Association of adductor pollicis muscle thickness and handgrip strength with nutritional status in hospitalized individuals

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_COSTA_Association_of_adductor_pollicis_muscle_thickness_and_handgrip_2021.PDF (668.75 KB)
Citações na Scopus
3
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2021
DOI
SciELO
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ARAN EDICIONES, S L
Autores
COSTA, Talita Yoshimura da
SUGANUMA, Juliana Yukari
SPEXOTO, Maria Claudia Bernardes
Citação
NUTRICION HOSPITALARIA, v.38, n.3, p.519-524, 2021
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background: malnutrition is common in hospitalized patients and early diagnosis can contribute to better clinical and nutritional outcomes. Adductor pollicis muscle thickness (APMT) and handgrip strength (HGS) have been used to identify reductions in strength and muscle mass, associated or not with conventional methods. Objective: we aimed to correlate APMT and HGS with conventional anthropometric variables in hospitalized patients, and assess their relationship with nutritional status as evaluated by the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) method. Methods: a cross-sectional study was conducted in patients of both sexes admitted to a University Hospital in Brazil. APMT, HGS, and conventional measures were used for anthropometric assessment. PG-SGA was used for the assessment of nutritional status. Results: the sample included 73 patients (66.9 +/- 9.6 years). Most patients were admitted for surgery procedures (53.4 %) and had an adequate body mass index (BMI) (47.9 %), while according to PG-SGA most patients (67.1 %) had some degree of malnutrition (B and C). Right-hand (R) APMT was significantly correlated with corrected arm muscle area (cAMA), calf circumference (CC), and HGS. Left-hand (L) APMT was significantly correlated with cAMA, arm circumference (AC), CC, PG-SGA score, and HGS. Both HGS values (R/L) were significantly correlated with CC, PG-SGA score, and APMT. Conclusions: APMT and HGS were significantly correlated with the conventional anthropometric measure CC. In addition, the significant correlation observed between HGS, APMT, and PG-SGA highlights them as complementary assessments of nutritional status in clinical practice and for research purposes.
Palavras-chave
Handgrip strength, Nutritional status, PG-SGA
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/41613
Referências
  1. ABEP, 2018, ALTERACOES APLICACAO
  2. Beaudart C, 2016, BMC GERIATR, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12877-016-0349-4
  3. Bielemann RM, 2016, CLIN NUTR, V35, P1073, DOI [10.1016/j. clnu.2015.07.022, DOI 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.07.022]
  4. Bjorkman M, 2019, J NUTR HEALTH AGING, V23, P916, DOI 10.1007/s12603-019-1280-0
  5. Bragagnolo Rosalia, 2009, Rev. Col. Bras. Cir., V36, P371
  6. Crestani N, 2011, REV CIENCIA SAUDE, V4, P45
  7. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, 2019, AGE AGEING, V48, P16, DOI 10.1093/ageing/afy169
  8. Dodds RM, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0113637
  9. El Kik RM, 2018, NUTR HOSP, V35, P1059, DOI 10.20960/nh.1739
  10. FerroLuzzi A, 1995, WHO TECH REP SER, V854, P1
  11. Gonzalez MC, 2010, REV BRAS NUTR CLIN, V2, P102
  12. Jager-Wittenaar H, 2017, CURR OPIN CLIN NUTR, V20, P322, DOI 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000389
  13. Janssen I, 2002, J AM GERIATR SOC, V50, P889, DOI 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50216.x
  14. Karst Fernanda Pickrodt, 2015, Rev. bras. ter. intensiva, V27, P369, DOI 10.5935/0103-507X.20150062
  15. Lameu EB, 2005, REV SOCERJ, V18, P384
  16. Landi F, 2014, CLIN NUTR, V33, P539, DOI 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.07.013
  17. Lew CCH, 2016, CLIN NUTR ESPEN, V16, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.clnesp.2016.08.005
  18. Lim JY, 2016, INTEGR MED RES, V5, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.imr.2016.06.003
  19. LIPSCHITZ DA, 1994, PRIMARY CARE, V21, P55
  20. Lohman TG, 1988, ANTHROPOMETRIC STAND, V177
  21. Martinez Bruno Prata, 2016, Rev. bras. geriatr. gerontol., V19, P257, DOI 10.1590/1809-98232016019.140228
  22. Nascimento MF, 2010, REV DIG BUENOS AIRES, P151
  23. Pereira Priscila Moreira de Lima, 2019, Braz. J. Nephrol., V41, P65, DOI [10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2018-0122, 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2018-0122]
  24. Schlussel MM, 2008, REV NUTR, V21, P223, DOI 10.1590/S1415-52732008000200009
  25. Singh DKA, 2015, CLIN INTERV AGING, V10, P1319, DOI [DOI 10.2147/CIA.S79398, 10.2147/CIA.S79398]
  26. Toledo DO, 2018, BRASPEN J, V1, P86
  27. Valente KP, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0220334
  28. Valente KP, 2016, EINSTEIN-SAO PAULO, V14, P18, DOI 10.1590/S1679-45082016AO3596
  29. Waitzberg DL, 2017, NUTR HOSP, V34, P969, DOI 10.20960/nh.1098

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/Outros
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/38
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - ODS/02