The impact of stressors and overload on informal caregivers of patients with cirrhosis: The first use of the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers in Brazil

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
3
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2022
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
Citação
JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, v.27, n.2, p.408-421, 2022
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Introduction: Cirrhosis affects liver functions and compromises much of the body's organs. The significant increase in chronic diseases, including cirrhosis, has led to changes in medical practice and health systems, leading the informal caregiver to play a major role because of family ties or some level of proximity to the patient, assuming daily care function. However, the burden generated by informal caregivers for uninterrupted care is present at different levels (physical, mental, social, professional, and financial) and even in the prognosis of the patient. Objective: The present study aims to evaluate the impact of stressors and overload on informal caregivers of cirrhosis patients. Method: Cross-sectional study, conducted with 54 informal caregivers of cirrhosis patients, followed up at the Liver Transplant Service Outpatient Clinic of the University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine Hospital das Clinicas, where they had access to a sociodemographic questionnaire, history of the patient's disease and the scale Burden Scale for Family Caregivers. Results: It was observed that higher levels of education and income of the caregiver correlates with a lower degree of stress. In addition, there is a significant difference found in the caregiver's age variable, which indicates that the youngest are those who have the highest degree of stress. The variable Na mEg/l of the patient also presents a statistically significant difference. Conclusion: Our study was a precursor using the BSFC scale of worldwide coverage and that had not yet been applied in any study in Brazil, thus allowing a look at the various aspects that affect the quality of life of caregivers of patients with cirrhosis. Our results and the literature corroborate the importance not only of the patient, but also the informal caregiver's health.
Palavras-chave
Burden Scale for Family Caregivers, caregivers, chronic illness, informal caregiver, liver cirrhosis
Referências
  1. Abdi F, 2015, GASTROENTEROL NURS, V38, P252, DOI 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000122
  2. [Anonymous], 2003, ESTR TAB CONV IND TI
  3. Antonana JM, 2001, ARCH BRONCONEUMOL, V37, P489, DOI 10.1016/S0300-2896(01)75128-9
  4. Asrani Sumeet K, 2013, Curr Gastroenterol Rep, V15, P308, DOI 10.1007/s11894-012-0308-y
  5. Bajaj JS, 2011, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V106, P1646, DOI 10.1038/ajg.2011.157
  6. Bastianelli A, 2016, J HEALTH PSYCHOL, V21, P844, DOI 10.1177/1359105314539533
  7. Blachier M, 2013, J HEPATOL, V58, P593, DOI 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.12.005
  8. Bolden L, 2010, ARCH PSYCHIAT NURS, V24, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.apnu.2009.04.010
  9. Carod-Artal FJ, 2013, PARKINSONISM RELAT D, V19, P943, DOI 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.06.005
  10. Chiu T, 2003, DEV VALIDATION BURDE
  11. Cohen, 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
  12. de Oliveira-Monteiro NR, 2018, MOJ GERONTOLOGY GERI, V3, P188
  13. Divajeva D, 2014, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V14, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-456
  14. Donelan K, 2002, HEALTH AFFAIR, V21, P222, DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.21.4.222
  15. Ekwall A, 2004, SCAND J CARING SCI, V18, P239, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2004.00283.x
  16. Githaiga JN, 2017, J HEALTH PSYCHOL, V22, P1591, DOI 10.1177/1359105316631199
  17. Gresswell I, 2018, IRISH J PSYCHOL MED, V35, P43, DOI 10.1017/ipm.2017.36
  18. Holtzman S, 2011, J HEALTH PSYCHOL, V16, P843, DOI 10.1177/1359105310393542
  19. Joo JY, 2018, INT NURS REV, V65, P102, DOI 10.1111/inr.12429
  20. Jutten LH, 2019, INT J CLIN HLTH PSYC, V19, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.ijchp.2018.07.004
  21. Konerding U, 2019, AM J ALZHEIMERS DIS, V34, P148, DOI 10.1177/1533317518822047
  22. Konietschke F, 2015, J STAT SOFTW, V64
  23. Kunzler-Heule P, 2016, J CLIN NURS, V25, P2559, DOI 10.1111/jocn.13298
  24. Lim Jung-won, 2004, Health Qual Life Outcomes, V2, P50
  25. Lou Q, 2015, J CLIN NURS, V24, P2668, DOI 10.1111/jocn.12870
  26. Low JTS, 2018, J HEPATOL, V69, P1260, DOI 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.08.028
  27. Martinez-Martin P, 2006, MOVEMENT DISORD, V21, P208, DOI 10.1002/mds.20697
  28. McCullagh E, 2005, STROKE, V36, P2181, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000181755.23914.53
  29. Miyazaki ET, 2010, LIVER TRANSPLANT, V16, P1164, DOI 10.1002/lt.22130
  30. Monteiro Edilene Araújo, 2015, Rev. Bras. Enferm., V68, P421, DOI 10.1590/0034-7167.2015680307i
  31. Meyer ALM, 2009, CLINICS, V64, P877, DOI 10.1590/S1807-59322009000900008
  32. Nguyena DL, 2015, ANN GASTROENTEROL, V28, P124
  33. Pereira JCRPP-SP, 2010, BIOESTATISTICA OUTRA
  34. Rakoski MO, 2012, HEPATOLOGY, V55, P184, DOI 10.1002/hep.24616
  35. Sautter JM, 2014, J AM GERIATR SOC, V62, P1082, DOI 10.1111/jgs.12841
  36. Scazufca M, 2002, SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID, V37, P416, DOI 10.1007/s00127-002-0571-6
  37. Serra Desfilis E, 1998, ANALES PSICOLOGIA, V14, P215
  38. Siegel S. CN, 1998, NONPARAMETRIC STAT
  39. Silva ISS, 2011, REV BRASILEIRA EDUCA, DOI [10.1590/S1413-24782011000200001, DOI 10.1590/S1413-24782011000200001]
  40. Valery PC, 2015, BMJ OPEN, V5, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007451
  41. Vedhara K, 2000, PSYCHOSOM MED, V62, P374, DOI 10.1097/00006842-200005000-00011
  42. Yikilkan H, 2014, ARCH PSYCHIAT NURS, V28, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.apnu.2014.01.001