The PRECEDE-PROCEED model as a tool in Public Health screening: a systematic review

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_SAULLE_The_PRECEDEPROCEED_model_as_a_tool_in_Public_2020.PDF (633.35 KB)
Citações na Scopus
31
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2020
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
SOC EDITRICE UNIV
Autores
SAULLE, R.
SINOPOLI, A.
MANNOCCI, A.
MARINO, M.
BELVIS, A. G. de
FEDERICI, A.
TORRE, G. La
Citação
CLINICA TERAPEUTICA, v.171, n.2, p.E167-E177, 2020
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objective. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the scientific literature concerning the use of the Precede-Proceed model (PPM) applied to educational programs and health screenings contexts. Study design. Systematic review Methods. The search process was based on a selection of publications listed in Medline and Scopus. The keywords used were ""Precede-Proceed"" AND (""screening"" OR ""educational programs""). Studies included in the systematic review were subdivided into those applying the model in a screening context, and those applying it within educational programs. Results. Twenty-seven studies were retrieved, mostly performed in the USA and, generally, the promoting center was the University. In the context of cancer screening, the PPM model was most of all applied to Mammography Screening (5 of 13 studies in cancer screening), and Cervical Cancer Screening (5 of 13). Another three studies within the cancer field investigated Menopause-Inducing Cancer Treatments, Oral cancer prevention, and cancer screening in general. In the remaining studies, the model was applied in various screening areas, particularly chronic and degenerative diseases. There were many different study designs, most of which cross-sectional (8), though several RTCs (8) and focus groups (5) were also found. For the cross-sectional studies the methodological quality varied between 3/10 and 9/10, whilst for the RCTs it ranged from 2/5 to 3/5. Conclusion. The PPM provides an excellent framework for health intervention programs especially in screening contexts, and could improve the understanding of the relationship between variables such as knowledge and screening. Given the complexity of a behavioral change process, certain important predisposing factors could be measured in future studies, and during health intervention planning.
Palavras-chave
Precede-Proceed framework, model, screening, prevention, health
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/36098
Referências
  1. Ahmed Nasar U, 2004, J Ambul Care Manage, V27, P348
  2. Antoniadis A, 1997, J COMMUN DISORD, V30, P269, DOI 10.1016/S0021-9924(97)00003-8
  3. Barasheh N, 2017, DIABETES METAB SYND, V11, pS759, DOI 10.1016/j.dsx.2017.05.012
  4. Cannick GF, 2007, J CANCER EDUC, V22, P250, DOI 10.1007/BF03174125
  5. Chen YJ, 2015, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-1516-9
  6. Chiang Li-Chi, 2004, J ASTHMA, V49, P19
  7. Cole RE, 2009, J NUTR EDUC BEHAV, V41, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.jneb.2008.03.006
  8. Colodny N, 2015, INT J SPEECH-LANG PA, V17, P127, DOI 10.3109/17549507.2014.927924
  9. Constant TKH, 2014, QUAL HEALTH RES, V24, P811, DOI 10.1177/1049732314529476
  10. Crosby R, 2011, J PUBLIC HEALTH DENT, V71, pS7, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00235.x
  11. Di Pietro ML, 2018, CLIN TER, V169, pE71, DOI 10.7417/T.2018.2057
  12. Federici A, 2012, EPIDEMIOL PREV, V36, P1
  13. Gielen AC, 1996, HLTH BEHAV HLTH ED, P512
  14. Gielen AC, 2002, HLTH BEHAV HEATH ED
  15. Green LW, 1991, HLTH PROMOTION PLANN
  16. Green LW, 2004, HLTH PROGRAM PLANNIN
  17. Hatcher J, 2011, J HEALTH CARE POOR U, V22, P176, DOI 10.1353/hpu.2011.0021
  18. Hill MN, 1999, AM J HYPERTENS, V12, P951, DOI 10.1016/S0895-7061(99)00121-1
  19. Hislop TG, 2003, CAN J PUBLIC HEALTH, V94, P68, DOI 10.1007/BF03405056
  20. Hu J, 2009, PUBLIC HEALTH NURS, V26, P500, DOI 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2009.00810.x
  21. Jadad AR, 1996, CONTROL CLIN TRIALS, V17, P1, DOI 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4
  22. Kim MT, 2015, AM J PREV MED, V49, P726, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.033
  23. Kratzke C, 2010, J COMMUN HEALTH, V35, P683, DOI 10.1007/s10900-010-9272-3
  24. Lengerich Eugene J, 2007, J Cancer Surviv, V1, P205, DOI 10.1007/s11764-007-0025-y
  25. McCarthy AL, 2013, PUBLIC HEALTH NURS, V30, P106, DOI 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2012.01045.x
  26. Miller NH, 1997, CIRCULATION, V95, P1085
  27. Mirtz T, 2005, CHIROPRACTIC OSTEOPA, V30, P13
  28. Moher D, 2010, INT J SURG, V8, P336, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
  29. Moshki M, 2017, J WOMEN AGING, P1
  30. Parvanta Maibach E, 2002, PUBLIC HLTH COMMUNIC, P11
  31. Pennington PM, 2017, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V11, P9
  32. Pournaghash-Tehrani S, 2014, INT J IMPOT RES, V26, P16, DOI 10.1038/ijir.2013.27
  33. Schoueri-Mychasiw N, 2013, J IMMIGR MINOR HEALT, V15, P149, DOI 10.1007/s10903-012-9612-8
  34. Shea BJ, 2007, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V7, DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-7-10
  35. Smith PH, 1998, FAM COMMUNITY HEALTH, V20, P1
  36. Soto M, 2018, JMIR MHEALTH UHEALTH, V6, DOI 10.2196/mhealth.9494
  37. Studts CR, 2012, PREV MED, V54, P408, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.03.019
  38. Tarasenko YN, 2011, J CANCER EDUC, V26, P285, DOI 10.1007/s13187-010-0145-3
  39. TAYLOR VM, 1994, PUBLIC HEALTH REP, V109, P491
  40. Torre G, 2015, SENSES SCI, V2, P31, DOI 10.14616/sands-2015-1-3135
  41. Vozza I, 2019, CLIN TER, V170, pE36, DOI 10.7417/CT.2019.2105
  42. Wells G., 2004, NEWCASTLE OTTAWA SCA
  43. Yeo M, 2007, HEALTH EDUC RES, V22, P639, DOI 10.1093/her/cyl126

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/Outros
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - ODS/03