Cushing's disease due to somatic USP8 mutations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
29
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
SPRINGER
Citação
PITUITARY, v.22, n.4, p.435-442, 2019
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
PurposeCushing's disease (CD) is a severe illness generally caused by microcorticotropinomas (MICs) and in approximately 7-20% of patients by macrocorticotropinomas (MACs). USP8-mutations have been identified as a major genetic cause of CD (50%). Few studies have reported the distribution between MICs-MACs related to USP8-mutations and their genotype-phenotype correlations. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate USP8-mutations in a cohort of MICs-MACs from a unique center and to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsDNA-tumor-tissues from 47 corticotropinomas (16 MICs and 31 MACs) were sequenced. Clinical-biochemical data, radiological imaging data and remission/recurrence rates were evaluated. In addition, we performed a meta-analysis of nine published series (n=630).ResultsWe identified four different USP8-mutations previously described, in 11 out of 47 (23.4%) corticotropinomas; 8 out of 11 were MACs. The urinary cortisol levels of our patients with corticotrophin USP8-mutated-alleles were lower than those of patients with wild-type (WT) alleles (p <= 0.017). The frequency of USP8-mutated-alleles among the series was approximately 30% with a higher prevalence in female-patients (p<0.1x10(-4)). Among the 5 series, the remission rates were higher in patients with USP8-mutated-alleles than in those with the USP8-WT-alleles (p<0.1x10(-4)).ConclusionOur data, as well as the retrospective review of CD series associated with USP8-mutated alleles, show heterogeneous findings among the series. Several drawbacks included the lack of a systematic protocol to evaluate these patients before surgery and follow-up. Further prospective studies using a systematic protocol will provide more consistent information about the influence of the corticotropinomas with USP8-mutated alleles on the phenotype, responses to treatment and outcome of patients with CD.
Palavras-chave
Microcorticotropinomas, Macrocorticotropinomas, Ubiquitin specific peptidase 8, Mutations
Referências
  1. Albani A, 2018, CLIN ENDOCRINOL, V89, P454, DOI 10.1111/cen.13802
  2. Ballmann C, 2018, J ENDOCR SOC, V2, P266, DOI 10.1210/js.2017-00364
  3. Bertagna X, 2013, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V98, P1307, DOI 10.1210/jc.2012-3200
  4. Chaidarun SS, 1998, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V83, P3308, DOI 10.1210/jc.83.9.3308
  5. Chen JH, 2018, NAT COMMUN, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-05275-5
  6. Dekkers OM, 2007, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V92, P976, DOI 10.1210/jc.2006-2112
  7. Faucz FR, 2017, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V102, P2836, DOI 10.1210/jc.2017-00161
  8. Feelders RA, 2013, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V98, P425, DOI 10.1210/jc.2012-3126
  9. Hayashi K, 2016, EUR J ENDOCRINOL, V174, P213, DOI 10.1530/EJE-15-0689
  10. Higgins JPT, 2003, BRIT MED J, V327, P557, DOI 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
  11. Javanmard P, 2018, ENDOCRIN METAB CLIN, V47, P313, DOI 10.1016/j.ecl.2018.02.005
  12. Katznelson L, 1998, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V83, P1619, DOI 10.1210/jc.83.5.1619
  13. KNOSP E, 1993, NEUROSURGERY, V33, P610, DOI 10.1227/00006123-199310000-00008
  14. Lindholm J, 2001, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V86, P117, DOI 10.1210/jc.86.1.117
  15. Losa M, 2000, AM J PATHOL, V156, P245, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64725-6
  16. Losa M, 2019, ENDOCRINE, V63, P240, DOI 10.1007/s12020-018-1776-0
  17. Ma ZY, 2015, CELL RES, V25, P306, DOI 10.1038/cr.2015.20
  18. Machado MC, 2016, J ENDOCRINOL INVEST, V39, P1401, DOI 10.1007/s40618-016-0504-y
  19. Machado MC, 2018, ARCH ENDOCRIN METAB, V62, P87, DOI 10.20945/2359-3997000000014
  20. Nieman LK, 2015, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V100, P2807, DOI 10.1210/jc.2015-1818
  21. Oomizu S, 2000, J ENDOCRINOL, V165, P493, DOI 10.1677/joe.0.1650493
  22. Perez-Rivas LG, 2015, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V100, pE997, DOI 10.1210/jc.2015-1453
  23. Reincke M, 2015, NAT GENET, V47, P31, DOI 10.1038/ng.3166
  24. Sbiera S, 2015, TRENDS ENDOCRIN MET, V26, P573, DOI 10.1016/j.tem.2015.08.003
  25. Selvais P, 1998, EUR J ENDOCRINOL, V138, P153, DOI 10.1530/eje.0.1380153
  26. de Araujo LJT, 2017, FRONT ENDOCRINOL, V8, DOI 10.3389/fendo.2017.00055
  27. Weigand I, 2019, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V104, P2535, DOI 10.1210/jc.2018-02564
  28. Woo YS, 2005, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V90, P4963, DOI 10.1210/jc.2005-0070