Building a Data Platform for Cross-Country Urban Health Studies: the SALURBAL Study

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
82
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
SPRINGER
Autores
QUISTBERG, D. Alex
ROUX, Ana V. Diez
BILAL, Usama
MOORE, Kari
ORTIGOZA, Ana
RODRIGUEZ, Daniel A.
SARMIENTO, Olga L.
FRENZ, Patricia
FRICHE, Amelia Augusta
CAIAFFA, Waleska Teixeira
Citação
JOURNAL OF URBAN HEALTH-BULLETIN OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE, v.96, n.2, p.311-337, 2019
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Studies examining urban health and the environment must ensure comparability of measures across cities and countries. We describe a data platform and process that integrates health outcomes together with physical and social environment data to examine multilevel aspects of health across cities in 11 Latin American countries. We used two complementary sources to identify cities with 100,000 inhabitants as of 2010 in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, and Peru. We defined cities in three ways: administratively, quantitatively from satellite imagery, and based on country-defined metropolitan areas. In addition to cities, we identified sub-city units and smaller neighborhoods within them using census hierarchies. Selected physical environment (e.g., urban form, air pollution and transport) and social environment (e.g., income, education, safety) data were compiled for cities, sub-city units, and neighborhoods whenever possible using a range of sources. Harmonized mortality and health survey data were linked to city and sub-city units. Finer georeferencing is underway. We identified 371 cities and 1436 sub-city units in the 11 countries. The median city population was 234,553 inhabitants (IQR 141,942; 500,398). The systematic organization of cities, the initial task of this platform, was accomplished and further ongoing developments include the harmonization of mortality and survey measures using available sources for between country comparisons. A range of physical and social environment indicators can be created using available data. The flexible multilevel data structure accommodates heterogeneity in the data available and allows for varied multilevel research questions related to the associations of physical and social environment variables with variability in health outcomes within and across cities. The creation of such data platforms holds great promise to support researching with greater granularity the field of urban health in Latin America as well as serving as a resource for the evaluation of policies oriented to improve the health and environmental sustainability of cities.
Palavras-chave
Urban health, Latin America, Cities, Built environment, Social Environment, Multilevel Models, Mortality, Health Survey
Referências
  1. Angel S, 2016, ATLAS URBAN EXPANSIO, V1
  2. [Anonymous], 2018, IND DEF CARD DIS
  3. [Anonymous], 2018, GLOB STAT REP ALC HL
  4. [Anonymous], 2016, WORLD DEV BOOK CASE
  5. [Anonymous], 2018, IND DEF TOB
  6. [Anonymous], 2018, IND DEF DIAB
  7. [Anonymous], 2018, IND DEF PHYS ACT WEI
  8. Arcaute E, 2015, J R SOC INTERFACE, V12, DOI 10.1098/rsif.2014.0745
  9. Beenackers MA, 2018, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V18, DOI 10.1186/s12889-018-5031-7
  10. Boeing G, 2017, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V65, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.05.004
  11. Boys BL, 2014, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V48, P11109, DOI 10.1021/es502113p
  12. Brinkhoff T., 2017, CITY POPULATION
  13. CAF Banco de Desarollo de America Latina, ENC CAF 2016
  14. Campbell N, 2017, J CLIN HYPERTENS, V19, P456, DOI 10.1111/jch.12980
  15. *CDCP, 2008, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V57, P11
  16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008, MMWR SURVEILL SUMM, V57, P2
  17. Cerda M, 2012, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V175, P1045, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwr428
  18. Chen CC, 2014, SPAT SPATIO-TEMPORAL, V11, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.sste.2014.07.002
  19. Cottineau C, 2017, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V63, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.04.006
  20. Department of Noncommunicable Disease Surveillance, 1999, DEF DIAGN CLASS DIAB
  21. Diabetes Programme, 2016, GLOB PROGR GLOB REP
  22. Diez Roux AV, 2018, GLOB CHALL
  23. Direccion Corporativa de Analisis Economico y Conocimiento para el Desarrollo, 2017, CREC URB ACC OP DES
