PRISCILA MARA LORENCINI SELINGARDI
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
LIM/45 - Laboratório de Fisiopatologia Neurocirúrgica, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
5 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 5 de 5
- Does Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Improve Cognition in Major Depressive Disorder? A Systematic Review(2014) TORTELLA, Gabriel; SELINGARDI, Priscila M. L.; MORENO, Marina L.; VERONEZI, Beatriz P.; BRUNONI, Andre R.Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, such as repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have been increasingly used in different contexts to improve cognitive performance and ameliorate depression symptoms. Considering that major depression is usually accompanied by cognitive deficits, NIBS technique could be also helpful to improve cognition in depressed patients. In this systematic review, we researched for articles published in PubMed/MEDLINE from the first date available to June 2014 that assessed cognitive performance in patients with depression before and after NIBS. Out of 191 references, 25 (16 for rTMS and 9 for tDCS) studies matched our eligibility criteria. Non-invasive brain stimulation interventions, such as rTMS and tDCS seem to be a promising tool for cognitive enhancement in MDD, although several issues and biases (e.g., blinding issues, tests without correction for multiple comparisons, placebo effects and exploratory analyses, practice effects) hinder us to conclude that NIBS technique improve cognition in patients with depression. We discussed possible shortcomings of the included studies, such as the use of different depression treatment protocols, the possibility that some findings were false-positive results of the employed cognitive tasks and whether cognition improvement could have been an epiphenomenon secondary to depression improvement. To conclude, whereas these non-pharmacological, non-invasive techniques are particularly appealing for cognitive improvement in depression, further studies are still warranted to disentangle whether NIBS technique induce positive effects on cognition beyond their antidepressant effects.
- Insular and anterior cingulate cortex deep stimulation for central neuropathic pain Disassembling the percept of pain(2019) GALHARDONI, Ricardo Geront; SILVA, Valquiria Aparecida da; GARCIA-LARREA, Luis; DALE, Camila; BAPTISTA, Abrahao F.; BARBOSA, Luciana Mendonca; MENEZES, Luciana Mendes Bahia; SIQUEIRA, Silvia R. D. T. de; VALERIO, Fernanda; ROSI JR., Jefferson; RODRIGUES, Antonia Lilian de Lima; FERNANDES, Diego Toledo Reis Mendes; SELINGARDI, Priscila Mara Lorencini; MARCOLIN, Marco Antonio; DURAN, Fabio Luis de Souza; ONO, Carla Rachel; LUCATO, Leandro Tavares; FERNANDES, Ana Mercia B. L.; SILVA, Fabio E. F. da; YENG, Lin T.; BRUNONI, Andre R.; BUCHPIGUEL, Carlos A.; TEIXEIRA, Manoel J.; ANDRADE, Daniel Ciampi deObjective To compare the analgesic effects of stimulation of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) or the posterior superior insula (PSI) against sham deep (d) repetitive (r) transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in patients with central neuropathic pain (CNP) after stroke or spinal cord injury in a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled, 3-arm parallel study. Methods Participants were randomly allocated into the active PSI-rTMS, ACC-rTMS, sham-PSI-rTMS, or sham-ACC-rTMS arms. Stimulations were performed for 12 weeks, and a comprehensive clinical and pain assessment, psychophysics, and cortical excitability measurements were performed at baseline and during treatment. The main outcome of the study was pain intensity (numeric rating scale [NRS]) after the last stimulation session. Results Ninety-eight patients (age 55.02 +/- 12.13 years) completed the study. NRS score was not significantly different between groups at the end of the study. Active rTMS treatments had no significant effects on pain interference with daily activities, pain dimensions, neuropathic pain symptoms, mood, medication use, cortical excitability measurements, or quality of life. Heat pain threshold was significantly increased after treatment in the PSI-dTMS group from baseline (1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09-3.06]) compared to sham-dTMS (-1.02, 95% CI -2.10 to 0.04, p = 0.014), and ACC-dTMS caused a significant decrease in anxiety scores (-2.96, 95% CI -4.1 to -1.7]) compared to sham-dTMS (-0.78, 95% CI -1.9 to 0.3; p = 0.018). Conclusions ACC- and PSI-dTMS were not different from sham-dTMS for pain relief in CNP despite a significant antinociceptive effect after insular stimulation and anxiolytic effects of ACC-dTMS. These results showed that the different dimensions of pain can be modulated in humans noninvasively by directly stimulating deeper SNC cortical structures without necessarily affecting clinical pain per se.
- Author response: Insular and anterior cingulate cortex deep stimulation for central neuropathic pain: Disassembling the percept of pain(2020) ANDRADE, Daniel Ciampi de; GALHARDONI, Ricardo; SILVA, Valquiria Aparecida da; GARCIA-LARREA, Luis; DALE, Camila; BAPTISTA, Abrahao F.; BARBOSA, Luciana Mendonca; MENEZES, Luciana Mendes Bahia; SIQUEIRA, Silvia R. D. T. de; VALERIO, Fernanda; ROSI, Jefferson; RODRIGUES, Antonia Lilian de Lima; FERNANDES, Diego Toledo Reis Mendes; SELINGARDI, Priscila Mara Lorencini; MARCOLIN, Marco Antonio; DURAN, Fabio Luis de Souza; ONO, Carla Rachel; LUCATO, Leandro Tavares; FERNANDES, Ana Mercia B. L.; SILVA, Fabio E. F. da; YENG, Lin T.; BRUNONI, Andre R.; BUCHPIGUEL, Carlos A.; TEIXEIRA, Manoel J.
- Long-term deep-TMS does not negatively affect cognitive functions in stroke and spinal cord injury patients with central neuropathic pain(2019) SELINGARDI, Priscila Mara Lorencini; RODRIGUES, Antonia Lilian de Lima; SILVA, Valquiria Aparecida da; FERNANDES, Diego Toledo Reis Mendes; ROSI JR., Jefferson; MARCOLIN, Marco Antonio; YENG, Lin T.; BRUNONI, Andre R.; TEIXEIRA, Manoel J.; GALHARDONI, Ricardo; ANDRADE, Daniel Ciampi de
- Transcranial direct current stimulation in psychiatric disorders(2015) TORTELLA, Gabriel; CASATI, Roberta; APARICIO, Luana V. M.; MANTOVANI, Antonio; SENCO, Natasha; D'URSO, Giordano; BRUNELIN, Jerome; GUARIENTI, Fabiana; SELINGARDI, Priscila Mara Lorencini; MUSZKAT, Debora; PEREIRA JUNIOR, Bernardo de Sampaio; VALIENGO, Leandro; MOFFA, Adriano H.; SIMIS, Marcel; BORRIONE, Lucas; BRUNONI, Andre R.The interest in non-invasive brain stimulation techniques is increasing in recent years. Among these techniques, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been the subject of great interest among researchers because of its easiness to use, low cost, benign profile of side effects and encouraging results of research in the field. This interest has generated several studies and randomized clinical trials, particularly in psychiatry. In this review, we provide a summary of the development of the technique and its mechanism of action as well as a review of the methodological aspects of randomized clinical trials in psychiatry, including studies in affective disorders, schizophrenia, obsessive compulsive disorder, child psychiatry and substance use disorder. Finally, we provide an overview of tDCS use in cognitive enhancement as well as a discussion regarding its clinical use and regulatory and ethical issues. Although many promising results regarding tDCS efficacy were described, the total number of studies is still low, highlighting the need of further studies aiming to replicate these findings in larger samples as to provide a definite picture regarding tDCS efficacy in psychiatry.