Anomalous origin of the coronary artery arising from the opposite sinus: prevalence and outcomes in patients undergoing coronary CTA

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
74
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2017
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
Autores
CHEEZUM, Michael K.
GHOSHHAJRA, Brian
HULTEN, Edward A.
BHATT, Ami
MOUSAVI, Negareh
SHAH, Nishant R.
VALENTE, Anne Marie
RYBICKI, Frank J.
STEIGNER, Michael
Citação
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, v.18, n.2, p.224-235, 2017
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Aims The impact of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) on management of anomalous origin of the coronary artery arising from the opposite sinus (ACAOS) remains uncertain. We examined the prevalence, anatomical characterization, and outcomes of ACAOS patients undergoing CTA. Methods and results Among 5991 patients referred for CTA at two tertiary hospitals between January 2004 and June 2014, we identified 103 patients (1.7% prevalence) with 110 ACAOS vessels. Mean age was 52 years (range 5-83, 63% male), with 55% previously known ACAOS and 45% discovered on CTA. ACAOS subtypes included: 39% interarterial (n = 40 anomalous right coronary artery, n = 3 anomalous left coronary artery), 38% retroaortic, 15% subpulmonic, 5% prepulmonic, and 2% other. ACAOS patients were assessed for symptoms, ischaemic test results, revascularization, all-cause or cardiovascular (CV) death, and myocardial infarction. CTAs were reviewed for ACAOS course, take-off height and angle, length and severity of proximal narrowing, intramural course, and obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). In follow-up (median 5.8 years), there were 20 surgical revascularizations and 3 CV deaths. After adjusting for obstructive CAD (n = 21/103, 20%), variables associated with ACAOS revascularization included the following: CV symptoms, proximal vessel narrowing >= 50%, length of narrowing.5.4 mm, and an interarterial course. Conclusion The prevalence of ACAOS on CTA was 1.7%, including 45% of cases discovered incidentally. CTA provided excellent characterization of ACAOS features associated with coronary revascularization, including the length and severity of proximal vessel narrowing.
Palavras-chave
anomalous coronary artery, coronary computed tomographic angiography, prognosis, revascularization, sudden cardiac death
Referências
  1. Abbara Suhny, 2009, J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, V3, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.jcct.2009.03.004
  2. Angelini P, 2007, CIRCULATION, V115, P1296, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.618082
  3. Ashrafpoor G, 2015, EUR RADIOL, V25, P760, DOI 10.1007/s00330-014-3454-9
  4. Barriales-Villa R, 2006, REV ESP CARDIOL, V59, P620, DOI 10.1157/13089750
  5. Basso C, 2000, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V35, P1493, DOI 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00566-0
  6. Bittencourt MS, 2014, CIRC-CARDIOVASC IMAG, V7, P282, DOI 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.001047
  7. Brothers JA, 2007, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V50, P2078, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.055
  8. CHEITLIN MD, 1974, CIRCULATION, V50, P780
  9. Christman MP, 2014, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V63, P1264, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.052
  10. Cutlip DE, 2007, CIRCULATION, V115, P2344, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.685313
  11. Dodd JD, 2007, AM J ROENTGENOL, V188, pW138, DOI 10.2214/AJR.05.2098
  12. Eckart RE, 2004, ANN INTERN MED, V141, P829
  13. Erez E, 2006, ANN THORAC SURG, V82, P973, DOI 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.04.089
  14. Gibbons RJ, 2002, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V40, P1531, DOI 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02164-2
  15. Graham TP, 2005, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V45, P1326, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.009
  16. Hansen Christopher L, 2006, J Nucl Cardiol, V13, pe97, DOI 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.08.008
  17. Harris PA, 2009, J BIOMED INFORM, V42, P377, DOI 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
  18. Hundley WG, 2009, J CARDIOVASC MAGN R, V11, DOI 10.1186/1532-429X-11-5
  19. Kaushal S, 2011, ANN THORAC SURG, V92, P986, DOI 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.04.112
  20. Krupinski M, 2014, EUR RADIOL, V24, P2353, DOI 10.1007/s00330-014-3238-2
  21. Lang RM, 2005, J AM SOC ECHOCARDIOG, V18, P1440, DOI 10.1016/j.echo.2005.10.005
  22. Lee HJ, 2012, RADIOLOGY, V262, P101, DOI 10.1148/radiol.11110823
  23. Machac Josef, 2006, J Nucl Cardiol, V13, pe121, DOI 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.08.009
  24. Mainwaring RD, 2014, EUR J CARDIO-THORAC, V46, P20, DOI 10.1093/ejcts/ezt614
  25. Mainwaring RD, 2011, ANN THORAC SURG, V92, P691, DOI 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.03.127
  26. Maron BJ, 2005, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V45, P1340, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.011
  27. Miller JA, 2012, INT J CARDIOVAS IMAG, V28, P1525, DOI 10.1007/s10554-011-9936-9
  28. Mirchandani S, 2005, INT J CARDIOL, V102, P383, DOI 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.10.010
  29. Montagnana M, 2008, INTERNAL MED, V47, P1373, DOI 10.2169/internalmedicine.47.1242
  30. Nasis A, 2015, INT J CARDIOVAS IMAG, V31, P181, DOI 10.1007/s10554-014-0535-4
  31. Opolski MP, 2013, AM J CARDIOL, V111, P1361, DOI 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.01.280
  32. Poynter Jeffrey A, 2014, World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg, V5, P507, DOI 10.1177/2150135114540182
  33. Romp RL, 2003, ANN THORAC SURG, V76, P589, DOI 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)00436-3
  34. Sharma V, 2014, ANN THORAC SURG, V98, P941, DOI 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.04.114
  35. TAYLOR AJ, 1992, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V20, P640
  36. Taylor AJ, 2010, J CARDIOVASC COMPUT, V4, pe1
  37. Thygesen K, 2012, CIRCULATION, V126, P2020, DOI 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31826e1058
  38. Turner Immanuel I, 2011, World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg, V2, P340, DOI 10.1177/2150135111406938
  39. VIRMANI R, 1984, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V3, P766
  40. Warnes Carole A, 2008, J Am Coll Cardiol, V52, pe143, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.10.001