FABIO SANDOLI DE BRITO JUNIOR
Índice h a partir de 2011
11
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
37 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 10 de 37
- Myocardial Injury After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Reoperation(2024) MARCHI, Mauricio Felippi de Sa; ROSA, Vitor Emer Egypto; NICZ, Pedro Felipe Gomes; FONSECA, Jose Honorio de Almeida Palma da; CALOMENI, Pedro; CHIODINI, Fernando; SAMPAIO, Roney Orismar; POMERANTZEFF, Pablo Maria Alberto; VIEIRA, Marcelo de Campos; TARASOUTCHI, Flavio; MIEGHEM, Nicolas M. Van; BRITO, Fabio Sandoli de; ABIZAID, Alexandre; RIBEIRO, Henrique BarbosaThis study aimed to evaluate the incidence and clinical implications of myocardial injury, as determined by cardiac biomarker increase, in patients who underwent mitral bioprosthesis dysfunction treatment with transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) versus surgical mitral valve replacement reoperation (SMVR-REDO). Between 2014 and 2023, 310 patients with mitral bioprosthesis failure were included (90 and 220 patients for TMVR and SMVR-REDO, respectively). Multivariable analysis and propensity score matching were performed to adjust for the intergroup differences in baseline characteristics. Creatinine kinase-MB (CK-MB) and cardiac troponin I (cTn) were collected at baseline and 6 to 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after intervention. The cardiac biomarkers values were evaluated in relation to their reference values. The outcomes were determined according to the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria. CK-MB and cTn increased above the reference level in almost all patients after SMVR-REDO and TMVR (100% vs 94%, respectively), with the peak occurring within 6 to 12 hours. SMVR-REDO was associated with a two- to threefold higher increase in cardiac biomarkers. After 30 days, the mortality rates were 13.3% in the TMVR and 16.8% in the SMVR-REDO groups. At a median follow-up of 19 months, the mortality rates were 21.1% in the TMVR and 17.7% in the SMVR-REDO groups. Left ventricular ejection fraction, estimated glomerular filtration rate, CK-MB, and cTn were predictors of mortality. In conclusion, some degree of myocardial injury occurred systematically after the treatment of mitral bioprosthetic degeneration, especially after SMVR, and higher CK-MB and cTn levels were associated with increased cumulative late mortality, regardless of the approach.
- Risk prediction in patients with classical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis undergoing surgical intervention(2023) TESSARI, Fernanda Castiglioni; LOPES, Maria Antonieta Albanez A. de M.; CAMPOS, Carlos M. M.; ROSA, Vitor Emer Egypto; SAMPAIO, Roney Orismar; SOARES, Frederico Jose Mendes Mendonca; LOPES, Rener Romulo Souza; NAZZETTA, Daniella Cian; JR, Fabio Sandoli de Brito; RIBEIRO, Henrique Barbosa; VIEIRA, Marcelo L. C.; JR, Wilson Mathias; FERNANDES, Joao Ricardo Cordeiro; LOPES, Mariana Pezzute; ROCHITTE, Carlos E. E.; POMERANTZEFF, Pablo M. A.; ABIZAID, Alexandre; TARASOUTCHI, FlavioIntroductionClassical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (LFLG-AS) is an advanced stage of aortic stenosis, which has a poor prognosis with medical treatment and a high operative mortality after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). There is currently a paucity of information regarding the current prognosis of classical LFLG-AS patients undergoing SAVR and the lack of a reliable risk assessment tool for this particular subset of AS patients. The present study aims to assess mortality predictors in a population of classical LFLG-AS patients undergoing SAVR.MethodsThis is a prospective study including 41 consecutive classical LFLG-AS patients (aortic valve area & LE;1.0 cm(2), mean transaortic gradient <40 mmHg, left ventricular ejection fraction <50%). All patients underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE), 3D echocardiography, and T1 mapping cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Patients with pseudo-severe aortic stenosis were excluded. Patients were divided into groups according to the median value of the mean transaortic gradient (& LE;25 and >25 mmHg). All-cause, intraprocedural, 30-day, and 1-year mortality rates were evaluated.ResultsAll of the patients had degenerative aortic stenosis, with a median age of 66 (60-73) years; most of the patients were men (83%). The median EuroSCORE II was 2.19% (1.5%-4.78%), and the median STS was 2.19% (1.6%-3.99%). On DSE, 73.2% had flow reserve (FR), i.e., an increase in stroke volume & GE;20% during DSE, with no significant differences between groups. On CMR, late gadolinium enhancement mass was lower in the group with mean transaortic gradient >25 mmHg [2.0 (0.0-8.9) g vs. 8.5 (2.3-15.0) g; p = 0.034), and myocardium extracellular volume (ECV) and indexed ECV were similar between groups. The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were 14.6% and 43.8%, respectively. The median follow-up was 4.1 (0.3-5.1) years. By multivariate analysis adjusted for FR, only the mean transaortic gradient was an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio: 0.923, 95% confidence interval: 0.864-0.986, p = 0.019). A mean transaortic gradient & LE;25 mmHg was associated with higher all-cause mortality rates (log-rank p = 0.038), while there was no difference in mortality regarding FR status (log-rank p = 0.114).ConclusionsIn patients with classical LFLG-AS undergoing SAVR, the mean transaortic gradient was the only independent mortality predictor in patients with LFLG-AS, especially if & LE;25 mmHg. The absence of left ventricular FR had no prognostic impact on long-term outcomes.
