Surgical treatment: Robotic simple prostatectomy
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
bookPart
Data de publicação
2017
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING
Autores
Citação
De Carvalho, P. A.; Coelho, R. F.. Surgical treatment: Robotic simple prostatectomy. In: . THE BIG PROSTATE: SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING, 2017. p.129-142.
Resumo
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men; the treatment options for this condition have improved in the latest years but LUTS caused by very large prostatic adenoma (>100 g) remains a challenge. Currently, the field of medicine is increasingly incorporating technologies in their clinical practice in order to minimize the surgical invasion, aiming to improve outcomes and decrease complication rates. In sequence, we will describe the main steps of transperitoneal robotic assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP), tips and tricks based on our personal experience and will discuss the main data available in the literature about the topic. © Springer International Publishing AG 2018.
Palavras-chave
Benign prostatic hyperplasia, Bladder outlet obstruction and lower urinary tract symptoms, Large-prostate (>100 g), Open simple prostatectomy, Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy
Referências
- Wei, J.T., Calhoun, E., Jacobsen, S.J., Urologic diseases in America project: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (2008) J Urol, 179, pp. S75-S80
- Irwin, D.E., Kopp, Z.S., Agatep, B., Milsom, I., Abrams, P., Worldwide prevalence estimates of lower urinary tract symptoms, overactive bladder, urinary incontinence and bladder outlet obstruction (2011) BJU Int, 108, pp. 1132-1138
- Kupelian, V., Fitzgerald, M.P., Kaplan, S.A., Norgaard, J.P., Chiu, G.R., Rosen, R.C., Association of nocturia and mortality: Results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2011) J Urol, 185, pp. 571-577
- Groves, H.K., Chang, D., Palazzi, K., Cohen, S., Parsons, J.K., The incidence of acute urinary retention secondary to BPH is increasing among California men (2013) Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 16, pp. 260-265
- McVary, K.T., Roehrborn, C.G., Avins, A.L., Barry, M.J., Bruskewitz, R.C., Donnell, R.F., Update on AUA guideline on the management of the benign prostatic hyperplasia (2011) J Urol, 185, pp. 1793-1803
- Oelke, M., Bachmann, A., Descazeaud, A., Emberton, M., Gravas, S., Michel, M.C., EAU guidelines on treatment and follow-up of the non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction (2013) Eur Urol, 63, pp. 118-140
- Freyer, P.J., One thousand cases of total enucleation of the prostate for radical cure of enlargement of that organ (1912) Br Med J, 2, pp. 868-870
- Millin, R., Retropubic prostatectomy: New extravesical technique: Report on 20 cases (1945) Lancet, 2, pp. 693-696
- Serretta, V., Morgia, G., Fondacaro, L., Curto, G., Lo Bianco, A., Pirritano, D., Open prostatectomy for benign prostatic enlargement in Southern Europe in the late 1900s: A contemporary series of the 1800 interventions (2002) Urology, 60 (4), pp. 623-627
- Gratzke, C., Schlenker, B., Seitz, M., Karl, A., Hermanek, P., Lack, N., Complications and early postoperative outcome after open prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic enlargement: Results of a prospective multicenter study (2007) J Urol, 177 (4), pp. 1419-1422
- Suer, E., Gokce, I., Yaman, O., Anafarta, K., Göğüş, O., Open prostatectomy is still a valid option for the large prostates: A high-volume, single-center experience (2008) Urology, 72 (1), pp. 90-94
- Mariano, M.B., Graziottin, T.M., Tefilli, M.V., Laparoscopic prostatectomy with vascular control for benign prostatic hyperplasia (2002) J Urol, 167, pp. 2528-2529
- Sotelo, R., Clavijo, R., Carmona, O., Garcia, A., Banda, E., Miranda, M., Robotic simple prostatectomy (2008) J Urol, 179, pp. 513-515
- Parsons, J.K., Patel, N.D., Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: Is there evidence to go beyond the experimental stage? (2014) Curr Urol Rep., 15, pp. 443-447
