Female Sexual Function and Gestational Diabetes

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_RIBEIRO_Female_Sexual_Function_and_Gestational_Diabetes_2012.PDF (95.79 KB)
Citações na Scopus
22
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2012
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
WILEY-BLACKWELL
Autores
RIBEIRO, Meireluci Costa
NAKAMURA, Mary Uchiyama
TORLONI, Maria Regina
MATTAR, Rosiane
Citação
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, v.9, n.3, p.786-792, 2012
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Introduction. The number of women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is growing worldwide in parallel with the obesity epidemic. The diagnosis of GDM leads to substantial modifications in the daily routine of these women, and these adjustments could potentially affect their sexual function. There are no previous studies on the sexual function of patients with GDM. Aim. The aim of this study was to investigate the sexual function of patients with GDM in comparison with healthy pregnant women at the same gestational age. Methods. Brazilian women in the third trimester of pregnancy with and without GDM were invited to participate in this cross-sectional study while waiting for their antenatal care visits at a single public tertiary teaching institution between March and December 2010. The Brazilian version of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire was used to assess sexual function. Main Outcome Measures. Desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, sexual satisfaction, and pain during and after coitus in the last 4 weeks, measured according to a standardized and validated questionnaire. Results. A total of 87 participants were enrolled (43 healthy women and 44 with GDM). There were no significant differences in the sociodemographic characteristics of both groups. The total FSFI scores of GDM patients was 21.0 +/- 9.59 compared with 22.3 +/- 9.17 for healthy women (P = 0.523). Difficulty in desire was the most common sexual dysfunction symptom in both groups, being reported by 42% and 50% of GDM and healthy women, respectively (P = 0.585). Conclusion. The sexual function of Brazilian patients with GDM does not differ significantly from that of healthy pregnant women at the same gestational age. Ribeiro MC, Nakamura MU, Scanavino Mde T, Torloni MR, and Mattar R. Female sexual function and gestational diabetes. J Sex Med 2012; 9: 786-792.
Palavras-chave
Female Sexual Function, Gestational Diabetes, Sexual Dysfunctions, Pregnancy, Sexuality
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/4568
Referências
  1. Abdo CHN, 2010, MENOPAUSE, V17, P1114, DOI 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181e19755
  2. American Diabetes Association, 2011, DIABETES CARE S1, V34, pS62, DOI 10.2337/DC11-S062
  3. Aslan G, 2005, INT J IMPOT RES, V17, P154, DOI 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901288
  4. Bartellas E, 2000, BRIT J OBSTET GYNAEC, V107, P964, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb10397.x
  5. Basson R, 2008, INT J IMPOT RES, V20, P466, DOI 10.1038/ijir.2008.23
  6. Basson R, 2001, J SEX REPROD MED, V1, P11
  7. Bello F, 2010, OBSTET GYNECOL, V2011, P1
  8. BOGREN LY, 1991, ARCH SEX BEHAV, V20, P35, DOI 10.1007/BF01543006
  9. Brody SC, 2003, OBSTET GYNECOL, V101, P380, DOI 10.1016/S0029-7844(02)03057-0
  10. Brtnicka H, 2009, BRATISL MED J, V110, P427
  11. Daniells S, 2003, DIABETES CARE, V26, P385, DOI 10.2337/diacare.26.2.385
  12. Dragonas T, 1998, CLIN PSYCHOL REV, V18, P127, DOI 10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00085-8
  13. Enzlin P, 2003, DIABETES CARE, V26, P409, DOI 10.2337/diacare.26.2.409
  14. Enzlin P, 1998, DIABETIC MED, V15, P809, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199810)15:10<809::AID-DIA689>3.0.CO;2-Z
  15. Erol B, 2007, J SEX MED, V4, P1381, DOI 10.1111/i.1743-6109,2007.00559.x
  16. Fahs B, 2010, ARCH SEX BEHAV, V5, P913
  17. Fok WY, 2005, ACTA OBSTET GYN SCAN, V84, P934, DOI 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00743.x
  18. FRANK E, 1978, NEW ENGL J MED, V299, P111, DOI 10.1056/NEJM197807202990302
  19. Gokyildiz S, 2005, J SEX MARITAL THER, V31, P201, DOI 10.1080/00926230590513410
  20. Kaplan H, 1979, J SEX MARITAL THER, V3, P3
  21. Kennedy CM, 2009, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V105, P236, DOI 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.01.024
  22. Kerdarunsuksri Attapol, 2010, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, V93, P265
  23. Khamis Mervat A, 2007, J Egypt Public Health Assoc, V82, P65
  24. Kozhimannil KB, 2009, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V301, P842, DOI 10.1001/jama.2009.201
  25. Leite A. P. L., 2007, Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, V29, P396, DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032007000800003
  26. Leite APL, 2009, REV ASSOC MED BRAS, V55, P563, DOI 10.1590/S0104-42302009000500020
  27. Naldoni LMV, 2011, J SEX MARITAL THER, V37, P116, DOI 10.1080/0092623X.2011.560537
  28. Pauleta JR, 2010, J SEX MED, V7, P136, DOI 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01538.x
  29. Pauls RN, 2008, J SEX MED, V5, P1915, DOI 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00884.x
  30. Perkins JM, 2007, CLIN DIABETES, V25, P57, DOI 10.2337/diaclin.25.2.57
  31. Rosen R, 2000, J SEX MARITAL THER, V26, P191, DOI 10.1080/009262300278597
  32. ROSEN RC, 1993, J SEX MARITAL THER, V19, P171
  33. Schmidt MI, 2001, DIABETES CARE, V24, P1151, DOI 10.2337/diacare.24.7.1151
  34. Serati M, 2010, J SEX MED, V7, P2782, DOI 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01893.x
  35. Shojaa M, 2009, ARCH GYNECOL OBSTET, V279, P353, DOI 10.1007/s00404-008-0735-z
  36. SPECTOR IP, 1990, ARCH SEX BEHAV, V19, P389, DOI 10.1007/BF01541933
  37. Trutnovsky G, 2006, AUST NZ J OBSTET GYN, V46, P282, DOI 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2006.00592.x
  38. Wiegel M, 2005, J SEX MARITAL THER, V31, P1, DOI 10.1080/00926230590475206

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/IPq