- Seattle Angina Pectoris Questionnaire and Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina Categories in the Assessment of Total Coronary Atherosclerotic Burden(2021) GUIMARAES, Welingson Vanucci Negreiros; NICZ, Pedro Felipe Gomes; GARCIA-GARCIA, Hector M.; ABIZAID, Alexandre; SANTOS, Luciano de Moura; ROSA, Vitor E.; RIBEIRO, Marcelo Harada; MEHTA, Sameer; RIBEIRO, Expedito; LEMOS, Pedro A.; BRITO JR., Fabio S.; HAJJAR, Ludhmila; KALIL FILHO, Roberto; CAMPOS, Carlos M.The patient reported angina measurement with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) has shown to have prognostic implications and became an endpoint in clinical trials. Our objective was to study physician-reported and SAQ severity with the total coronary atherosclerotic burden as assessed by 4 angiographic scores. We prospectively analyzed data of consecutive patients scheduled for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina categories was used as physician-reported angina. SAQ domains were categorized as severe (0 to 24), moderate 25 to 75 and mild angina (>75). All angina assessments were done before coronary angiography. Gensini, Syntax, Friesinger, and Sullivan angiographic scores were used for total atherosclerotic burden quantification: 261 patients were included in the present analysis. The median age was 66.0 (59.0 to 71.8) years, 53.6% were male and 43.7% had diabetes. The median SYNTAX score was 6.0 (0 to 18.0). The worse the symptoms of CCS categories, the more severe was the atherosclerotic burden in all angiographic scores: SYNTAX (p = 0.01); Gensini (p<0.01); Friesinger (p = 0.02) and Sullivan (p = 0.03). Conversely, SAQ domains were not able to discriminate the severity of CAD in any of the scores. The only exception was the severe SAQ quality of life that had worse Gensini score than the mild SAQ quality of life (p = 0.04). In conclusion, CCS angina categories are related to the total atherosclerotic burden in coronary angiography, by all angiographic scores. SAQ domains should be used as a measure of patient functionality and quality of life but not as a measure of CAD severity. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.
