Impact of an Educational Intervention Implanted in a Neurological Intensive Care Unit on Rates of Infection Related to External Ventricular Drains

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
37
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2013
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
Citação
PLOS ONE, v.8, n.2, article ID e50708, 7p, 2013
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background: Studies on the implantation of care routines showed reduction on EVD catheter-related infections rates; however zero tolerance is difficult to be achieved. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of an educational intervention on the maximal reduction on rates of EVD-related infections. Methodology/Principal Findings: The quasi-experimental (before-after intervention) study occurred in two phases: pre-intervention, from April 2007 to July 2008, and intervention, from August 2008 to July 2010. Patients were followed for 30 days after the removal of the EVD, and EVD-related infections were considered as only those with laboratorial confirmation in the CSF. Observations were made of the care of the EVD and compliance with Hygiene of the Hands (HH), a routine of care was drawn up, training was given, and intervention was made to reduce the time the EVD catheter remained in place. Results: during the study, 178 patients were submitted to 194 procedures, corresponding to 1217 EVD catheters-day. Gram-negative agents were identified in 71.4% of the infections during the pre-intervention period and in 60% during the intervention period. During the study, EVD-related infection rates were reduced from 9.5% to 4.8% per patient, from 8.8% to 4.4% per procedure, and the incidence density dropped from 14.0 to 6.9 infections per 1000 catheters-day (p = 0.027). The mortality reduced 12% (from 42% to 30%). Conclusions/Significance: During one year after the fourth intervention, no microbiologically identified infection was documented. In light of these results, educational intervention proved to be a useful tool in reducing these rates and showed also impact on mortality.
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. Arabi Y, 2005, AM J INFECT CONTROL, V33, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.11.008
  2. BOGDAHN U, 1992, NEUROSURGERY, V31, P898
  3. Bota DP, 2005, J NEUROSURG, V103, P468, DOI 10.3171/jns.2005.103.3.0468
  4. Chi H, 2010, INT J INFECT DIS, V14, P216
  5. Dasic D, 2006, BRIT J NEUROSURG, V20, P296, DOI 10.1080/02688690600999901
  6. Girao E, 2008, INT J INFECT, V12, P145
  7. Hoefnagel D, 2008, ACTA NEUROCHIR, V150, P209, DOI 10.1007/s00701-007-1458-9
  8. Holloway KL, 1996, J NEUROSURG, V85, P419, DOI 10.3171/jns.1996.85.3.0419
  9. Honda H, 2010, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V31, P1078, DOI 10.1086/656377
  10. Horan TC, 2008, AM J INFECT CONTROL, V36, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002
  11. Korinek AM, 2005, ACTA NEUROCHIR, V147, P39, DOI 10.1007/s00701-004-0416-z
  12. Krol V, 2009, J Hosp Infect, V71, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.jhin.2008.09.018
  13. Leverstein-van Hall MA, 2010, J NEUROSURG, V112, P345, DOI 10.3171/2009.6.JNS09223
  14. Levin AS, 1999, CLIN INFECT DIS, V28, P1008, DOI 10.1086/514732
  15. Lietard C, 2008, J NEUROSURG, V109, P729, DOI 10.3171/JNS/2008/109/10/0729
  16. Lobo RD, 2005, AM J INFECT CONTROL, V33, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.05.003
  17. Lobo RD, 2010, AM J INFECT CONTROL, V38, P440, DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.09.013
  18. Maniker AH, 2006, NEUROSURGERY, V59, P419, DOI 10.1227/01.NEU.0000222817.99752.E6
  19. MAYHALL CG, 1984, NEW ENGL J MED, V310, P553, DOI 10.1056/NEJM198403013100903
  20. Park P, 2004, NEUROSURGERY, V55, P594, DOI 10.1227/01.NEU.0000134289.04500.EE
  21. Pfisterer W, 2003, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V74, P929, DOI 10.1136/jnnp.74.7.929
  22. Pronovost P, 2006, NEW ENGL J MED, V355, P2725, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa061115
  23. Rebuck JA, 2000, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V69, P381, DOI 10.1136/jnnp.69.3.381
  24. Schade RP, 2005, J NEUROSURG, V102, P229, DOI 10.3171/jns.2005.102.2.0229
  25. [Anonymous], 2006, M100S16 CLSI