Delphi Study Consensus Recommendations: Patient Selection and Preoperative Planning Measurements for Natrelle 410
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
16
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2015
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Autores
HEDEN, Per
BROWN, Mitchell H.
LUAN, Jie
MAXWELL, G. Patrick
CARTER, Mollie
Citação
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, v.3, n.11, 2015
Resumo
Background: There is considerable variation in the planning and implementation process for breast augmentation. Although general guidelines are available, the distinctive characteristics of the Natrelle 410 breast implant warrant surgical guidelines specific to this device. This study aimed to develop consensus recommendations for patient selection and preoperative planning for Natrelle 410 in primary breast augmentation. Methods: Surgeons were invited to participate in this study, which used a modified Delphi method. Participants completed 2 rounds of online surveys, with the second round (Recommendations Survey) based on responses from the first round. Respondents also listed their top priorities for using Natrelle 410 implants. Results: Participants (n = 22) reached consensus on 15 of 18 criteria for patient selection; tuberous breasts, patient preference regarding upper pole shape, and asymmetry of the breasts were the top 3 patient characteristics considered appropriate for the use of Natrelle 410. Consensus was reached on 38 of 51 items related to preoperative planning, with 8 measurements and 6 markings recommended by the participants. Patient-desired outcome was considered the most essential element for Natrelle 410 implant selection; quality of skin envelope and height and width dimension of the breast were selected as the most essential elements for Natrelle 410 implant volume selection. Conclusions: The modified Delphi method resulted in consensus recommendations for patient selection and preoperative planning in primary breast augmentation with the Natrelle 410 breast implant. These recommendations and priorities, used in concert with a surgeon's clinical experience, are designed to optimize surgical outcomes.
Palavras-chave
Referências
- Adams WP, 2012, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V130, p598E, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318262f607
- Adams Jr WP, 2011, BREAST AUGMENTATION, P12
- BARONE FE, 1992, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V90, P77, DOI 10.1097/00006534-199207000-00012
- Bengtson BP, 2007, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V120, p40S, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000286666.29101.11
- Berry MG, 2011, J PLAST RECONSTR AES, V64, P1401, DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2011.03.028
- DALKEY N, 1963, MANAGE SCI, V9, P458, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458
- Diamond IR, 2014, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V67, P401, DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002
- Donfrancesco A, 2013, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V132, P810, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a014cb
- Heden P, 2001, CLIN PLAST SURG, V28, P531
- Heden P., 2011, SURG BREAST PRINCIPL, P1322
- Hidalgo DA, 2014, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V133, p567E, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000033
- Hsu CC, 2007, RES EVALUAT, V12, P1
- International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, ISAPS INT SURV AESTH
- Jacobson JM, 2012, AESTHET SURG J, V32, P456, DOI 10.1177/1090820X12444267
- Maxwell GP, 2012, AESTHET SURG J, V32, P709, DOI 10.1177/1090820X12452423
- Munhoz AM, 2006, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V30, P503, DOI 10.1007/s00266-006-0017-8
- Namnoum JD, 2013, J PLAST RECONSTR AES, V66, P1165, DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.04.046
- Stevens WG, 2013, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V132, P1115, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000435317.76381.68
- Tebbetts JB, 2005, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V116, P2005, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000191163.19379.63
- Tebbetts JB, 2002, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V109, P1396, DOI 10.1097/00006534-200204010-00030
- [Anonymous], 2009, NATR SIL FILL BREAST