Fat Grafts Supplemented with Adipose-Derived Stromal Cells in the Rehabilitation of Patients with Craniofacial Microsomia

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
107
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2013
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Autores
AGUENA, Meire
BUENO, Daniela F.
PASSOS-BUENO, Maria Rita
Citação
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, v.132, n.1, p.141-152, 2013
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background: Although first reports of the clinical use of adipose-derived stromal cells suggest that this approach may be feasible and effective for soft-tissue augmentation, there is a lack of randomized, controlled clinical trials in the literature. Thus, this study aimed to investigate whether a faster protocol for isolation of adipose-derived stromal cells and their use in combination with fat tissue improve the long-term retention of the grafts in patients with craniofacial microsomia. Methods: Patients with craniofacial microsomia (n = 14) were grafted either with supplementation of adipose-derived stromal cells (experimental group) or without supplementation of adipose-derived stromal cells (control group). The number of viable cells isolated before and after the supplementation of the grafts was calculated, and these cells were examined for mesenchymal cell surface markers using flow cytometry. Computed tomography was performed to assess both hemifaces preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Results: The average number of viable cells isolated before and after the supplementation of the grafts was 5.6 x 10(5) and 9.9 x 10(5) cells/ml of fat tissue (p = 0.015). Flow cytometric analysis revealed that the adipose-derived stromal cells were positive for mesenchymal cell markers (>95 percent for CD73 and CD105). Surviving fat volume at 6 months was 88 percent for the experimental group and 54 percent for the control group (p = 0.003). Conclusion: These results suggest that this strategy for isolation and supplementation of adipose-derived stromal cells is effective, safe, and superior to conventional lipoinjection for facial recontouring in patients with craniofacial microsomia.
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. Aguena M, 2012, STEM CELLS INT, V2012
  2. Coleman SR, 2006, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V118, p108S, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000234610.81672.e7
  3. Conde-Green A, 2010, AESTHET SURG J, V30, P249, DOI 10.1177/1090820X10369512
  4. Eto H, 2009, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V124, P1087, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b5a3f1
  5. Faustini M, 2010, TISSUE ENG PART C-ME, V16, P1515, DOI 10.1089/ten.TEC.2010.0214
  6. Fontdevila Joan, 2008, Aesthet Surg J, V28, P380, DOI 10.1016/j.asj.2008.05.002
  7. Fraser JK, 2006, TRENDS BIOTECHNOL, V24, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.01.010
  8. Goldenberg DC, 2007, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V18, P302, DOI 10.1097/scs.0b013e3180336012
  9. Gougoutas AJ, 2007, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V120, p112E, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000287383.35963.5e
  10. Hamed S, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0013986
  11. HORGAN JE, 1995, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V32, P405, DOI 10.1597/1545-1569(1995)032<0405:OPAOCA>2.3.CO;2
  12. Inigo F, 2000, MICROSURG, V20, P167, DOI 10.1002/1098-2752(2000)20:4<167::AID-MICR4>3.0.CO;2-D
  13. Josse C, 2010, STEM CELLS DEV, V19, P1167, DOI 10.1089/scd.2009.0264
  14. Karaaltin MV, 2012, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V23, pE103, DOI 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182418ce8
  15. Kato H, 2010, TISSUE ENG PT A, V16, P2029, DOI 10.1089/ten.TEA.2009.0551
  16. Kaufman MR, 2007, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V119, P2287, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000260712.44089.e7
  17. Kaufman MR, 2007, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V119, P323, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000244903.51440.8c
  18. Khouri R, 2009, CLIN PLAST SURG, V36, P269, DOI 10.1016/j.cps.2008.11.009
  19. Kim G, 2012, J DIGIT IMAGING, V25, P486, DOI 10.1007/s10278-012-9458-6
  20. Koshima I, 2005, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V116, P1091, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000178794.11828.49
  21. Kuroda Y, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P8639, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0911647107
  22. LI LT, 2011, IFATS MIAM 2011 9 AN
  23. LONGAKER MT, 1995, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V96, P800, DOI 10.1097/00006534-199509001-00006
  24. Longaker MT, 1996, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V98, P942, DOI 10.1097/00006534-199611000-00003
  25. Masuda T, 2004, TISSUE ENG, V10, P1672, DOI 10.1089/ten.2004.10.1672
  26. Matsumoto D, 2006, TISSUE ENG, V12, P3375, DOI 10.1089/ten.2006.12.3375
  27. Mojallal A, 2009, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V124, P471, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181af023a
  28. Moseley TA, 2006, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V118, p121S, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000234609.74811.2e
  29. Padoin AV, 2008, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V122, P614, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817d5476
  30. Rohrich RJ, 2011, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V127, p3S, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820c2421
  31. Rubio D, 2005, CANCER RES, V65, P3035
  32. Saadeh Pierre B, 2008, Plast Reconstr Surg, V121, p368e, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181707194
  33. Spalding KL, 2008, NATURE, V453, P783, DOI 10.1038/nature06902
  34. Suga H, 2008, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V122, P103, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817742ed
  35. Suga H, 2009, STEM CELLS, V27, P238, DOI 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0261
  36. Tabit CJ, 2012, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V36, P704, DOI 10.1007/s00266-011-9835-4
  37. Tanna N, 2011, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V127, P802, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181fed6e4
  38. Tiryaki T, 2011, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V35, P965, DOI 10.1007/s00266-011-9716-x
  39. Yoshimura K, 2010, BREAST J, V16, P169, DOI 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00873.x
  40. Yoshimura K, 2008, DERMATOL SURG, V34, P1178, DOI 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34256.x
  41. YOSHIMURA K, 2005, IFATS 2005 3 ANN S A
  42. Yoshimura K, 2009, REGEN MED, V4, P265, DOI 10.2217/17460751.4.2.265
  43. Yoshimura K, 2008, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V32, P48, DOI 10.1007/s00266-007-9019-4
  44. Zhang SJ, 2010, CHEM-BIOL INTERACT, V188, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.cbi.2010.06.008
  45. Zhu M, 2010, ANN PLAS SURG, V64, P222, DOI 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31819ae05c