Is work-family conflict a pathway between job strain components and binge eating? A cross-sectional analysis from the ELSA-Brasil study
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
2
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2022
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
BMC
Autores
JUVANHOL, Leidjaira Lopes
SILVA-COSTA, Aline
ROTENBERG, Lucia
MORENO, Arlinda B.
MELO, Enirtes Caetano Prates
NUNES, Maria Angelica Antunes
TOIVANEN, Susanna
CHOR, Dora
GRIEP, Rosane Harter
Citação
JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS, v.10, n.1, article ID 16, 9p, 2022
Resumo
Background Job strain has been reported as a trigger for binge eating, yet the underlying mechanisms have been unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether work-family conflict is a pathway in the association between job strain and binge eating, considering the possible effect-modifying influence of body mass index (BMI). Methods This cross-sectional analysis included 12,084 active civil servants from the multicenter Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). Job strain was assessed using the Demand-Control-Support Questionnaire. Work-family conflict was considered as a latent variable comprising three items. Binge eating was defined as eating a large amount of food in less than 2 h at least twice a week in the last six months with a sense of lack of control over what and how much was eaten. Structural equation modelling was used to test the role of work-family conflict in the association between job strain and binge eating, stratifying for BMI. Results For individuals of normal weight, positive associations were found between skill discretion and binge eating (standardized coefficient [SC] = 0.209, 95%CI = 0.022-0.396), and between psychological job demands and work-family conflict (SC = 0.571, 95%CI = 0.520-0.622), but no statistically significant indirect effect was found. In overweight individuals, psychological job demands, skill discretion, and work-family conflict were positively associated with binge eating (SC = 0.099, 95%CI = 0.005-0.193; SC = 0.175, 95%CI = 0.062-0.288; and SC = 0.141, 95%CI = 0.077-0.206, respectively). Also, work-family conflict was observed to be a pathway on the associations of psychological job demands and decision authority with binge eating (SC = 0.084, 95%CI = 0.045-0.122; and SC = - 0.008, 95%CI = - 0.015- - 0.001, respectively). Conclusions Work-family conflict partly explains effects of high levels of psychological job demands and low levels of decision authority on binge eating among overweight individuals. Moreover, skill discretion is positively associated with binge eating, regardless of BMI category. Plain English summary Recent studies have found work-family conflict (i.e., incompatible work and family demands) to link between work issues and physical and mental health. Accordingly, this study investigated whether the relationship between job strain and binge eating is explained by work-family conflict, by body mass index (BMI), in a large sample of Brazilian civil servants. Overall, this study demonstrated that, among overweight individuals, excessive job demands and low decision authority (over what to do at work and how) contribute to binge eating by increasing work-family conflict. Also, excessive skill discretion at work, including opportunities to acquire and use specific job skills, is related to binge eating, regardless of BMI, which deserves further investigation. In conclusion, the results indicate that work-family conflict is a potential mechanism through which job strain can affect eating behavior among overweight individuals.
Palavras-chave
Eating disorder, Eating behavior, Occupational stress, Job stress, Psychological stress, Obesity
Referências
- Alves MGD, 2004, REV SAUDE PUBL, V38, P164, DOI 10.1590/S0034-89102004000200003
- American Psychiatric Association, 2013, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, DOI [DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596, 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596]
- American Psychiatric Association, 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, V4th
- Bean CG, 2015, SOC SCI MED, V143, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.034
- Gralle APBP, 2017, J OCCUP HEALTH, V59, P247, DOI 10.1539/joh.16-0157-OA
- Carvalho VS, 2018, FRONT PSYCHOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00966