- Improvement of renal function after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with chronic kidney disease(2021) SILVA, Michel V. Lemes da; NUNES FILHO, Antonio C. B.; ROSA, Vitor E. E.; CAIXETA, Adriano; LEMOS NETO, Pedro A.; RIBEIRO, Henrique B.; ALMEIDA, Breno O.; MARIANI JR., Jose; CAMPOS, Carlos M.; ABIZAID, Alexandre A. C.; MANGIONE, Jose A.; SAMPAIO, Roney O.; CARAMORI, Paulo; SARMENTO-LEITE, Rogerio; TARASOUTCHI, Flavio; FRANKEN, Marcelo; BRITO JR., Fabio S. deBackground Chronic kidney disease is commonly found in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and has marked impact in their prognosis. It has been shown however that TAVR may improve renal function by alleviating the hemodynamic barrier imposed by AS. Nevertheless, the predictors of and clinical consequences of renal function improvement are not well established. Our aim was to assess the predictors of improvement of renal function after TAVR. Methods The present work is an analysis of the Brazilian Registry of TAVR, a national non-randomized prospective study with 22 Brazilian centers. Patients with baseline renal dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 60mL/min/1.73m(2)) were stratified according to renal function after TAVR: increase >10% in eGFR were classified as TAVR induced renal function improvement (TIRFI); decrease > 10% in eGFR were classified as acute kidney injury (AKI) and stable renal function (neither criteria). Results A total of 819 consecutive patients with symptomatic severe AS were included. Of these, baseline renal dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 60mL/min/1.73m(2)) was present in 577 (70%) patients. Considering variance in renal function between baseline and at discharge after TAVR procedure, TIRFI was seen in 197 (34.1%) patients, AKI in 203 (35.2%), and stable renal function in 177 (30.7%). The independent predictors of TIRFI were: absence of coronary artery disease (OR: 0.69; 95% CI 0.48-0.98; P = 0.039) and lower baseline eGFR (OR: 0.98; 95% CI 0.97-1.00; P = 0.039). There was no significant difference in 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality between patients with stable renal function or TIRFI. Nonetheless, individuals that had AKI after TAVR presented higher mortality compared with TIRFI and stable renal function groups (29.3% vs. 15.4% vs. 9.5%, respectively; p < 0.001). Conclusions TIRFI was frequently found among baseline impaired renal function individuals but was not associated with improved 1-year outcomes.
- Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Procedures for Bioprosthetic Valve Dysfunction in Patients With Rheumatic vs. Non-Rheumatic Valvular Heart Disease(2021) LOPES, Mariana Pezzute; ROSA, Vitor Emer Egypto; PALMA, Jose Honorio; VIEIRA, Marcelo Luiz Campos; FERNANDES, Joao Ricardo Cordeiro; SANTIS, Antonio de; SPINA, Guilherme Sobreira; FONSECA, Rafael de Jesus; MARCHI, Mauricio F. de Sa; ABIZAID, Alexandre; BRITO, Fabio Sandoli de; TARASOUTCHI, Flavio; SAMPAIO, Roney Orismar; RIBEIRO, Henrique BarbosaBackground: Bioprosthetic heart valve has limited durability and lower long-term performance especially in rheumatic heart disease (RHD) patients that are often subject to multiple redo operations. Minimally invasive procedures, such as transcatheter valve-in-valve (ViV) implantation, may offer an attractive alternative, although data is lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes in rheumatic vs. non-rheumatic patients undergoing ViV procedures for severe bioprosthetic valve dysfunction. Methods: Single center, prospective study, including consecutive patients undergoing transcatheter ViV implantation in aortic, mitral and tricuspid position, from May 2015 to September 2020. RHD was defined according to clinical history, previous echocardiographic and surgical findings. Results: Among 106 patients included, 69 had rheumatic etiology and 37 were non-rheumatic. Rheumatic patients had higher incidence of female sex (73.9 vs. 43.2%, respectively; p = 0.004), atrial fibrillation (82.6 vs. 45.9%, respectively; p < 0.001), and 2 or more prior surgeries (68.1 vs. 32.4%, respectively; p = 0.001). Although, device success was similar between groups (75.4 vs. 89.2% in rheumatic vs. non-rheumatic, respectively; p = 0.148), there was a trend toward higher 30-day mortality rates in the rheumatic patients (21.7 vs. 5.4%, respectively; p = 0.057). Still, at median followup of 20.7 [5.1-30.4] months, cumulative mortality was similar between both groups (p = 0.779). Conclusion: Transcatheter ViV implantation is an acceptable alternative to redo operations in the treatment of patients with RHD and severe bioprosthetic valve dysfunction. Despite similar device success rates, rheumatic patients present higher 30 day mortality rates with good mid-term clinical outcomes. Future studies with a larger number of patients and follow-up are still warranted, to firmly conclude on the role transcatheter ViV procedures in the RHD population.
