Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination compared with color Doppler ultrasound in the determination of varicocele diagnosis and grading: Impact of urologists' experience

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
12
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2020
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
WILEY
Citação
ANDROLOGY, v.8, n.5, p.1160-1166, 2020
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background Treatment of palpable varicocele in infertile men with abnormal semen parameters is widely accepted, and physical examination (PE) remains a cornerstone for recommending varicocele repair. However, identification of clinical varicocele during PE can be challenging for both urology residents and consultants. Objective To compare the diagnostic accuracy of PE to color Doppler ultrasonography (CDU) for the diagnosis of varicocele in experienced and non-experienced examiners. Materials and methods Diagnostic accuracy study involving 78 patients attending a university-based infertility unit. Patients underwent scrotal PE by both experienced (over 10 years experience in male infertility) and non-experienced urologists (senior residents), and were subjected to CDU. varicocele diagnosis and varicocele grading were compared between examiner groups and to CDU. Accuracy measures were evaluated, and interobserver agreement was estimated using unweighted kappa statistics. A subgroup analysis for normal and high body mass index (BMI) was also performed for the same variables. Results Accuracy of PE for varicocele diagnosis was 63.5% with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 75.5%. The specificity and PPV of PE were higher among experienced than non-experienced urologists (82.0% CI: 74.27-88.26 and 81.1% CI: 74.39-86.44% vs 67.2% CI: 58.33-75.22 and 70.6% CI: 64.52-76.08, respectively). Agreements on varicocele diagnosis (k: 0.625 vs 0.517) and grading (k: 0.548 vs 0.418) by PE were higher among experienced than non-experienced urologists. Differences between eutrophic and overweight/obese patients were also suggested. Discussion and conclusions PE performed by infertility specialists identify patients with varicocele more precisely than non-specialists. However, PE alone has suboptimal accuracy for varicocele diagnosis. Our results indicate that PE should be followed by CDU to decrease the number of false positives and increase the diagnostic accuracy of varicocele diagnosis.
Palavras-chave
Doppler ultrasonography, male infertility, testis, varicocele
Referências
  1. Chiou RK, 1997, UROLOGY, V50, P953, DOI 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00452-4
  2. Chow SCS, 2008, SAMPLE SIZE CALCULAT
  3. DHABUWALA CB, 1992, FERTIL STERIL, V57, P854
  4. DUBIN L, 1970, FERTIL STERIL, V21, P606
  5. Gat Y, 2004, J UROLOGY, V172, P1414, DOI 10.1097/01.ju.0000138540.57137.5f
  6. Hamada A, 2016, VARICOCELE MALE INFE, P37
  7. Handel LN, 2006, J UROLOGY, V176, P2138, DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.023
  8. HARGREAVE TB, 1991, BRIT J UROL, V67, P328, DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1991.tb15148.x
  9. Jarow JP, 1996, J UROLOGY, V155, P1287, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66245-1
  10. Jungwirth A, 2012, EUR UROL, V62, P324, DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.04.048
  11. Kroese ACJ, 2012, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD000479.pub5
  12. Liguori G, 2004, WORLD J UROL, V22, P378, DOI 10.1007/s00345-004-0421-0
  13. Male Infertility Best Practice Policy Committee of the American Urological Association and Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2006, FERTIL STERIL, V86, pS202, DOI 10.1016/J.FERTNSTERT.2006.08.029
  14. MARSMAN JWP, 1994, HUM REPROD, V9, P1
  15. Pilatz A, 2011, WORLD J UROL, V29, P645, DOI 10.1007/s00345-011-0701-4
  16. Practice Comm Amer Soc Reprod Med, 2014, FERTIL STERIL, V102, P1556, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.007
  17. Schiff JD, 2006, FERTIL STERIL, V86, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.12.038
  18. Tanrikut C, 2006, J UROLOGY, V176, P1912, DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.040
  19. Trum JW, 1996, HUM REPROD, V11, P1232
  20. Unal D, 2001, INT J UROL, V8, P227, DOI 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2001.00289.x
  21. Viera AJ, 2005, FAM MED, V37, P360
  22. Yamamoto M, 1996, J UROLOGY, V155, P1636, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66149-4