- Patel, M.N., Hemal, A.K., Robot-assisted laparoscopic simple anatomic prostatectomy (2014) Urol Clin North Am, 41 (4), pp. 485-492
- Coelho, R.F., Chauhan, S., Sivaraman, A., Palmer, K.J., Orvieto, M.A., Rocco, B., Modified technique of robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: Advantages of a vesico-urethral anastomosis (2011) BJUI, 109, pp. 426-433
- Sutherland, D.E., Perez, D.S., Weeks, D.C., Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for severe benign prostatic hyperplasia (2011) J Endourol, 25, pp. 641-644
- Banapour, P., Patel, N., Kane, C.J., Cohen, S.A., Parsons, J.K., Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: A systematic review and report of a single institution case series (2014) Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 17, pp. 1-5
- Leslie, S., Abreu, A.L., Chopra, S., Ramos, P., Park, D., Berger, A.K., Transvesical robotic simple prostatectomy: Initial clinical experience (2014) Eur Urol, 66 (2), pp. 321-329
- Dubey, D., Hemal, A.K., Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy with complete urethrovesical reconstruction (2012) Indian J Urol, 28 (2), pp. 231-232
- Lucca, I.H., Shariat, S., Hofbauer, S., Klatte, T., Outcomes of minimally invasive simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2015) World J Urol, 33, pp. 563-570
- Abboudi, H., Khan, M.S., Guru, K.A., Froghi, S., de Win, G., Van Poppel, H., Learning curves for urological procedures: A systematic review (2013) BJU Int, 114 (4), pp. 617-629
- Pokorny, M., Novara, G., Geurts, N., Dovey, Z., Groote, R., Ploumidis, A., Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic enlargement: Surgical technique and outcomes in a high-volume robotic centre (2015) Eur Urol, 68, pp. 451-457
- Yuh, B., Laungani, R., Perlmutter, A., Eun, D., Peabody, J.O., Mohler, J.L., Robot-assisted Millin’s retropubic prostatectomy: Case series (2008) Can J Urol, 15, pp. 4101-4105
- Holden, M., Parsons, J.K., Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: An overview (2016) Urol Clin North Am, 43 (3), pp. 385-391
- Parsons, J.K., Rangarajan, S., Palazzi, K., Chang, D., A national, comparative analysis of perioeperative outcomes of open and minimally invasive simple prostatectomy (2015) J Endourol, 29, pp. 919-924
- Autorino, R., Zargar, H., Mariano, M.B., Sanchez-Salas, R., Sotelo, R., Chlosta, P.L., Perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic simple prostatectomy: A European-American Multi-institucional analysis (2015) Eur Urol, 68, pp. 86-94
- Martin, R.C., 2nd, Brennan, M.F., Jaques, D.P., Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature (2002) Ann Surg, 235, pp. 803-813
- Porpiglia, F., Terrone, C., Renard, J., Grande, S., Musso, F., Cossu, M., Transcapsular adenomectomy (Millin): A comparative study, extraperitoneal laparoscopy versus open surgery (2006) Eur Urol, 49 (1), pp. 120-126
- McCullough, T.C., Heldwein, F.L., Soon, S.J., Galiano, M., Barret, E., Cathelineau, X., Laparoscopic versus open simple prostatectomy: An evaluation of morbidity (2009) J Endourol, 23 (1), pp. 129-133
- Baumert, H., Ballaro, A., Dugardin, F., Kaisary, A.V., Laparoscopic versus open simple prostatectomy: A comparative study (2006) J Urol, 175 (5), pp. 1691-1694
- Garcia-Segui, A., Gascón-Mir, M., Comparative study between laparoscopic extraperitoneal and open adenomectomy (2012) Actas Urol Esp, 36 (2), pp. 110-116
- Umari, P., Fossati, N., Gandaglia, G., Pokorny, M., Groot, R.D., Geurts, N., Robotic Assisted Simple Prostatectomy (RASP) versus Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) for lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with large prostate (>100mL): A comparative analysis from a high-volume center (2016) J Urol, 197 (4), pp. 1108-1114
- Ahmed, K., Ibrahim, A., Wang, T.T., Khan, N., Challacombe, B., Khan, M.S., Assessing the cost effectiveness of robotics in urological surgery-a systematic review (2012) BJU Int, 110, pp. 1544-1556
- Matei, D.V., Brascia, A., Mazzoleni, F., Spinelli, M., Musi, G., Melegari, S., Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP): Does it make sense? (2012) BJU Int., 110, pp. E972-E979