Prevalence and significance of antimitochondrial antibodies in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH): Results from a large multicentre study of the International AIH Group

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
2
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ELSEVIER
Autores
GATSELIS, Nikolaos K.
ZACHOU, Kalliopi
LOZA, Aldo J. Montano
ARINAGA-HINO, Teruko
MURATORI, Paolo
EFE, Cumali
FLOREANI, Annarosa
INVERNIZZI, Pietro
TAKAHASHI, Athushi
Citação
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, v.116, p.43-50, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background & Aims: Antimitochondrial antibodies (AMA) are specific markers for the diagnosis of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) but can also be found occasionally in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). The present large multicentre cohort study assessed the prevalence and significance of AMA in AIH-patients. Methods: 123 AMA-positive AIH-patients were investigated and compared with 711 age-matched AMA-negative AIH-patients and 69 patients with AIH/PBC variant. Results: AMA prevalence in AIH-patients was 5.1% (range: 1.2%-11.8%). AMA-positivity was associated with female sex (p = 0.031) in AMA-positive AIH-patients but not with liver biochemistry, bile duct injury on liver biopsy, disease severity at baseline and response to treatment compared to AMA-negative AIH-patients. Comparing AMA-positive AIH-patients to those with AIH/PBC variant, there was no difference in disease severity. Regarding liver histology, AIH/PBC variant patients were characterized by the presence of at least one feature of bile duct damage (p<0.001). Response to immunosuppressive treatment was similar among groups. From AMA-positive AIH patients only those with evidence of non-specific bile duct injury had higher risk to progress to cirrhosis (HR=4.314, 95%CI: 2.348-7.928; p<0.001). During follow-up, AMA-positive AIH-patients had higher risk to develop histological bile duct injury (HR 4.654, 95%CI 1.829-11.840; p = 0.001). Conclusions: AMA presence is relatively common among AIH-patients, but their clinical significance seems important only when they co-exist with non-specific bile duct injury at the histological level. Therefore, a careful evaluation of liver biopsy seems of utmost importance in these patients.
Palavras-chave
Autoimmune hepatitis, Primary biliary cholangitis, Autoantibodies, Autoimmune hepatitis/primary biliary, cholangitis variant syndrome, Antimitochondrial antibodies, Outcome
Referências
  1. Alvarez E, 1999, J HEPATOL, V31, P929, DOI 10.1016/S0168-8278(99)80297-9
  2. Chazouillères O, 1998, HEPATOLOGY, V28, P296, DOI 10.1002/hep.510280203
  3. Czaja AJ, 2004, LIVER INT, V24, P322, DOI 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2004.0924.x
  4. Czaja AJ, 1998, HEPATOLOGY, V28, P360, DOI 10.1002/hep.510280210
  5. Czaja AJ, 2001, HEPATOLOGY, V34, P659, DOI 10.1053/jhep.2001.27562
  6. Dahlqvist G, 2017, HEPATOLOGY, V65, P152, DOI 10.1002/hep.28859
  7. Dalekos GN, 2022, JHEP REP, V4, DOI 10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100601
  8. Dalekos GN, 2023, EUR J INTERN MED, V108, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.ejim.2022.11.013
  9. Dalekos GN, 2022, FRONT IMMUNOL, V12, DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2021.798602
  10. Dalekos GN, 2021, LIVER INT, V41, P1592, DOI 10.1111/liv.14900
  11. Dalekos GN, 2019, ARCH IMMUNOL THER EX, V67, P197, DOI 10.1007/s00005-019-00550-9
  12. Dalekos GN, 2019, ANN GASTROENTEROL, V32, P1, DOI 10.20524/aog.2018.0330
  13. de Boer YS, 2015, HISTOPATHOLOGY, V66, P351, DOI 10.1111/his.12558
  14. Dinani AM, 2012, CLIN GASTROENTEROL H, V10, P682, DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.02.010
  15. Gatselis NK, 2017, EUR J INTERN MED, V42, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.ejim.2017.05.006
  16. Gatselis NK, 2016, EXPERT REV MOL DIAGN, V16, P1001, DOI 10.1080/14737159.2016.1217159
  17. Gatselis NK, 2013, AUTOIMMUNITY, V46, P471, DOI 10.3109/08916934.2013.801461
  18. Hennes EM, 2008, HEPATOLOGY, V48, P169, DOI 10.1002/hep.22322
  19. Hirschfield GM, 2017, J HEPATOL, V67, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.03.022
  20. Liu HY, 2010, J AUTOIMMUN, V35, P436, DOI 10.1016/j.jaut.2010.09.005
  21. Lohse AW, 2015, J HEPATOL, V63, P971, DOI 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.06.030
  22. Mack CL, 2020, HEPATOLOGY, V72, P671, DOI 10.1002/hep.31065
  23. Montano-Loza AJ, 2008, J CLIN GASTROENTEROL, V42, P1047, DOI 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181587d18
  24. Muratori P, 2017, EUR J GASTROEN HEPAT, V29, P777, DOI 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000870
  25. Nezu S, 2006, J GASTROEN HEPATOL, V21, P1448, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04434.x
  26. O'Brien C, 2008, HEPATOLOGY, V48, P550, DOI 10.1002/hep.22380
  27. Pape S, 2022, J HEPATOL, V76, P841, DOI 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.12.041
  28. Sun CY, 2019, J AUTOIMMUN, V99, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.jaut.2019.01.005
  29. Tiniakos DG, 2015, DIGEST DIS, V33, P53, DOI 10.1159/000440747
  30. Zachou K, 2016, ALIMENT PHARM THER, V43, P1035, DOI 10.1111/apt.13584
  31. Zachou K, 2020, LIVER INT, V40, P368, DOI 10.1111/liv.14280
  32. Zachou K, 2017, EUR J INTERN MED, V38, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.ejim.2017.01.007
  33. Zachou K, 2015, LIVER INT, V35, P660, DOI 10.1111/liv.12658