Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP-
dc.contributor.authorRIBEIRO, Marizelia Rodrigues Costa-
dc.contributor.authorSILVA, Antonio Augusto Moura da-
dc.contributor.authorALVES, Maria Teresa Seabra Soares de Britto e-
dc.contributor.authorBATISTA, Rosangela Fernandes Lucena-
dc.contributor.authorRIBEIRO, Cecilia Claudia Costa-
dc.contributor.authorSCHRAIBER, Lilia Blima-
dc.contributor.authorBETTIOL, Heloisa-
dc.contributor.authorBARBIERI, Marco Antonio-
dc.identifier.citationPLOS ONE, v.12, n.1, article ID e0170469, 16p, 2017-
dc.description.abstractFew studies have used structural equation modeling to analyze the effects of variables on violence against women. The present study analyzed the effects of socioeconomic status and social support on violence against pregnant women who used prenatal services. This was a cross-sectional study based on data from the Brazilian Ribeirao Preto and Sao Luis birth cohort studies (BRISA). The sample of the municipality of Sao Luis (Maranhao/Brazil) consisted of 1,446 pregnant women interviewed in 2010 and 2011. In the proposed model, socioeconomic status was the most distal predictor, followed by social support that determined general violence, psychological violence or physical/sexual violence, which were analyzed as latent variables. Violence was measured by the World Health Organization Violence against Women (WHO VAW) instrument. The Sao Luis model was estimated using structural equation modeling and validated with 1,378 pregnant women from Ribeirao Preto (Sao Paulo/Brazil). The proposed model showed good fit for general, psychological and physical/sexual violence for the Sao Luis sample. Socioeconomic status had no effect on general or psychological violence (p>0.05), but pregnant women with lower socioeconomic status reported more episodes of physical/sexual violence (standardized coefficient, SC = -0.136; p = 0.021). This effect of socioeconomic status was indirect and mediated by low social support (SC = -0.075; p<0.001). Low social support was associated with more episodes of general, psychological and physical/sexual violence (p<0.001). General and psychological violence indistinctly affected pregnant women of different socioeconomic status. Physical/sexual violence was more common for pregnant women with lower socioeconomic status and lower social support. Better social support contributed to reduction of all types of violence. Results were nearly the same for the validation sample of Ribeirao Preto except that SES was not associated with physical/sexual violence.-
dc.description.sponsorshipHealth Ministry-
dc.description.sponsorshipCNPq (National Research Council)-
dc.description.sponsorshipFAPESP (Sao Paulo State Research Foundation)-
dc.description.sponsorshipFAPEMA (Maranhao State Research Foundation)-
dc.relation.ispartofPlos One-
dc.subject.otherintimate partner violence-
dc.subject.othergender-based violence-
dc.titleEffects of Socioeconomic Status and Social Support on Violence against Pregnant Women: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis-
dc.rights.holderCopyright PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE-
dc.subject.wosMultidisciplinary Sciences-
dc.type.categoryoriginal article-
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion-, Marizelia Rodrigues Costa:Univ Fed Maranhao, Dept Med 3, Sao Luis, Maranhao, Brazil-, Antonio Augusto Moura da:Univ Fed Maranhao, Dept Publ Hlth, Sao Luis, Maranhao, Brazil-, Maria Teresa Seabra Soares de Britto e:Univ Fed Maranhao, Dept Publ Hlth, Sao Luis, Maranhao, Brazil-, Rosangela Fernandes Lucena:Univ Fed Maranhao, Dept Publ Hlth, Sao Luis, Maranhao, Brazil-, Cecilia Claudia Costa:Univ Fed Maranhao, Dept Odontol, Sao Luis, Maranhao, Brazil-, Heloisa:Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med Ribeirao Preto, Dept Pediat, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil-, Marco Antonio:Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med Ribeirao Preto, Dept Pediat, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil-
hcfmusp.publisher.citySAN FRANCISCO-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAbramsky T, 2011, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V11, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-109-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAmerican Psychological Association, 2007, REP APA TASK FORC SO-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAudi Celene Aparecida Ferrari, 2008, Rev. Saúde Pública, V42, P877, DOI [10.1590/S0034-89102008005000041, 10.1590/s0034-89102008000500013]-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBessa MMM, 2014, REPROD CLIM, V29, P71-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBharmal N, 2015, UNDERSTANDING UPSTRE-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBrown T. A., 2015, CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceByrne B. M., 2012, STRUCTURAL EQUATION-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCampbell J, 2004, VIOLENCE AGAINST WOM, V10, P770, DOI 10.1177/1077201204265551-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRibeiro MRC, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0115382-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRibeiro MRC, 2014, BMC PREGNANCY CHILDB, V14, DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-14-66-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDebono C, 2016, J CLIN NURS-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDurand Julia Garcia, 2007, Rev. bras. epidemiol., V10, P310, DOI 10.1590/S1415-790X2007000300003-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFarid M, 2008, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V101, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.11.015-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGriep Rosane Harter, 2005, Cad. Saúde Pública, V21, P703, DOI 10.1590/S0102-311X2005000300004-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceJasinski JL, 2004, TRAUMA VIOLENCE ABUS, V1, P47-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKishor S, 2004, PROFILING DOMESTIC V-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKiss L, 2012, SOC SCI MED, V74, P1172, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.033-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKline R. B., 2016, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMoraes CL, 2002, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V79, P269, DOI 10.1016/S0020-7292(02)00250-3-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNasir K, 2003, EUR J PUBLIC HEALTH, V13, P105, DOI 10.1093/eurpub/13.2.105-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNational Center for Education Statistics, 2012, IMPR MEAS SOC STAT N-
hcfmusp.relation.referenced'Oliveira AFPL, 2009, REV SAUDE PUBL, V43, P299, DOI [10.1590/S0034-89102009005000013, 10.1590/s0034-89102009005000013]-
hcfmusp.relation.reference[Anonymous], 2013, BAS DAD ATL DES HUM-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRaffo JE, 2010, PUBLIC HEALTH NURS, V27, P385, DOI 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2010.00871.x-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRenzetti CM, 2011, EC STRESS DOMESTIC V-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSchraiber LB, 2010, REV SAUDE PUBL, V44, P658, DOI 10.1590/S0034-89102010000400009-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSchraiber LB, 2009, CAD SAUDE PUBLICA, V25, pS205-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceShamu S, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0017591-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSHERBOURNE CD, 1991, SOC SCI MED, V32, P705, DOI 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90150-B-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceTaillieu TL, 2010, AGGRESS VIOLENT BEH, V15, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.avb.2009.07.013-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceTrotter JL, 2004, J EMOTIONAL ABUSE, V4, P53, DOI 10.1300/J135v04n02_03-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWang J., 2012, STRUCTURAL EQUATION-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWorld Health Organization, 2005, EST MULT SAUD MULH V-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWorld Health Organization, 2005, WHO MULT STUD WOM HL-
hcfmusp.relation.reference[Anonymous], 2005, SOCIAL SUPPORT MEASU-
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MPR
Departamento de Medicina Preventiva - FM/MPR

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/39
LIM/39 - Laboratório de Processamento de Dados Biomédicos

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - ODS/05
ODS/05 - Igualdade de gênero

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - ODS/16
ODS/16 - Paz, justiça e instituições eficazes

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art_RIBEIRO_Effects_of_Socioeconomic_Status_and_Social_Support_on_2017.PDFpublishedVersion (English)1.65 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.