Development of a Puncture Technique for Implanting Temporary Vascular Shunts in a Porcine Model

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
1
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Citação
ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, v.60, p.455-462, 2019
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background: Temporary vascular shunts (TVSs) are an effective tool for rapidly restoring blood flow to a limb or organ that has experienced vascular injury and ischemia and for which revascularization is not an immediate option. Usually, through an opening in the skin, the TVS is positioned within the proximal and distal stumps of the injured vessel, restoring perfusion and stopping the ischemia. The aim of this study is to compare standard TVS technique and a developed puncture technique for implanting TVS and to evaluate the utility and feasibility of this protocol after arterial lesions, in pigs. Methods: Vascular injuries were inflicted in both hind limbs of 30 pigs, and vascular interventions were performed, using standard and puncture TVS. Because each pig was implanted with both types of TVSs, it was possible to simultaneously monitor, analyze, and compare parameters such as, the mean arterial pressure (MAP, inmmHg), blood flow (mL/min), and insertion times, in the same animal. Results: It was observed that the MAP in the limbs recovered and approached systemic MAP, in 100% of the experiments, in both groups. Analysis of the blood flow data showed that this parameter was significantly reduced in the puncture TVS group (110.36 +/- 9.99 mL/min vs. 153.20 +/- 18.57 mL/min, P = 0.001). On the other hand, the insertion time for the standard TVS was significantly greater than that of the puncture shunt (15.32 +/- 3.08 min vs. 10.37 +/- 1.7 min, P = 0.001). Furthermore, it was found that the primary and secondary patency and complication rates were similar for both TVS types. Conclusion: Thus, given the adequate MAP recovery and reduction in implantation time observed in this experimental and in an animal model study, the use of the puncture TVS technique is effective and feasible.
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. Abou Ali AN, 2017, FRONT SURG, V4, DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2017.00039
  2. Aldridge SD, 1997, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V38, P183
  3. [Anonymous], 1984, ARCH INTERN MED, V144, P1045
  4. Barmparas G, 2010, J PEDIATR SURG, V45, P1404, DOI 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.09.017
  5. Bartlett CS, 2003, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P28, DOI 10.1097/01.blo.0000053164.71678.14
  6. Chambers LW, 2006, J TRAUMA, V61, P824, DOI 10.1097/01.ta.0000197066.74451.f3
  7. Clouse WD, 2007, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V204, P625, DOI 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.040
  8. Dawson DL, 1999, J TRAUMA, V47, P64, DOI 10.1097/00005373-199907000-00016
  9. Goes AMDO, 2014, ANN VASC SURG, V28, P710, DOI 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.10.005
  10. DEBAKEY ME, 1946, ANN SURG, V123, P534, DOI 10.1097/00000658-194604000-00005
  11. EGER M, 1971, SURG GYNECOL OBSTETR, V132, P67
  12. Feliciano DV, 2013, EUR J TRAUMA EMERG S, V39, P553, DOI 10.1007/s00068-011-0171-9
  13. Gillani S, 2012, INJURY, V43, P670, DOI 10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.008
  14. Glass GE, 2009, J PLAST RECONSTR AES, V62, P571, DOI [10.1016/j.bjps.2008.11.117, 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.11.047]
  15. Granchi T, 2000, AM J SURG, V180, P493, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00508-0
  16. Granchi TS, 2000, AM J SURG, V180, P496
  17. Hanley SC, 2015, J VASC SURG, V62, P762, DOI 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.03.072
  18. Holland CK, 1998, ULTRASOUND MED BIOL, V24, P1079, DOI 10.1016/S0301-5629(98)00103-3
  19. Hussain ST, 1996, ULTRASOUND MED BIOL, V22, P287, DOI 10.1016/0301-5629(95)02050-0
  20. Inaba K, 2016, J TRAUMA ACUTE CARE, V80, P359, DOI 10.1097/TA.0000000000000949
  21. Kauvar DS, 2011, J VASC SURG, V53, P1598, DOI 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.01.056
  22. LEWIS P, 1986, ULTRASOUND MED BIOL, V12, P777, DOI 10.1016/0301-5629(86)90075-X
  23. Mullenix PS, 2006, J VASC SURG, V44, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.02.052
  24. NICHOLS JG, 1986, J TRAUMA, V26, P1094, DOI 10.1097/00005373-198612000-00006
  25. Oliver JC, 2013, S AFR J SURG, V51, P6, DOI [10.7196/SAJS.1504, 10.7196/sajs.1504]
  26. Osterberg K, 2014, EUR J VASC ENDOVASC, V48, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.04.007
  27. Perkins ZB, 2012, EUR J VASC ENDOVASC, V44, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.05.013
  28. Rasmussen TE, 2006, J TRAUMA, V61, P8, DOI 10.1097/01.ta.0000220668.84405.17
  29. Reber PU, 1999, J TRAUMA, V47, P72, DOI 10.1097/00005373-199907000-00017
  30. Rowe VL, 2008, J VASC SURG, V47, P1264
  31. Sriussadaporn S, 2002, J TRAUMA, V52, P1129, DOI 10.1097/00005373-200206000-00018
  32. Starnes BW, 2006, J TRAUMA, V60, P432, DOI 10.1097/01.ta.0000197628.55757.de
  33. Subramanian A, 2008, J TRAUMA, V65, P316, DOI 10.1097/TA.0b013e31817e5132
  34. SUTERA SP, 1993, ANNU REV FLUID MECH, V25, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.fl.25.010193.000245
  35. Taller J, 2008, J TRAUMA, V65, P595, DOI 10.1097/TA.0b013e31818234aa
  36. Woodward EB, 2008, J VASC SURG, V47, P1259, DOI 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.052