PM10 Exposure and Cardiorespiratory Mortality - Estimating the Effects and Economic Losses in Sao Paulo, Brazil

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
12
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2018
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
TAIWAN ASSOC AEROSOL RES-TAAR
Autores
ABE, Karina Camasmie
SANTOS, Gianni Mara Silva dos
MIRAGLIA, Simone Georges El Khouri
Citação
AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, v.18, n.12, p.3127-3133, 2018
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Air pollution is an important health risk concern and an economic burden, notably on low- and middle-income countries. The aim of this study was to determine the mortality burden of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, specifically, the relative risk due to air pollution and the economic valuation derived from life-years lost within the population of Sao Paulo, Brazil. This study was conducted using a retrospective Health Impact Assessment (HIA) approach via daily time series of cardiovascular and respiratory deaths for the population of Sao Paulo from 2000 to 2011. The effects of particulate matter smaller than 10 mu m (PM10) were estimated with Poisson generalized additive models. The single-day lag effects of air pollutant exposure were estimated for 0-3-day lags. Therefore, we obtained the years of life lost (YLL) through the disability-adjusted life years (DALY) method to estimate the burden of disease due to air pollution in Sao Paulo. The value of a life year (VOLY) was then applied to convert the YLL component to economic loss. The results showed an association between PM10 and cardiovascular and respiratory mortality, lagging 3 days. The YLL totaled 231,691.8 years, meaning an overall economic loss of more than US$14.1 billion. In conclusion, knowledge regarding the costs of premature deaths related to air pollution can be used to improve public policy and to facilitate decision making in the context of scarce resources.
Palavras-chave
Particulate matter, Air pollution, Health effects, Economic valuation, Costs
Referências
  1. Abe KC, 2016, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V13, DOI 10.3390/ijerph13070694
  2. [Anonymous], 2016, GLOB HLTH EST 2015 D
  3. Bickel P., 2005, EXTERNE EXTERNALITIE
  4. Braga ALF, 2001, J OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V43, P927
  5. Conceicao GMS, 2001, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V109, P347, DOI 10.2307/3434781
  6. Costa AF, 2016, ENV HLTH PERSPECT, V125, P349
  7. Nascimento LFC, 2016, SAO PAULO MED J, V134, P315, DOI 10.1590/1516-3180.2015.0237250216
  8. Cropper M, 2011, ANNU REV RESOUR ECON, V3, P313, DOI 10.1146/annurev.resource.012809.103949
  9. Dekker T, 2011, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V49, P597, DOI 10.1007/s10640-011-9456-z
  10. Devos S, 2015, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V527, P413, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.104
  11. Miraglia SGE, 2014, CIENC SAUDE COLETIVA, V19, P4141, DOI 10.1590/1413-812320141910.09232014
  12. Franklin BA, 2015, CURR PROB CARDIOLOGY, V40, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2015.01.003
  13. Georges S, 2005, ENVIRON MANAGE, V35, P667, DOI 10.1007/s00267-004-0042-9
  14. Hadei M, 2017, AEROSOL AIR QUAL RES, V17, P2474, DOI 10.4209/aaqr.2017.04.0128
  15. Huang J, 2018, ENVIRON INT, V113, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2018.01.022
  16. Khaefi M, 2017, AEROSOL AIR QUAL RES, V17, P230, DOI 10.4209/aaqr.2015.11.0628
  17. Lee BJ, 2014, TOX RESEARCH, V30, P71, DOI [10.5487/TR.2014.30.2.071, 10.5487/TR.2014.30.2.71]
  18. Martins LC, 2006, REV SAUDE PUBL, V40, P677, DOI 10.1590/s0034-89102006000500018
  19. MMA (Ministerio do Meio Ambiente), 2014, DIAGN RED MON QUAL A
  20. Murray CJ, 1996, GLOBAL BURDEN DIS CO
  21. Pascal M, 2013, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V449, P390, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.077
  22. Perez L, 2013, EUR RESPIR J, V42, P594, DOI 10.1183/09031936.00031112
  23. Pope CA, 2015, CIRC RES, V116, P108, DOI 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.305060
  24. Rodrigues-Silva F, 2012, AEROSOL AIR QUAL RES, V12, P826, DOI 10.4209/aaqr.2011.12.0235
  25. Rojas-Rueda D, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0149990
  26. Romieu Isabelle, 2012, Res Rep Health Eff Inst, P5
  27. SEADE, 2014, PROD INT BRUT PROD I
  28. Shi LH, 2016, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V124, P46, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1409111
  29. Smargiassi A, 2014, ENVIRON RES, V132, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2014.03.030
  30. Vienneau D, 2015, INT J HYG ENVIR HEAL, V218, P514, DOI 10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.05.003
  31. WBG, 2016, COST AIR POLL STRENG
  32. WHO, 2017, AIR QUAL GUID GLOB U
  33. World Health Organization, 2000, EV US EP EV ENV HLTH
  34. Yang J, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V573, P1566, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.014
  35. Zanobetti A, 2003, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V111, P1188, DOI 10.1289/ehp.5712