- Chor D, 2013, REV SAUDE PUBL, V47, P27, DOI 10.1590/S0034-8910.2013047003835
- de Araujo TM, 2008, SCAND J WORK ENV HEA, P52
- de Freitas SR, 2008, INT J EAT DISORDER, V41, P471, DOI 10.1002/eat.20530
- FRONE MR, 1992, J APPL PSYCHOL, V77, P65, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.77.1.65
- Frone MR, 1997, J OCCUP ORGAN PSYCH, V70, P325, DOI 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1997.tb00652.x
- Fujishiro K, 2015, INT J OBESITY, V39, P1395, DOI 10.1038/ijo.2015.91
- Galmiche M, 2019, AM J CLIN NUTR, V109, P1402, DOI 10.1093/ajcn/nqy342
- GANSTER DC, 1989, JOB CONTROL WORKER H, P3
- GREENHAUS JH, 1985, ACAD MANAGE REV, V10, P76, DOI 10.5465/AMR.1985.4277352
- Griep RH, 2016, AM J IND MED, V59, P987, DOI 10.1002/ajim.22620
- Griep RH, 2016, INT J BEHAV MED, V23, P372, DOI 10.1007/s12529-015-9523-x
- Haines J, 2010, ARCH PEDIAT ADOL MED, V164, P336, DOI 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.19
- Hair J.F., 2009, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN, V7th
- Hu LT, 1999, STRUCT EQU MODELING, V6, P1, DOI 10.1080/10705519909540118
- Joensuu M, 2012, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V175, P609, DOI 10.1093/aje/kws028
- Juvanhol LL, 2017, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V14, DOI 10.3390/ijerph14040451
- Prisco APK, 2013, CIENC SAUDE COLETIVA, V18, P1109, DOI 10.1590/S1413-81232013000400024
- KARASEK RA, 1979, ADMIN SCI QUART, V24, P285, DOI 10.2307/2392498
- Karasek RA., 1990, HLTH WORK STRESS PRO, P408
- Kawakami N, 1995, INT J BEHAV MED, V2, P358, DOI 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0204_5
- Kessler RC, 2013, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V73, P904, DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.11.020
- Kivimaki M, 2006, INT J OBESITY, V30, P982, DOI 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803229
- Koura U, 2017, PUBLIC HEALTH, V153, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.08.010
- Lapierre LM, 2006, J OCCUP HEALTH PSYCH, V11, P169, DOI 10.1037/1076-8998.11.2.169
- Hokerberg YHM, 2014, REV SAUDE PUBL, V48, P486, DOI 10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005126
- Hokerberg YHM, 2010, INT ARCH OCC ENV HEA, V83, P407, DOI 10.1007/s00420-009-0488-4
- Micali N, 2015, OBESITY, V23, P1729, DOI 10.1002/oby.21147
- Di Bonaventura EM, 2020, NUTRIENTS, V12, DOI 10.3390/nu12113502
- Moen P, 2015, RES SOCIOL WORK, V26, P177, DOI 10.1108/S0277-283320150000026014
- Molina KM, 2013, ANN BEHAV MED, V45, P33, DOI 10.1007/s12160-012-9421-2
- Muratore AF, 2019, INT J EAT DISORDER, V52, P117, DOI 10.1002/eat.23029
- Muthen L.K., 2015, MPLUS USERS GUIDE, V7th
- Neto M, 2018, OCCUP MED-OXFORD, V68, P364, DOI 10.1093/occmed/kqy079
- Nishitani N, 2009, NUTRITION, V25, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.nut.2008.07.008
- Olguin P, 2017, EAT WEIGHT DISORD-ST, V22, P13, DOI 10.1007/s40519-016-0313-5
- Oshio T, 2017, BMJ OPEN, V7, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015608
- Pacak K, 2001, ENDOCR REV, V22, P502, DOI 10.1210/er.22.4.502
- Pinto KA, 2016, REV SAUDE PUBL, V50, DOI 10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050005892
- Razzoli M, 2017, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V76, P154, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.026
- Roos E, 2007, PUBLIC HEALTH NUTR, V10, P222, DOI 10.1017/S1368980007248487
- Rosenberg N, 2013, PSYCHIAT RES, V208, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.09.050
- Sanne B, 2005, SCAND J PUBLIC HEALT, V33, P166, DOI 10.1080/14034940410019217
- Schmidt MI, 2015, INT J EPIDEMIOL, V44, P68, DOI 10.1093/ije/dyu027
- Schmidt MI, 2013, REV SAUDE PUBL, V47, P105, DOI 10.1590/S0034-8910.2013047003889
- Schulz S, 2012, APPETITE, V58, P457, DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2011.12.007
- Shukri M, 2018, APPETITE, V123, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2017.12.027
- Souza da Silva Thamyres, 2016, J Eat Disord, V4, P25
- Sugawara N, 2017, NEUROPSYCH DIS TREAT, V13, P779, DOI 10.2147/NDT.S127053
- Takaki J, 2010, J OCCUP HEALTH, V52, P66, DOI 10.1539/joh.M9006
- Torres SJ, 2007, NUTRITION, V23, P887, DOI 10.1016/j.nut.2007.08.008
- Viotti S, 2016, INT J OCCUP MED ENV, V29, P439, DOI 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00520
- Zhou SY, 2018, FRONT PSYCHOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00544