Ugvalg Klinisk Undersgelser Side Effect Scale). According to the clinical indication, medication could be repeated twice after the first injection. Data were analyzed using general linear model with repeated measures and logistic regression. Results: All treatment options promoted a reduction in agitation, without causing excessive sedation, although a lower reduction in agitation was observed with HLP + PMZ and ZIP compared with HLP + MID and OLZ. The need for an additional dose of medication was observed in 22 patients, and only 8 remained agitated during the entire 90-minute period. A higher risk for the development of extrapyramidal symptoms within the following 24 hours was observed with HLP + PMZ. Discussion: Low doses of haloperidol combined with midazolam can be as effective as olanzapine in reducing psychomotor agitation without increasing the risk of extrapyramidal effects. Because of the higher risk for the occurrence of extrapyramidal symptoms, the combination of haloperidol with promethazine should be considered a second-line treatment option.-
dc.description.sponsorshipCristalia-
dc.description.sponsorshipEurofarma-
dc.description.sponsorshipServier-
dc.description.sponsorshipLundbeck-
dc.description.sponsorshipGlaxoSmithKline-
dc.description.sponsorshipPfizer-
dc.description.sponsorshipWyeth-
dc.description.sponsorshipLilly-Boehringer-
dc.description.sponsorshipAstraZeneca-
dc.description.sponsorshipJanssen Cilag-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Psychopharmacology-
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess-
dc.subjectpsychomotor agitation-
dc.subjectaggression-
dc.subjectviolent patient-
dc.subjectmanagement of aggression-
dc.subjectacute agitation management-
dc.subject.otherhaloperidol plus promethazine-
dc.subject.otherneuroleptic malignant syndrome-
dc.subject.otherrapid tranquilization-
dc.subject.otheremergency settings-
dc.subject.othermidazolam-
dc.subject.otherlorazepam-
dc.subject.otherschizophrenia-
dc.subject.otherziprasidone-
dc.subject.otherolanzapine-
dc.subject.otherplacebo-
dc.titleAre Low Doses of Antipsychotics Effective in the Management of Psychomotor Agitation? A Randomized, Rated-Blind Trial of 4 Intramuscular Interventions-
dc.typearticle-
dc.rights.holderCopyright LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/JCP.0b013e3182900fd6-
dc.identifier.pmid23609398-
dc.subject.wosPharmacology & Pharmacy-
dc.subject.wosPsychiatry-
dc.type.categoryoriginal article-
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion-
hcfmusp.author.externalMANTOVANI, Celia:Univ Sao Paulo, Div Psychiat, Dept Neurosci & Behav, Sao Paulo, Brazil-
hcfmusp.author.externalLABATE, Cybelli Morello:Univ Sao Paulo, Div Psychiat, Dept Neurosci & Behav, Sao Paulo, Brazil-
hcfmusp.author.externalSPONHOLZ JR., Alcion:Univ Sao Paulo, Div Psychiat, Dept Neurosci & Behav, Sao Paulo, Brazil-
hcfmusp.author.externalMARQUES, Joao Mazzoncini de Azevedo:Univ Sao Paulo, Div Psychiat, Dept Neurosci & Behav, Sao Paulo, Brazil-
hcfmusp.author.externalGUAPO, Vinicius Guandalini:Univ Sao Paulo, Div Psychiat, Dept Neurosci & Behav, Sao Paulo, Brazil-
hcfmusp.author.externalSANTOS, Maria Eugenia de Simone Brito dos:Univ Sao Paulo, Div Psychiat, Dept Neurosci & Behav, Sao Paulo, Brazil-
hcfmusp.author.externalPAZIN-FILHO, Antonio:Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Internal Med, Div Emergency, Fac Med Ribeirao Preto,Sch Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil-
hcfmusp.description.beginpage306-
hcfmusp.description.endpage312-
hcfmusp.description.issue3-
hcfmusp.description.volume33-
hcfmusp.origemWOS-
hcfmusp.origem.id2-s2.0-84877575553-
hcfmusp.origem.idWOS:000318871400004-
hcfmusp.publisher.cityPHILADELPHIA-