- Quantitative Assessment of Acute Regurgitation Following TAVR A Multicenter Pooled Analysis of 2,258 Valves(2020) MODOLO, Rodrigo; CHANG, Chun Chin; ABDELGHANI, Mohammad; KAWASHIMA, Hideyuki; ONO, Masafumi; TATEISHI, Hiroki; MIYAZAKI, Yosuke; PIGHI, Michele; WYKRZYKOWSKA, Joanna J.; WINTER, Robbert J. de; RUCK, Andreas; CHIEFFO, Alaide; MOURIK, Martijn S. van; YAMAJI, Kyohei; BRITO JR., Fabio S. de; LEMOS, Pedro A.; AL-KASSOU, Baravan; PIAZZA, Nicolo; TCHETCHE, Didier; SINNING, Jan-Malte; ABDEL-WAHAB, Mohamed; SOLIMAN, Osama; SONDERGAARD, Lars; MYLOTTE, Darren; ONUMA, Yoshinobu; MIEGHEM, Nicolas M. Van; SERRUYS, Patrick W.OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess acute regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement, comparing different implanted transcatheter heart valves. BACKGROUND Regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in fluences all -cause mortality. Thus far, no quantitative comparison of regurgitation among multiple commercially available transcatheter heart valves has been performed. METHODS Aortograms from a multicenter cohort of consecutive 3,976 transcatheter aortic valve replacements were evaluated in this pooled analysis. A total of 2,258 (58.3%) were considered analyzable by an independent academic core laboratory using video densitometry. Results of quantitative regurgitation are shown as percentages. The valves eval- uated were the ACURATE (n = 115), Centera (n = 11), CoreValve (n = 532), Direct Flow Medical (n = 21), Evolut PRO (n = 95), Evolut R (n = 295), Inovare (n = 4), Lotus (n = 546), Lotus Edge (n = 3), SAPIEN XT (n = 239), and SAPIEN 3 (n = 397). For the main analysis, only valves with more than 50 procedures (7 types) were used. RESULTS The Lotus valve had the lowest mean regurgitation (3.5 +/- 4.4%), followed by Evolut PRO (7.4 +/- 6.5%), SAPIEN 3 (7.6 +/- 7.1%), Evolut R (7.9 +/- 7.4%), SAPIEN XT (8.8 +/- 7.5%), ACURATE (9.6 +/- 9.2%) and CoreValve (13.7 +/- 10.7%) (analysis of variance p < 0.001). The only valves that statistically differed from all their counterparts were Lotus (as the lowest regurgitation) and CoreValve (the highest). The proportion of patients presenting with moderate or severe regurgitation followed the same ranking order: Lotus (2.2%), Evolut PRO (5.3%), SAPIEN 3 (8.3%), Evolut R (8.8%), SAPIEN XT (10.9%), ACURATE (11.3%), and CoreValve (30.1%) (chi-square p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In this pooled analysis stemming from daily clinical practice, the Lotus valve was shown to have the best immediate sealing. This analysis re flects the objective evaluation of regurgitation by an academic core laboratory (nonsponsored) in a real -world cohort of patients using a quantitative technique.
- Multimodality imaging methods and systemic biomarkers in classical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis: Key findings for risk stratification(2023) LOPES, Maria Antonieta Albanez A. de M.; CAMPOS, Carlos M.; ROSA, Vitor Emer Egypto; SAMPAIO, Roney O.; MORAIS, Thamara C.; BRITO JUNIOR, Fabio Sandoli de; VIEIRA, Marcelo L. C.; JR, Wilson Mathias; FERNANDES, Joao Ricardo Cordeiro; SANTIS, Antonio de; SANTOS, Luciano de Moura; ROCHITTE, Carlos E.; CAPODANNO, Davide; TAMBURINO, Corrado; ABIZAID, Alexandre; TARASOUTCHI, FlavioObjectivesThe aim of the present study is to assess multimodality imaging findings according to systemic biomarkers, high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels, in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (LFLG-AS).BackgroundElevated levels of BNP and hsTnI have been related with poor prognosis in patients with LFLG-AS.MethodsProspective study with LFLG-AS patients that underwent hsTnI, BNP, coronary angiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with T1 mapping, echocardiogram and dobutamine stress echocardiogram. