Working memory improvement with non-invasive brain stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_BRUNONI_Working_memory_improvement_with_non_invasive_brain_stimulation_2014.PDF (2.38 MB)
Citações na Scopus
477
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2014
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
Autores
VANDERHASSELT, Marie-Anne
Citação
BRAIN AND COGNITION, v.86, p.1-9, 2014
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Recent studies have used non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), to increase dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) activity and, consequently, working memory (WM) performance. However, such experiments have yielded mixed results, possibly due to small sample sizes and heterogeneity of outcomes. Therefore, our aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analyses on NIBS studies assessing the n-back task, which is a reliable index for WM. From the first data available to February 2013, we looked for sham-controlled, randomized studies that used NIBS over the DLPFC using the n-back task in PubMed/MEDLINE and other databases. Twelve studies (describing 33 experiments) matched our eligibility criteria. Active vs. sham NIBS was significantly associated with faster response times (RTs), higher percentage of correct responses and lower percentage of error responses. However, meta-regressions showed that tDCS (vs. rTMS) presented only an improvement in RT, and not in accuracy. This could have occurred in part because almost all tDCS studies employed a crossover design, possibly due to the reliable tDCS blinding. Study design was also associated with no improvement in correct responses in the active vs. sham groups. To conclude, rTMS of the DLPFC significantly improved all measures of WM performance whereas tDCS significantly improved RT, but not the percentage of correct and error responses. Mechanistic insights on the role of DLPFC in WM are further discussed, as well as how NIBS techniques could be used in neuropsychiatric samples presenting WM deficits, such as major depression, dementia and schizophrenia.
Palavras-chave
Non-invasive brain stimulation, Repetitive transcranial magnetic, stimulation, Transcranial direct current stimulation, Working memory, N-back task, Prefrontal cortex
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/7839
Referências
  1. Andrews SC, 2011, BRAIN STIMUL, V4, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.brs.2010.06.004
  2. Baddeley A., 1974, PSYCHOL LEARN MOTIV, V8, P47, DOI 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-I
  3. Baddeley A., 1986, WORKING MEMORY
  4. Barch DM, 2003, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V53, P376, DOI 10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01674-8
  5. Barr MS, 2009, NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOL, V34, P2359, DOI 10.1038/npp.2009.79
  6. Barr MS, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0022627
  7. Barr MS, 2013, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V73, P510, DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.08.020
  8. Berryhill ME, 2012, NEUROSCI LETT, V521, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.05.074
  9. Boehringer A, 2013, BRAIN STIMUL, V6, P649, DOI 10.1016/j.brs.2012.10.001
  10. Boggio PS, 2009, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V80, P444, DOI 10.1136/jnnp.2007.141853
  11. Boggio PS, 2005, MOVEMENT DISORD, V20, P1178, DOI 10.1002/mds.20508
  12. Boggio PS, 2006, J NEUROL SCI, V249, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.jns.2006.05.062
  13. Brunoni AR, 2012, BRAIN STIMUL, V5, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.brs.2011.03.002
  14. Burt T, 2002, INT J NEUROPSYCHOPH, V5, P73, DOI 10.1017/S1461145702002791
  15. Cohen J, 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
  16. Daskalakis ZJ, 2008, CLIN EEG NEUROSCI, V39, P150
  17. Datta A, 2009, BRAIN STIMUL, V2, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.brs.2009.03.005
  18. Dayan E, 2013, NAT NEUROSCI, V16, P838, DOI 10.1038/nn.3422
  19. Demirtas-Tatlidede A., 2012, NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
  20. D'Esposito M, 2000, EXP BRAIN RES, V133, P3, DOI 10.1007/s002210000395
  21. DESPOSITO M, 1995, NATURE, V378, P279, DOI 10.1038/378279a0
  22. Egger M, 1997, BRIT MED J, V315, P629
  23. Esslinger C., 2012, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
  24. Fregni F, 2007, NAT CLIN PRACT NEURO, V3, P383, DOI 10.1038/ncpneuro0530
