Expert Consensus on the Use of a New Bioengineered, Cell-Friendly, Smooth Surface Breast Implant

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
41
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
Autores
SFORZA, Marcos
HAMMOND, Dennis C.
BOTTI, Giovanni
HEDEN, Per
QUIROS, Manuel Chacon
KINNEY, Brian M.
CORDUFF, Niamh
Citação
AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, v.39, suppl.3, p.S95-S102, 2019
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background Although general guidelines are available for established silicone gel breast implants, the unique characteristics of the latest Motiva implants warrant specific guidelines. Objectives This study aimed to generate consensus recommendations and summarize expert-based advice to better understand current surgical practices and to establish guidelines for surgeons transitioning from other implant devices to the Motiva implants. Methods A survey was compiled by 12 plastic surgeon experts in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery and 1 biotechnology scientist, and distributed to 36 plastic surgeons to establish a consensus on the use of these devices. Surgical techniques, complication rates, and implant selection were among the topics discussed. Results The experts agreed on 3 core principles regarding the use of Motiva Round and Ergonomix implants. Firstly, the dissected pocket needs to be close fitting and steps must be taken to prevent expansion of the pocket. Secondly, implant selection must be individualized. Finally, surgical planning and technique must be carefully considered. When questioned about problems they had ecountered, 84.6% of the experts agreed that they experienced fewer overall complications and 76.9% confirmed reduced capsular contracture rates with these devices. Overall, 84.6% of the experts favored selecting Motiva Ergonomix implants over Round implants to achieve a more natural look. In addition, 92.3% of the experts agreed that Motiva implants, due to their innovative technology, reduce the risk of anaplastic large-cell lymphoma. Conclusions This international consensus of leading practitioners will assist plastic surgeons with patient selection, preoperative planning, and surgical technique. These recommendations are designed to optimize surgical outcomes, resulting in lower overall complication rates, more natural-looking breasts, and highly satisfied patients.
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. Quiros MC, 2019, AESTHET SURG J, V39, P495, DOI 10.1093/asj/sjy196
  2. Dolores W, 2004, J AUTOIMMUN, V23, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.jaut.2004.03.005
  3. James GA, 2019, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V43, P490, DOI 10.1007/s00266-018-1234-7
  4. Jones P, 2018, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V142, P837, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004801
  5. Kadin ME, 2017, BLOOD, V130
  6. Leberfinger AN, 2017, JAMA SURG, V152, P1161, DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4026
  7. Loch-Wilkinson A, 2017, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V140, P645, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003654
  8. Maxwell GP, 2017, GLAND SURG, V6, P148, DOI 10.21037/gs.2016.11.09
  9. Munhoz AM, 2017, CASE REP PLAST SURG, V4, P99, DOI 10.1080/23320885.2017.1407658
  10. Sforza M, 2016, J SURG OPEN ACCESS, V2, DOI [10.16966/2470-0991.e107, DOI 10.16966/2470-0991.E107]
  11. Sforza M., 2018, J SURG OPEN ACCESS, V4, DOI [10.16966/2470-0991.176, DOI 10.16966/2470-0991.176]
  12. Sforza M, 2018, AESTHET SURG J, V38, pS62, DOI 10.1093/asj/sjx150
  13. Sforza M, 2016, AESTHET SURG J, V36, P886, DOI 10.1093/asj/sjw060