Coronary atherosclerotic burden assessed by SYNTAX scores and outcomes in surgical, percutaneous or medical strategies: a retrospective cohort study

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2022
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
Citação
BMJ OPEN, v.12, n.9, article ID e062378, 9p, 2022
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Introduction Coronary atherosclerotic burden and SYNTAX Score (SS) are predictors of cardiovascular events. Objectives To investigate the value of SYNTAX scores (SS, SYNTAX Score II (SSII) and residual SYNTAX Score (rSS)) for predicting cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Single tertiary centre. Participants Medicine, Angioplasty or Surgery Study database patients with stable multivessel CAD and preserved ejection fraction. Interventions Patients with CAD undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or medical treatment (MT) alone from January 2002 to December 2015. Primary and secondary outcomes Primary: 5-year allcause mortality. Secondary: composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke and subsequent coronary revascularisation at 5 years. Results A total of 1719 patients underwent PCI (n=573), CABG (n=572) or MT (n=574) alone. The SS was not considered an independent predictor of 5-year mortality in the PCI (low, intermediate and high SS at 6.5%, 6.8% and 4.3%, respectively, p=0.745), CABG (low, intermediate and high SS at 5.7%, 8.0% and 12.1%, respectively, p=0.194) and MT (low, intermediate and high SS at 6.8%, 6.9% and 6.5%, respectively, p=0.993) cohorts. The SSII (low, intermediate and high SSII at 3.6% vs 7.9% vs 10.5%, respectively, p<0.001) was associated with a higher mortality risk in the overall population. Within each treatment strategy, SSII was associated with a significant 5-year mortality rate, especially in CABG patients with higher SSII (low, intermediate and high SSII at 1.8%, 9.7% and 10.0%, respectively, p=0.004) and in MT patients with high SSII (low, intermediate and high SSII at 5.0%, 4.7% and 10.8%, respectively, p=0.031). SSII demonstrated a better predictive accuracy for mortality compared with SS and rSS (c-index=0.62). Conclusions Coronary atherosclerotic burden alone was not associated with significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality. The SSII better discriminates the risk of death.
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. Bari D Study Grp, 2009, NEW ENGL J MED, V360, P2503, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa0805796
  2. Boden WE, 2007, NEW ENGL J MED, V356, P1503, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa070829
  3. Campos CM, 2015, EUR HEART J, V36, P1231, DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu518
  4. Campos CM, 2014, CIRC J, V78, P1942, DOI 10.1253/circj.CJ-14-0204
  5. Cavalcante R, 2017, EUR HEART J, V38, P1969, DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx138
  6. Farooq V, 2013, CIRCULATION, V128, P141, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001803
  7. Farooq V, 2013, LANCET, V381, P639, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60108-7
  8. Garzillo CL, 2019, JAMA INTERN MED, V179, P1345, DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2227
  9. Genereux P, 2012, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V59, P2165, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.010
  10. KLEIN LW, 1986, AM J CARDIOL, V58, P42, DOI 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90238-9
  11. Kobayashi Y, 2016, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V67, P1701, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.056
  12. Kurtul BE, 2021, DIABETES RES CLIN PR, V177, DOI 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108875
  13. MARK DB, 1994, CIRCULATION, V89, P2015, DOI 10.1161/01.CIR.89.5.2015
  14. Maron DJ, 2020, NEW ENGL J MED, V382, P1395, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1915922
  15. Melina G, 2017, EUR J CARDIO-THORAC, V51, P547, DOI 10.1093/ejcts/ezw356
  16. Reynolds HR, 2021, CIRCULATION, V144, P1024, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.049755
  17. Serruys PW, 2009, EUROINTERVENTION, V5, P50, DOI 10.4244/EIJV5I1A9
  18. Sianos Georgios, 2005, EuroIntervention, V1, P219
  19. Sotomi Y, 2016, JACC-CARDIOVASC INTE, V9, P1564, DOI 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.023
  20. Tam DY, 2020, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V76, P1153, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.052