  25. Fregni F, 2005, EXP BRAIN RES, V166, P23, DOI 10.1007/s00221-005-2334-6
  26. Gaudeau-Bosma C., 2012, BRAIN STIMULATION
  27. George MS, 2010, NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOL, V35, P301, DOI 10.1038/npp.2009.87
  28. Grosbras MH, 2003, EUR J NEUROSCI, V18, P3121, DOI 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.03055.x
  29. Guse B, 2013, BEHAV BRAIN RES, V237, P300, DOI 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.09.034
  30. Hallett M, 2007, NEURON, V55, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.026
  31. Hedges LV, 1985, STAT METHODS METAANA
  32. Heimrath K, 2012, Front Psychiatry, V3, P56, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00056
  33. Higgins JPT, 2009, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
  34. Hofmann W, 2012, TRENDS COGN SCI, V16, P174, DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2012.01.006
  35. Imm JH, 2008, NEUROREPORT, V19, P99, DOI 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f36f91
  36. Keeser D., 2013, NEUROIMAGE, V55, P644
  37. Liberati A, 2009, PLOS MED, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
  38. Mansouri FA, 2009, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V10, P141, DOI 10.1038/nrn2538
  39. Meiron O., 2012, BRAIN STIMULATION
  40. Milian M.J., 2012, NAT REV DRUG DISCOV, V11, P141
  41. Mottaghy FM, 2002, PSYCHIAT RES-NEUROIM, V115, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0925-4927(02)00032-X
  42. Mulquiney PG, 2011, CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V122, P2384, DOI 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.05.009
  43. Mylius V, 2012, EUR J PAIN, V16, P974, DOI 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2011.00105.x
  44. Nitsche MA, 2003, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V15, P619, DOI 10.1162/089892903321662994
  45. Nitsche MA, 2003, SUPPL CLIN NEUROPHYS, V56, P255
  46. Nitsche MA, 2000, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V527, P633, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x
  47. Nitsche MA, 2008, BRAIN STIMUL, V1, P206, DOI 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004
  48. Ochsner KN, 2005, TRENDS COGN SCI, V9, P242, DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.010
  49. Oliveira JF, 2013, NEUROSCI LETT, V537, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.01.023
  50. Oliveri M, 2001, NEUROLOGY, V57, P1338
  51. Owen AM, 2005, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V25, P46, DOI 10.1002/hbm.20131
  52. PURPURA DP, 1965, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V28, P166
  53. Radhu N, 2013, CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V124, P1309, DOI 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.01.014
  54. Radman T, 2009, BRAIN STIMUL, V2, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.brs.2009.03.007
  55. Rossi S, 2009, CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V120, P2008, DOI 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016
  56. Sandrini M, 2012, NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, V50, P396, DOI 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.011
  57. Sandrini M, 2011, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V35, P516, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.06.005
  58. Siegle GJ, 2007, COGNITIVE THER RES, V31, P235, DOI 10.1007/s10608-006-9118-6
  59. Silvanto J, 2008, TRENDS COGN SCI, V12, P447, DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.004
  60. Silvanto J, 2008, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V99, P2725, DOI 10.1152/jn.01392.2007
  61. Soto D, 2012, J NEUROSCI, V32, P3447, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6243-11.2012
  62. Stagg CJ, 2011, NEUROSCIENTIST, V17, P37, DOI 10.1177/1073858410386614
  63. Stahl S. M., 2009, STAHLS ESSENTIAL PSY
  64. Teo Florence, 2011, Front Psychiatry, V2, P45, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2011.00045
  65. Utz KS, 2010, NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, V48, P2789, DOI 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.002
  66. van de Ven V, 2013, BEHAV BRAIN RES, V236, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.08.001
  67. Wallace TL, 2011, PHARMACOL BIOCHEM BE, V99, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.pbb.2011.03.022

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/IPq
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/27