Categorization Working Memory Span Task: Validation study of two Brazilian alternate versions

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_BRUM_Categorization_Working_Memory_Span_Task_Validation_study_of_2018.PDF (466.96 KB)
Citações na Scopus
2
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2018
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
WILEY
Autores
BORELLA, Erika
CARRETTI, Barbara
GUIDOTTI, Elena
Citação
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, v.33, n.4, p.652-657, 2018
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
BackgroundThe Categorization Working Memory Span Task (CWMS task) is a complex working memory (WM) span test that has been used previously to assess age and individual differences in WM as well as the relationship between WM and complex aspects of cognition such as listening comprehension. Two alternate versions of the task have been developed to be used as outcome variables in WM training protocol, which mirrors the task involved in the CWMS task. Objectives(1) To translate and adapt the CWMS task for Brazilian Portuguese; (2) to test the equivalence of its 2 alternate versions; (3) to examine temporal stability; (4) to examine the influence of age and schooling on CWMS task; (5) to establish its relationship with other tests of WM. MethodsEighty-one older adults completed version A, and 86 completed version B of the CWMS task. After 6months, a subsample (n=85) completed the same version of the task. ResultsVersions A and B of the task generated comparable scores. Both versions had adequate temporal stability, which was higher for the CWMS total recall, which is the classical variable in this task to represent WM performance, when compared to the other variables generated by the test. The CWMS task variables were moderately correlated with schooling and other cognitive tests (Mini Mental State Examination, Letter-Number Sequencing, Spatial Span Backward, Digit Span Forward). ConclusionsThe 2 versions of the CWMS task were equivalent and stable temporally. The task was influenced by schooling and global cognition.
Palavras-chave
aging, cognitive testing, older adults, validation, working memory
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/26576
Referências
  1. Avila RT, 2015, J INT NEUROPSYCH SOC, V21, P392, DOI 10.1017/S135561771500034X
  2. BADDELEY A, 1985, J MEM LANG, V24, P119, DOI 10.1016/0749-596X(85)90019-1
  3. Baddeley AD, 1974, PSYCHOL MEMORY, VII, P134
  4. BERTOLUCCI PHF, 1994, ARQ NEURO-PSIQUIAT, V52, P1, DOI 10.1590/S0004-282X1994000100001
  5. Bertolucci PHF, 2001, ARQ NEURO-PSIQUIAT, V59, P532, DOI 10.1590/S0004-282X2001000400009
  6. Bisiacchi PS, 2008, J CLIN EXP NEUROPSYC, V30, P723, DOI 10.1080/13803390701689587
  7. Borella E, 2010, J LEARN DISABIL 0706
  8. Borella E, 2008, ACTA PSYCHOL, V128, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.09.008
  9. Borella E, 2007, AGING CLIN EXP RES, V19, P200, DOI 10.1007/BF03324690
  10. Borella E, 2014, DEV PSYCHOL, V50, P714, DOI 10.1037/a0034293
  11. Borella E, 2013, ARCH CLIN NEUROPSYCH, V28, P331, DOI 10.1093/arclin/act020
  12. Borella E, 2009, EUR J COGN PSYCHOL, V21, P445, DOI 10.1080/09541440802613997
  13. Brucki SMD, 2003, ARQ NEURO-PSIQUIAT, V61, P777, DOI 10.1590/S0004-282X2003000500014
  14. Cantarella A, 2017, INT J GERIATR PSYCH, V32, P86, DOI 10.1002/gps.4448
  15. Carretti B, 2005, J EXP CHILD PSYCHOL, V91, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.01.005
  16. CARRETTI B, 2010, RICERCHE PSICOLOGIA, V3, P361
  17. Carretti B, 2007, EXP PSYCHOL, V54, P311, DOI 10.1027/1618-3169.54.4.311
  18. Carretti B, 2014, BRIT J EDUC PSYCHOL, V84, P194, DOI 10.1111/bjep.12022
  19. Carretti B, 2013, INT J GERIATR PSYCH, V28, P539, DOI 10.1002/gps.3859
  20. Carretti B, 2012, J COGN PSYCHOL, V24, P243, DOI 10.1080/20445911.2011.603695
  21. Cohen J, 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
  22. DANEMAN M, 1980, J VERB LEARN VERB BE, V19, P450, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6
  23. De Beni R, 1998, Q J EXP PSYCHOL-A, V51, P305, DOI 10.1080/713755761
  24. De Beni R, 2007, AGING NEUROPSYCHOL C, V14, P189, DOI 10.1080/13825580500229213
  25. Elkana O, 2015, J ALZHEIMERS DIS, P1
  26. Fleiss J., 1981, STAT METHODS RATES P
  27. HASHER L, 1991, J EXP PSYCHOL LEARN, V17, P163, DOI 10.1037//0278-7393.17.1.163
  28. Kessels RPC, 2011, AGING CLIN EXP RES, V23, P487
  29. Kessels Roy P.C., 2015, Dement. neuropsychol., V9, P301, DOI 10.1590/1980-57642015DN93000014
  30. Lamberty G J, 1995, Appl Neuropsychol, V2, P170, DOI 10.1207/s15324826an0203&4_12
  31. Massena PN, 2015, INT PSYCHOGERIATR, V27, P1113, DOI 10.1017/S1041610214001021
  32. Nascimento E, 2004, ADAPTACAO VALIDACAO, P161
  33. Ouwehand K, 2016, MEMORY, V24, P1243, DOI 10.1080/09658211.2015.1094492
  34. Pachana NA, 2007, INT PSYCHOGERIATR, V19, P103, DOI 10.1017/S1041610206003504
  35. Paradela EMP, 2005, REV SAUDE PUBL, V39, P918, DOI 10.1590/s0034-89102005000600008
  36. PFEFFER RI, 1982, J GERONTOL, V37, P323, DOI 10.1093/geronj/37.3.323
  37. Sanchez Maria Angélica dos Santos, 2011, Dement. neuropsychol., V5, P322, DOI 10.1590/S1980-57642011DN05040010
  38. Shipstead Z, 2012, PSYCHOL BULL, V138, P628, DOI 10.1037/a0027473
  39. van Geldorp B, 2015, J CLIN EXP NEUROPSYC, V37, P538, DOI 10.1080/13803395.2015.1037722
  40. Wechsler D., 1997, WECHSLER ADULT INTEL
  41. Wiechmann A, 2010, AGING NEUROPSYCHOL C, V18, P56, DOI 10.1080/13825585.2010.510556
  42. Wilde NJ, 2004, J CLIN EXP NEUROPSYC, V26, P539, DOI 10.1080/13803390490496605
  43. YESAVAGE JA, 1983, J PSYCHIAT RES, V17, P37, DOI 10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/45