Social distancing patterns in nine municipalities of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil: the Epicovid19/RS study

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
17
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2020
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA
Autores
BARROS, Aluisio J. D.
VICTORA, Cesar G.
MENEZES, Ana M. B.
HORTA, Bernardo L.
HARTWIG, Fernando
VICTORA, Gabriel
PELLANDA, Lucia C.
DELLAGOSTIN, Odir A.
STRUCHINER, Claudio J.
Citação
REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, v.54, p.29-42, 2020
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
OBJECTIVE: To describe social distancing practices in nine municipalities of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, stratified by gender, age, and educational attainment. METHODS: Two sequential cross-sectional studies were conducted in the municipalities of Canoas, Caxias do Sul, Ijui, Passo Fundo, Pelotas, Porto Alegre, Santa Cruz do Sul, Santa Maria, and Uruguaiana to estimate the population prevalence of COVID-19. The study was designed to be representative of the urban population of these municipalities. A questionnaire including three questions about social distancing was also administered to the participants. Here, we present descriptive analyses of social distancing practices by subgroups and use chi-square tests for comparisons. RESULTS: In terms of degree of social distancing, 25.8% of the interviewees reported being essentially isolated and 41.1% reported being quite isolated. 20.1% of respondents reported staying at home all the time, while 44.5% left only for essential activities. More than half of households reported receiving no visits from non-residents. Adults aged 20 to 59 reported the least social distancing, while more than 80% of participants aged 60 years or older reported being essentially isolated or quite isolated. Women reported more stringent distancing than men. Groups with higher educational attainment reported going out for daily activities more frequently. CONCLUSIONS: The extremes of age are more protected by social distancing, but some groups remain highly exposed. This can be an important limiting factor in controlling progression of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Palavras-chave
Coronavirus Infections, prevention & control, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Health Risk Behaviors, Socioeconomic Factors
Referências
  1. Baumgartner MT, 2020, SOCIAL DISTANCING MO, DOI [10.1101/2020.05.02.20088013, DOI 10.1101/2020.05.02.20088013]
  2. Chu DK, 2020, LANCET, pS0140
  3. Cowling BJ, 2020, LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, V5, pE279, DOI 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30090-6
  4. Hallal PC, 2020, CIENC SAUDE COLETIVA, V25, P2395, DOI 10.1590/1413-81232020256.1.09632020
  5. Li X, 2020, NAT CELL BIOL, V2020, P1
  6. Moraes RF, 2020, 16 IPEA
  7. Nussbaumer-Streit B, 2020, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD013574
  8. Oliveira CA, 2020, SSRN ELECT J, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3593947, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3593947]
  9. Oliveira SB, 2020, MONITORING SOCIAL DI, DOI [10.1101/2020.04.30.20082172, DOI 10.1101/2020.04.30.20082172]
  10. Pellanda LC, 2020, SENSITIVITY SPECIFIC, P1, DOI [10.1101/2020.05.06.20093476, DOI 10.1101/2020.05.06.20093476]
  11. Silveira M., 2020, REPEATED POPULATION, DOI [10.1101/2020.05.01.20087205, DOI 10.1101/2020.05.01.20087205]
  12. Zhou F, 2020, LANCET, V395, P1054, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3