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to BNP and hsTnI levels: Group 1 (n = 17) when BNP and hsTnI levels were below median [BNP < 1.98 fold upper reference limit (URL) and hsTnI < 1.8 fold URL]; Group 2 (n = 14) when BNP or hsTnI were higher than median; and Group 3 (n = 18) when both hsTnI and BNP were higher than median.Results49 patients included in 3 groups. Clinical characteristics (including risk scores) were similar among groups. Group 3 patients had lower valvuloarterial impedance (P = 0.03) and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (P = 0.02) by echocardiogram. CMR identified a progressive increase of right and left ventricular chamber from Group 1 to Group 3, and worsening of left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (40 [31-47] vs. 32 [29-41] vs. 26 [19-33]%; p < 0.01) and right ventricular EF (62 [53-69] vs. 51 [35-63] vs. 30 [24-46]%; p < 0.01). Besides, there was a marked increase in myocardial fibrosis assessed by extracellular volume fraction (ECV) (28.4 [24.8-30.7] vs. 28.2 [26.9-34.5] vs. 31.8 [28.9-35.5]%; p = 0.03) and indexed ECV (iECV) (28.7 [21.2-39.1] vs. 28.8 [25.4-39.9] vs. 44.2 [36.4-51.2] ml/m(2), respectively; p < 0.01) from Group 1 to Group 3.ConclusionsHigher levels of BNP and hsTnI in LFLG-AS patients are associated with worse multi-modality evidence of cardiac remodeling and fibrosis.
- Papel da Avaliação Aortográfica Quantitativa da Regurgitação Aórtica por Videodensitometria na Orientação do Implante da Valva Aórtica(2018) MIYAZAKI, Yosuke; MODOLO, Rodrigo; ABDELGHANI, Mohammmad; TATEISHI, Hiroki; CAVALCANTE, Rafael; COLLET, Carlos; ASANO, Taku; KATAGIRI, Yuki; TENEKECIOGLU, Erhan; SARMENTO-LEITE, Rogerio; MANGIONE, Jose A.; ABIZAID, Alexandre; SOLIMAN, Osama I. I.; ONUMA, Yoshinobu; SERRUYS, Patrick W.; LEMOS, Pedro A.; JR, Fabio S. de BritoBackground: Balloon post-dilatation (BPD) is often needed for optimizing transcatheter heart valve (THV) implantation, since paravalvular leak (PVL) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation is associated with poor outcome and mortality. Quantitative assessment of PVL severity before and after BPD is mandatory to properly assess PVL, thus improving implantation results and outcomes. Objective: To investigate a quantitative angiographic assessment of aortic regurgitation (AR) by videodensitometry before and after BPD. Methods: Videodensitometric-AR assessments (VD-AR) before and after BPD were analysed in 61 cases. Results: VD-AR decreased significantly from 24.0[18.0-30.5]% to 12.0[5.5-19.0]% (p < 0.001, a two-tailed p < 0.05 defined the statistical significance).The relative delta of VD-AR after BPD ranged from -100% (improvement)to + 40% (deterioration) and its median value was -46.2%. The frequency of improvement, no change, and deterioration were 70% (n = 43), 25% (n = 15) and 5% (n = 3), respectively. Significant AR (VD-AR > 17%) was observed in 47 patients (77%) before and in 19 patients (31%) after BPD. Conclusions: VD-AR after THV implantation provides a quantitative assessment of post-TAVI regurgitation and can help in the decision-making process on performing BPD and in determining its efficacy.