  24. Division of Evidence and Research-Department of Information, 2017, WHO METH DAT SOURC C
  25. Esch T, 2010, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V48, P905, DOI 10.1109/TGRS.2009.2037144
  26. Esch T, 2017, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V134, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.10.012
  27. European Environmental Agency, 2010, URB ATL
  28. Fang CL, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V162, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.02.014
  29. Frey W. H., 2001, HDB URBAN STUDIES, P14, DOI 10.4135/9781848608375
  30. Galea S, 2005, SOC SCI MED, V60, P1017, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.036
  31. Global Tobacco Surveillance System (GTSS), 2009, GLOB AD TOB SURV GAT
  32. Gomez LF, 2015, SOC SCI MED, V131, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.02.042
  33. Harpham T, 2009, HEALTH PLACE, V15, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.03.004
  34. International Physical Activity Questionnaire, GUIDELINES DATA PROC
  35. Jeffers K, 2017, INT J EPIDEMIOL, V46, P390, DOI 10.1093/ije/dyw321
  36. Jiron P., 2013, SUSTAINABLE URBAN MO
  37. Keola S, 2015, WORLD DEV, V66, P322, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.08.017
  38. Logan JR, 2016, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V106, P1013, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2016.1187060
  39. Logan JR, 2014, PROF GEOGR, V66, P412, DOI 10.1080/00330124.2014.905156
  40. Lovasi GS, 2017, SSM-POPUL HLTH, V3, P600, DOI 10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.07.005
  41. Mc GJ, 2015, RADICAL CITIES LATIN
  42. Mercer L, 2014, SPAT STAT-NETH, V8, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.spasta.2013.12.001
  43. Mindell JS, 2017, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V186, P648, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwx045
  44. Minnesota Population Center, 2018, INTEGRATED PUBLIC US
  45. National Cancer Institute, DIET ASS PRIM FOOD F
  46. Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2017, HLTH GLANC 2017 OECD, DOI 10.1787/health_glance-2017-en
  47. Parr JB, 2007, URBAN STUD, V44, P381, DOI 10.1080/00420980601075059
  48. Patino Villa CA, 2016, DEBATES GOBIERNO URB
  49. Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2017, 2017 REV WORLD POP P
  50. Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2016, WORLDS CIT 2016 DAT
  51. Potere D, 2009, INT J REMOTE SENS, V30, P6531, DOI 10.1080/01431160903121134
  52. Prevention of Noncommunicable Diseases Department SaP-BP, MEAS INT FRUIT VEG
  53. Rabe-Hesketh S, 2006, J R STAT SOC A STAT, V169, P805, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00426.x
  54. Rydin Y, 2012, LANCET, V379, P2079, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60435-8
  55. Singh S, 2017, LANCET, V389, P801, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30518-4
  56. SMITH SJ, 1994, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V5, P381, DOI 10.1097/00001648-199405000-00024
  57. Smith-Warner SA, 2006, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V163, P1053, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwj127
  58. Song L, 2016, PREV CHRONIC DIS, V13, DOI 10.5888/pcd13.150536
  59. Tang L, 2016, J MACH LEARN RES, V17
  60. Taubenbock H, 2012, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V117, P162, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2011.09.015
  61. Teresi JA, 2007, QUAL LIFE RES, V16, P33, DOI 10.1007/s11136-007-9184-6
  62. Tsounta E., 2014, IMF WORKING PAPER
  63. UN-Habitat, 2016, HS03816E UN HAB
  64. van Donkelaar A, 2016, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V50, P3762, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.5b05833
  65. van Donkelaar A, 2015, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V123, P135, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1408646
  66. Wardrop NA, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P3529, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1715305115
  67. WHO, BMI CLASSIFICATION
  68. World Health Organization, MEAS INT FRUIT VEG
  69. World Health Organization, 2019, GLOB STAT REP ALC HL
  70. Zhang XY, 2015, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V182, P127, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwv002
  71. Zhang XY, 2014, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V179, P1025, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwu018
  72. Zhang Z, 2011, PREV CHRONIC DIS, V8
  73. Zhou B, 2017, LANCET, V389, P37, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31919-5