hcfmusp.publisher.countryUSA-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAlexander J, 2004, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V185, P63, DOI 10.1192/bjp.185.1.63-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAllen MH, 2005, J PSYCHIAT PRACT S1, V11, P110-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAllen Michael H, 2005, J Psychiatr Pract, V11 Suppl 1, P5, DOI 10.1097/00131746-200511001-00002-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAndrezina R, 2006, PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, V188, P281, DOI 10.1007/s00213-006-0541-x-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBaldacara L, 2011, REV BRAS PSIQUIATR, V33, P30, DOI 10.1590/S1516-44462011000100008-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBattaglia J, 1997, AM J EMERG MED, V15, P335, DOI 10.1016/S0735-6757(97)90119-4-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBieniek SA, 1998, PHARMACOTHERAPY, V18, P57-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCanas F, 2007, EUR NEUROPSYCHOPHARM, V17, pS108, DOI 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2007.02.004-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCastle DJ, 2009, WORLD J BIOL PSYCHIA, V10, P43, DOI 10.1080/15622970802688051-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceChan-Tack KM, 1999, SOUTHERN MED J, V92, P1017-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceChaves AC, 1998, REV PSIQUIATR CLIN, V25, P337-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDel-Ben Cristina Marta, 2005, Rev Bras Psiquiatr, V27, P58, DOI 10.1590/S1516-44462005000100013-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHuf G, 2007, BRIT MED J, V335, P869, DOI 10.1136/bmj.39339.448819.AE-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKAY SR, 1987, SCHIZOPHRENIA BULL, V13, P261-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLingjaerde O, 1987, Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl, V334, P1-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMartel M, 2005, ACAD EMERG MED, V12, P1167, DOI 10.1197/j.aem.2005.07.017-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMcAllister-Williams RH, 2002, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V180, P485, DOI 10.1192/bjp.180.6.485-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMeehan KM, 2002, NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOL, V26, P494, DOI 10.1016/S0893-133X(01)00365-7-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMendhekar DN, 2005, AUST NZ J PSYCHIAT, V39, P310, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1614.2005.01568.x-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNobay F, 2004, ACAD EMERG MED, V11, P744, DOI 10.1197/j.aem.2003.06.015-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSuzuki A, 2003, THER DRUG MONIT, V25, P192, DOI 10.1097/00007691-200304000-00008-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceVass A, 2002, BRIT MED J, V324, P1413-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWYANT M, 1990, PSYCHOPHARMACOL BULL, V26, P126-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceYildiz A, 2003, EMERG MED J, V20, P339, DOI 10.1136/emj.20.4.339-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceZimbroff DL, 2008, CNS DRUGS, V22, P199, DOI 10.2165/00023210-200822030-00002-
dc.description.indexMEDLINE-
hcfmusp.remissive.sponsorshipAstraZeneca-
hcfmusp.remissive.sponsorshipGlaxoSmithKline-
hcfmusp.remissive.sponsorshipJanssen-
hcfmusp.remissive.sponsorshipLilly-
hcfmusp.remissive.sponsorshipLundbeck-
hcfmusp.remissive.sponsorshipPfizer-
hcfmusp.remissive.sponsorshipServier-
hcfmusp.remissive.sponsorshipAstraZeneca-
hcfmusp.remissive.sponsorshipGlaxoSmithKline-
hcfmusp.remissive.sponsorshipJanssen-
hcfmusp.remissive.sponsorshipLilly-
hcfmusp.remissive.sponsorshipLundbeck-
hcfmusp.remissive.sponsorshipPfizer-
hcfmusp.remissive.sponsorshipServier-
hcfmusp.remissive.sponsorshipBoehringer-
hcfmusp.citation.scopus37-
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-03-29-
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Instituto Central - HC/ICHC


Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art_DEL-BEN_Are_Low_Doses_of_Antipsychotics_Effective_in_the_2013.PDF
  Restricted Access
publishedVersion (English)349.28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.