- Sex Differences in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement(2019) VLASTRA, Wieneke; CHANDRASEKHAR, Jaya; BLANCO, Bruno Garcia Del; TCHETCHE, Didier; BRITO, Fabio S. de; BARBANTI, Marco; KORNOWSKI, Ran; LATIB, Azeem; D'ONOFRIO, Augusto; RIBICHINI, Flavio; BAAN, Jan; TIJSSEN, Jan G. P.; MORENO, Raul; DUMONTEIL, Nicolas; TARASOUTCHI, Flavio; SARTORI, Samantha; D'ERRIGO, Paola; TARANTINI, Giuseppe; LUNARDI, Mattia; ORVIN, Katia; PAGNESI, Matteo; BERENGUER, Alberto; MODINE, Thomas; DANGAS, George; MEHRAN, Roxana; PIEK, Jan J.; DELEWI, RonakBACKGROUND Transfemoral aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a guideline-recommended treatment option for patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. Women and men present with different baseline characteristics, which may influence procedural outcomes. OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate differences between women and men undergoing transfemoral TAVR across the globe during the last decade. METHODS The CENTER (Cerebrovascular EveNts in patients undergoing TranscathetER aortic valve implantation with balloon-expandable valves versus self-expandable valves)-collaboration was a global patient level dataset of patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR (N = 12,381) from 2007 to 2018. In this retrospective analysis, the study examined differences in baseline patient characteristics, 30-day stroke and mortality, and in-hospital outcomes between female and male patients. The study also assessed for temporal changes in outcomes and predictors for mortality per sex. RESULTS We included 58% (n = 7,120) female and 42% (n = 5,261) male patients. Women had higher prevalence of hypertension and glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.73 m(2) but lower prevalence of all other traditional cardiovascular comorbidities. Both sexes had similar rates of 30-day stroke (2.3% vs. 2.5%; p = 0.53) and mortality (5.9% vs. 5.5%; p = 0.17). In contrast, women had a 50% higher risk of life-threatening or major bleeding (6.7% vs. 4.4%; p < 0.01). Over the study period, mortality rates decreased to a greater extent in men than in women (60% vs. 50% reduction; both p < 0.001), with no reductions in stroke rates over time. CONCLUSIONS In this global collaboration, women and men had similar rates of 30-day mortality and stroke. However, women had higher rates of procedural life-threatening or major bleeding after TAVR. Between 2007 and 2018, mortality rates decreased to a greater extent in men than in women. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
- Incidence, Predictor, and Clinical Outcomes of Multiple Resheathing With Self-Expanding Valves During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement(2021) BERNARDI, Fernando L. M.; RODES-CABAU, Josep; TIRADO-CONTE, Gabriela; SANTOS, Ignacio J. Amat; PLACHTZIK, Claudia; CURA, Fernando; SZTEJFMAN, Matias; MANGIONE, Fernanda M.; TUMELEIRO, Rogerio; ESTEVES, Vinicius Borges Cardozo; MELO, Eduardo Franca Pessoa de; CHAUVET, Alejandro Alcocer; FUCHS, Felipe; SARMENTO-LEITE, Rogerio; MARTINS, Estevao Carvalho de Campos; NOMBELA-FRANCO, Luis; DELGADO-ARANA, Jose Raul; BOCKSCH, Wolfgang; LAMELAS, Pablo; GIULIANI, Carlos; CAMPANHA-BORGES, Diego Carter; MANGIONE, Jose A.; JR, Fabio Sandoli de Brito; ABIZAID, Alexandre C.; RIBEIRO, Henrique B.Background No study has evaluated the impact of the additional manipulation demanded by multiple resheathing (MR) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with repositionable self-expanding valves. Methods and Results This study included a real-world, multicenter registry involving 16 centers from Canada, Germany, Latin America, and Spain. All consecutive patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Evolut R, Evolut PRO, and Portico valves were included. Patients were divided according to the number of resheathing: no resheathing, single resheathing (SR), and MR. The primary end point was device success. Secondary outcomes included procedural complications, early safety events, and 1-year mortality. In 1026 patients, the proportion who required SR and MR was 23.9% and 9.3%, respectively. MR was predicted by the use of Portico and moderate/severe aortic regurgitation at baseline (both with P<0.01). Patients undergoing MR had less device success (no resheathing=89.9%, SR=89.8%, and MR=80%; P=0.01), driven by more need for a second prosthesis and device embolization. At 30 days, there were no differences in safety events. At 1 year, more deaths occurred with MR (no resheathing=10.5%, SR=8.0%, and MR=18.8%; P=0.014). After adjusting for baseline differences and center experience by annual volume, MR associated with less device success (odds ratio, 0.42; P=0.003) and increased 1-year mortality (hazard ratio, 2.06; P=0.01). When including only the Evolut R/PRO cases (N=837), MR continued to have less device success (P<0.001) and a trend toward increased mortality (P=0.05). Conclusions Repositioning a self-expanding valve is used in a third of patients, being multiple in approximate to 10%. MR, but not SR, was associated with more device failure and higher 1-year mortality, regardless of the type of valve implanted.