Bipolar I and bipolar II subtypes in older age: Results from the Global Aging and Geriatric Experiments in Bipolar Disorder (GAGE-BD) project

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
4
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
WILEY
Autores
BEUNDERS, Alexandra J. M.
KLAUS, Federica
KOK, Almar A. L.
SCHOUWS, Sigfried N. T. M.
KUPKA, Ralph W.
BLUMBERG, Hilary P.
BRIGGS, Farren
EYLER, Lisa T.
FORESTER, Brent P.
Citação
BIPOLAR DISORDERS, v.25, n.1, p.43-55, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objectives: The distinction between bipolar I disorder (BD-I) and bipolar II disorder (BD-II) has been a topic of long-lasting debate. This study examined differences between BD-I and BD-II in a large, global sample of OABD, focusing on general functioning, cognition and somatic burden as these domains are often affected in OABD. Methods: Cross-sectional analyses were conducted with data from the Global Aging and Geriatric Experiments in Bipolar Disorder (GAGE-BD) database. The sample included 963 participants aged >= 50 years (714 BD-I, 249 BD-II). Sociodemographic and clinical factors were compared between BD subtypes including adjustment for study cohort. Multivariable analyses were conducted with generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) and estimated associations between BD subtype and (1) general functioning (GAF), (2) cognitive performance (g-score) and (3) somatic burden, with study cohort as random intercept. Results: After adjustment for study cohort, BD-II patients more often had a late onset >= 50 years (p = 0.008) and more current severe depression (p = 0.041). BD-I patients were more likely to have a history of psychiatric hospitalization (p < 0.001) and current use of anti-psychotics (p = 0.003). Multivariable analyses showed that BD subtype was not related to GAF, cognitive g-score or somatic burden. Conclusion: BD-I and BD-II patients did not differ in terms of general functioning, cognitive impairment or somatic burden. Some clinical differences were observed between the groups, which could be the consequence of diagnostic definitions. The distinction between BD-I and BD-II is not the best way to subtype OABD patients. Future research should investigate other disease specifiers in this population.
Palavras-chave
bipolar disorder, cognition, comorbidities, diagnostic subtypes, elderly, functioning, geriatrics, impairment, older-age bipolar disorder (OABD), psychiatry
Referências
  1. Amann BL, 2017, BIPOLAR DISORD, V19, P225, DOI 10.1111/bdi.12495
  2. [Anonymous], 2013, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI [10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787, DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787, 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596]
  3. Baek JH, 2011, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V131, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2010.11.020
  4. Bora E, 2018, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V229, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2017.12.057
  5. Burdick KE, 2019, BIPOLAR DISORD, V21, P6, DOI 10.1111/bdi.12748
  6. Chaudhry S, 2005, MED CARE, V43, P607, DOI 10.1097/01.mlr.0000163658.65008.ec
  7. Dell'Osso B, 2020, INT CLIN PSYCHOPHARM, V35, P8, DOI 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000282
  8. Dell'Osso B, 2016, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V201, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2016.04.009
  9. Dell'Osso B, 2015, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V188, P257, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.001
  10. Dols A, 2014, AM J GERIAT PSYCHIAT, V22, P1066, DOI 10.1016/j.jagp.2013.12.176
  11. First M., 2002, STRUCTURED CLIN INTE
  12. Fornaro M, 2016, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V195, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.040
  13. Forty L, 2014, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V205, P465, DOI 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.152249
  14. Guzman-Parra J, 2021, TRANSL PSYCHIAT, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41398-020-01146-0
  15. HAMILTON M, 1960, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V23, P56, DOI 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56
  16. Johnson W, 2004, INTELLIGENCE, V32, P95, DOI 10.1016/S0160-2896(03)00062-X
  17. Judd LL, 2003, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V73, P123, DOI 10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00332-4
  18. Karanti A, 2020, BIPOLAR DISORD, V22, P392, DOI 10.1111/bdi.12867
  19. Kessing LV, 2021, EUR NEUROPSYCHOPHARM, V47, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.01.097
  20. LINN BS, 1968, J AM GERIATR SOC, V16, P622, DOI 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1968.tb02103.x
  21. Maina G, 2007, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V68, P207, DOI 10.4088/JCP.v68n0205
  22. Malhi GS, 2021, AUST NZ J PSYCHIAT, V55, P536, DOI 10.1177/00048674211022602
  23. Martino DJ, 2018, PSYCHIAT RES, V262, P510, DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.09.035
  24. Merikangas KR, 2012, CURR OPIN PSYCHIATR, V25, P19, DOI 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32834de3de
  25. MILLER MD, 1992, PSYCHIAT RES, V41, P237, DOI 10.1016/0165-1781(92)90005-N
  26. Miskowiak KW, 2021, EUR NEUROPSYCHOPHARM, V46, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.03.017
  27. Montejo L, 2022, BIPOLAR DISORD, V24, P115, DOI 10.1111/bdi.13175
  28. Montejo L, 2022, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V298, P522, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2021.11.028
  29. MONTGOMERY SA, 1979, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V134, P382, DOI 10.1192/bjp.134.4.382
  30. Murri MB, 2019, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V257, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2019.07.052
  31. Nivoli AMA, 2014, ACTA PSYCHIAT SCAND, V130, P364, DOI 10.1111/acps.12272
  32. Pallaskorpi S, 2019, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V246, P806, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.093
  33. Parker G, 2021, AUST NZ J PSYCHIAT, V55, P548, DOI 10.1177/00048674211020095
  34. Parker G, 2021, PSYCHIAT RES, V297, DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113719
  35. Parker G, 2020, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V277, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.014
  36. Parker G, 2013, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V148, P202, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.061
  37. Pavlova B, 2015, LANCET PSYCHIAT, V2, P710, DOI 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00112-1
  38. Plans L, 2019, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V257, P340, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2019.07.048
  39. RADLOFF L S, 1977, Applied Psychological Measurement, V1, P385, DOI 10.1177/014662167700100306
  40. Rosa AR, 2010, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V127, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2010.05.014
  41. Sajatovic M, 2022, BIPOLAR DISORD, V24, P195, DOI 10.1111/bdi.13119
  42. Sajatovic M, 2019, BIPOLAR DISORD, V21, P642, DOI 10.1111/bdi.12795
  43. Sajatovic M, 2015, BIPOLAR DISORD, V17, P689, DOI 10.1111/bdi.12331
  44. Sheehan DV, 1998, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V59, P22, DOI 10.4088/JCP.09m05305whi
  45. Song J, 2018, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V84, P810, DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.11.014
  46. Spitzer RL., 1996, OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT, P76
  47. Vieta E, 1997, COMPR PSYCHIAT, V38, P98, DOI 10.1016/S0010-440X(97)90088-2
  48. Vieta E, 2021, EUR NEUROPSYCHOPHARM, V47, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.03.008
  49. Vinberg M, 2017, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V208, P521, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2016.10.031
  50. YOUNG RC, 1978, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V133, P429, DOI 10.1192/bjp.133.5.429