Joint loading decreased by inexpensive and minimalist footwear in elderly women with knee osteoarthritis during stair descent

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_SACCO_Joint_loading_decreased_by_inexpensive_and_minimalist_footwear_2012.PDF (120.58 KB)
Citações na Scopus
23
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2012
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
WILEY-BLACKWELL
Autores
Citação
ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, v.64, n.3, p.368-374, 2012
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objective Previous studies indicate that flexible footwear, which mimics the biomechanics of walking barefoot, results in decreased knee loads in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) during walking. However, the effect of flexible footwear on other activities of daily living, such as descending stairs, remains unclear. Our objective was to evaluate the influence of inexpensive and minimalist footwear (Moleca) on knee adduction moment (KAM) during stair descent of elderly women with and without knee OA. Methods. Thirty-four elderly women were equally divided into an OA group and a control group (CG). Stair descent was evaluated in barefoot condition, while wearing the Moleca, and while wearing heeled shoes. Kinematics and ground reaction forces were measured to calculate KAM by using inverse dynamics. Results. The OA group experienced a higher KAM during midstance under the barefoot condition (233.3%; P = 0.028), the Moleca (379.2%; P = 0.004), and heeled shoes (217.6%; P = 0.007). The OA group had a similar knee load during early, mid, and late stance with the Moleca compared with the barefoot condition. Heeled shoes increased the knee loads during the early-stance (versus barefoot [16.7%; P < 0.001] and versus the Moleca [15.5%; P < 0.001]), midstance (versus barefoot [8.6%; P = 0.014] and versus the Moleca [9.5%; P = 0.010]), and late-stance phase (versus barefoot [10.6%; P = 0.003] and versus the Moleca [9.2%; P < 0.001]). In the CG, the Moleca produced a knee load similar to the barefoot condition only during the early-stance phase. Conclusion. Besides the general foot protection, the inexpensive and minimalist footwear contributes to decreasing knee loads in elderly women with OA during stair descent. The loads are similar to the barefoot condition and effectively decreased when compared with heeled shoes.
Palavras-chave
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/595
Referências
  1. ALTMAN R, 1986, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V29, P1039, DOI 10.1002/art.1780290816
  2. ANDRIACCHI TP, 1980, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V62, P749
  3. BELLAMY N, 1988, J RHEUMATOL, V15, P1833
  4. Campbell K, 1987, EXPERT VISION DATA A
  5. Chen CPC, 2003, AM J PHYS MED REHAB, V82, P307, DOI 10.1097/01.PHM.0000056987.33630.56
  6. Chiari L, 2005, GAIT POSTURE, V21, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.04.004
  7. Childs JD, 2004, CLIN BIOMECH, V19, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.08.007
  8. Costigan PA, 2002, GAIT POSTURE, V16, P31, DOI 10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00201-6
  9. Dempster WT, 1955, SPACE REQUIREMENTS S, P55
  10. Doherty M, 2001, LANCET, V358, P775, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06006-8
  11. Ehara Y, 1997, GAIT POSTURE, V5, P251, DOI 10.1016/S0966-6362(96)01093-4
  12. Erhart JC, 2008, J BIOMECH, V41, P2720, DOI 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.06.016
  13. FREY C, 1993, FOOT ANKLE, V14, P78
  14. GUCCIONE AA, 1994, PHYS THER, V74, P408
  15. Hamel KA, 2004, J AM GERIATR SOC, V52, P563, DOI 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52162.x
  16. Hinman RS, 2002, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V83, P1080, DOI 10.1053/apmr.2002.33068
  17. Hunt MA, 2006, J BIOMECH, V39, P2213, DOI 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.07.002
  18. KELLGREN JH, 1957, ANN RHEUM DIS, V16, P494, DOI 10.1136/ard.16.4.494
  19. Kemp G, 2008, ARTHRIT RHEUM-ARTHR, V59, P609, DOI 10.1002/art.23578
  20. Kerrigan DC, 2005, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V86, P871, DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.09.018
  21. Kerrigan DC, 2001, LANCET, V357, P1097, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04312-9
  22. Kerrigan DC, 1998, LANCET, V351, P1399, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11281-8
  23. Ly QH, 2010, J BIOMECH, V43, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.08.029
  24. Mazzuca SA, 2001, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V44, P1786, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(200108)44:8<1786::AID-ART315>3.0.CO;2-L
  25. MCFADYEN BJ, 1988, J BIOMECH, V21, P733, DOI 10.1016/0021-9290(88)90282-5
  26. Miyazaki T, 2002, ANN RHEUM DIS, V61, P617, DOI 10.1136/ard.61.7.617
  27. Mundermann A, 2005, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V52, P2835, DOI 10.1002/art.21262
  28. Mundermann A, 2004, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V50, P1172, DOI 10.1002/art.20132
  29. Neogi T, 2010, ANN RHEUM DIS, V69, P841, DOI 10.1136/ard.2009.110114
  30. Nurse MA, 2001, CLIN BIOMECH, V16, P719, DOI 10.1016/S0268-0033(01)00090-0
  31. Peat G, 2001, ANN RHEUM DIS, V60, P91, DOI 10.1136/ard.60.2.91
  32. Perry J., 1992, GAIT ANAL NORMAL PAT
  33. Sacco ICN, 2010, BMC MUSCULOSKEL DIS, V11, DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-11-24
  34. Shakoor N, 2006, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V54, P2923, DOI 10.1002/art.22123
  35. Shakoor N, 2010, ARTHRIT CARE RES, V62, P917, DOI 10.1002/acr.20165
  36. Shakoor N, 2004, BEST PRACT RES CL RH, V18, P173, DOI 10.1016/j.berh.2004.02.005
  37. Shakoor N, 2008, ARTHRIT RHEUM-ARTHR, V59, P1214, DOI 10.1002/art.24017
  38. Sharma L, 1998, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V41, P1233, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(199807)41:7<1233::AID-ART14>3.0.CO;2-L
  39. Thorp LE, 2006, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V54, P3842, DOI 10.1002/art.22247
  40. Trombini-Souza F, 2011, GAIT POSTURE, V34, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.03.026
  41. Winter DA, 1991, BIOMECHANICS MOTOR C

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MFT
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/IOT
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/34