Internal consistency of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in Amazonian children

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA
Autores
GIACOMINI, Isabel
MARTINS, Maria Rosario O.
CARDOSO, Marly A.
Citação
REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, v.57, suppl.2, article ID 4s, 12p, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency of behavioral problems and the internal consistency of the parent version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-P) in Amazonian preschool children during the covid-19 pandemic. METHODS: Data from the Maternal and Child Health and Nutrition in Acre (MINA-Brazil) study, a population -base d birth cohort in the Western Brazilian Amazon, were used. The SDQ-P was applied in 2021 at the five -year follow-up visit to parents or caregivers of 695 children (49.4% of which were girls). This instrument is a short behavioral screening questionnaire composed of 25 items reorganized into five subscales: emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity/inattention, peer relationship problems, and prosocial behavior. Cases of behavioral problems were defined according to the original SDQ cut-offs based on United Kingdom norms. Moreover, cut off points were estimated based on the SDQ-P percentile results of our study sample. Internal consistency was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha coefficient and McDonald's omega for each scale. RESULTS: According to the cut-offs based on our studied population distribution, 10% of all children had high or very high total difficulty scores, whereas it was almost twice when the original SDQ cut-offs based on United Kingdom norms, were applied (18%). Differences were also observed in the other scales. Compared to girls, boys showed higher means of externalizing problem and lower means of prosocial behavior. The five -factor model showed a moderate internal consistency of the items for all scales (0.60 <= alpha <= 0.40), except for total difficulty scores, which it considered substantial (alpha > 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the usefulness of SDQ in our study population and reinforce the need for strategies and policy development for mental health care in early life in the Amazon. DESCRIPTORS: Psychometrics. Problem Behavior, Child Behavior Disorders. Behavior Rating Scale.
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. Bauer A, 2022, EUR CHILD ADOLES PSY, V31, P1193, DOI 10.1007/s00787-021-01759-w
  2. Cardoso MA, 2020, BMJ OPEN, V10, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034513
  3. Cusinato M, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17228297
  4. de Araújo LA, 2021, J PEDIAT-BRAZIL, V97, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.jped.2020.08.008
  5. de Onis M, 2007, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V85, P660, DOI 10.2471/BLT.07.043497
  6. de Vet HCW, 2017, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V85, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.01.013
  7. de Vries PJ, 2018, EPIDEMIOL PSYCH SCI, V27, P369, DOI 10.1017/S2045796016001207
  8. Deng LF, 2017, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V77, P185, DOI 10.1177/0013164416658325
  9. Dumcke TS, 2020, J PEDIAT-BRAZIL, V96, P364, DOI 10.1016/j.jped.2018.11.014
  10. Azevêdo PVBE, 2020, EUR CHILD ADOLES PSY, V29, P373, DOI 10.1007/s00787-019-01356-y
  11. Fatori D, 2018, CIENC SAUDE COLETIVA, V23, P3013, DOI 10.1590/1413-81232018239.25332016
  12. Ferreira MU, 2022, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010580
  13. Fleitlich B.W., 2000, INFANTO REV NEUROPSI, V8, P44
  14. Fleitlich-Bilyk B, 2004, J AM ACAD CHILD PSY, V43, P727, DOI 10.1097/01.chi.0000120021.14101.ca
  15. Gil JDC, 2020, J GLOB HEALTH, V10, DOI 10.7189/jogh.10.010427
  16. Goodman A, 2012, SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID, V47, P1321, DOI 10.1007/s00127-011-0440-2
  17. Goodman A, 2010, J ABNORM CHILD PSYCH, V38, P1179, DOI 10.1007/s10802-010-9434-x
  18. Goodman R, 1997, J CHILD PSYCHOL PSYC, V38, P581, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x
  19. Grasso M, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19137731
  20. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica, Cidades e Estados: Cruzeiro do Sul
  21. Kersten P, 2016, INT J BEHAV DEV, V40, P64, DOI 10.1177/0165025415570647
  22. Li SP, 2021, PUBLIC HEALTH NUTR, V24, P1869, DOI 10.1017/S1368980020003237
  23. Malik TA, 2019, J PAEDIATR CHILD H, V55, P1414, DOI 10.1111/jpc.14429
  24. Neves JA, 2022, GLOB PUBLIC HEALTH, V17, P26, DOI 10.1080/17441692.2020.1850828
  25. SDQINFO, 2022, Youth in mind: Scoring the SDQ
  26. Stone LL, 2013, EUR J PSYCHOL ASSESS, V29, P44, DOI 10.1027/1015-5759/a000119
  27. United Nations Development Programme, 2022, Atlas do desenvolvimento humano dos municipios
  28. Vasileva M, 2021, J CHILD PSYCHOL PSYC, V62, P372, DOI 10.1111/jcpp.13261
  29. WHO, 1995, World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser, V854, P1
  30. Woerner W, 2004, EUR CHILD ADOLES PSY, V13, P47, DOI 10.1007/s00787-004-2008-0