CONSTIPATION SCORING SYSTEM VALIDATED FOR THE PORTUGUESE LANGUAGE (<i>ÍNDICE DE GRAVIDADE DA CONSTIPAÇÃO INTESTINAL</i>): IS IT RELIABLE IN ASSESSING THE SEVERITY OF INTESTINAL CHRONIC CONSTIPATION IN OUR POPULATION?

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Dimensions
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
COLEGIO BRASILEIRO CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA-CBCD
Autores
SANTOS, Vera Lucia Conceicao de Gouveia
Citação
ABCD-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA-BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY, v.36, article ID e1785, 9p, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of valid and specific tools to measure chronic constipation severity in Brazil. AIMS: To validate the Constipation Scoring System for Brazilian spoken Portuguese. METHODS: Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation itself (reliability and convergent and divergent validation). Translation: definitive version from the original version's translation and evaluation by specialists. Cultural adaptation: score content analysis of the definitive version, as an interview to patients. Interobserver reliability: application by two researchers on the same day. Intraobserver reliability: same researcher at different times, in a 7-day interval. Divergent validation: non-constipated volunteers. Convergent validation: two groups, good response to clinical treatment and refractory to treatment. RESULTS: Cultural adaptation: 81 patients, 89% female, with mean age of 55 and seven years of schooling, and overall content validity index was 96.5%. Inter and intraobserver reliability analysis: 60 patients, 86.7% female, mean age of 56 and six years of schooling, and the respective intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.991 and 0.987, p<0.001. Divergent validation: 40 volunteers, 25 male, mean age of 49 years, and the mean global score was 2. Convergent validation of patients with good response to clinical treatment: 47 patients, 39 female, mean age of 60 and six years of schooling, and the pre- and post-treatment scores were 19 and 8, respectively (p<0.001). Convergent validation of refractory to clinical treatment patients: 75 patients, 70 female, mean age of 53 and seven years of schooling, and the global average score was 22. CONCLUSIONS: The Constipation Scoring System (indice de Gravidade da Constipacao Intestinal) validated for the Brazilian population is a reliable instrument for measuring the severity of intestinal chronic constipation.
Palavras-chave
Constipation, Validation Study, Indicators of Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/58887
Referências
  1. Agachan F, 1996, DIS COLON RECTUM, V39, P681, DOI 10.1007/BF02056950
  2. Altomare DF, 2008, COLORECTAL DIS, V10, P84, DOI 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01262.x
  3. Beaton DE, 2000, SPINE, V25, P3186, DOI 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
  4. Bharucha AE, 2020, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V158, P1232, DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.034
  5. BOYLAN RT, 1992, J ECON THEORY, V57, P473, DOI 10.1016/0022-0531(92)90046-K
  6. Coffin B, 2011, EXPERT REV GASTROENT, V5, P601, DOI [10.1586/EGH.11.53, 10.1586/egh.11.53]
  7. Collete VL, 2010, CAD SAUDE PUBLICA, V26, P1391, DOI 10.1590/S0102-311X2010000700018
  8. Digesu GA, 2010, INT UROGYNECOL J, V21, P1185, DOI 10.1007/s00192-010-1179-0
  9. Drossman Douglas A, 2006, J Gastrointestin Liver Dis, V15, P237
  10. Drossman DA, 2016, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V150, P1257, DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.03.035
  11. Ducrotté P, 2012, CURR MED RES OPIN, V28, P457, DOI 10.1185/03007995.2012.657301
  12. Falcao DD, 2003, J RHEUMATOL, V30, P379
  13. Frank L, 1999, SCAND J GASTROENTERO, V34, P870, DOI 10.1080/003655299750025327
  14. Garrigues V, 2004, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V159, P520, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwh072
  15. GUILLEMIN F, 1993, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V46, P1417, DOI 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N
  16. Johanson JF, 2007, ALIMENT PHARM THER, V25, P599, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03238.x
  17. Kalil FA, 2021, ABCD-ARQ BRAS CIR DI, V34, DOI 10.1590/0102-672020210002e1583
  18. Knowles CH, 2000, DIS COLON RECTUM, V43, P1419, DOI 10.1007/BF02236639
  19. Kokke FT, 2010, PEDIATR RADIOL, V40, P1789, DOI 10.1007/s00247-010-1725-4
  20. Koo TK, 2016, J CHIROPR MED, V15, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
  21. Krogh K, 2006, SPINAL CORD, V44, P625, DOI 10.1038/sj.sc.3101887
  22. Lakshminarayanan B, 2008, PEDIATR SURG INT, V24, P1379, DOI 10.1007/s00383-008-2268-8
  23. Leung L, 2011, J AM BOARD FAM MED, V24, P436, DOI 10.3122/jabfm.2011.04.100272
  24. Luis HPS., 2012, Adolescencia Saude, V9, P7
  25. MCMILLAN SC, 1989, CANCER NURS, V12, P183, DOI 10.1097/00002820-198906000-00012
  26. MCSHANE RE, 1985, NURS CLIN N AM, V20, P801
  27. Meira JD, 2022, ABCD-ARQ BRAS CIR DI, V35, DOI 10.1590/0102-672020220002e1718
  28. Pannemans J, 2020, NEUROGASTROENT MOTIL, V32, DOI 10.1111/nmo.13783
  29. PEMBERTON JH, 1991, ANN SURG, V214, P403, DOI 10.1097/00000658-199110000-00005
  30. Schmidt FMQ, 2016, GASTROENTEROL NURS, V39, P204, DOI 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000224
  31. Slappendel R, 2006, EUR J PAIN, V10, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.03.008
  32. Travaglio E, 2014, ANN ITAL CHIR, V85, P287
  33. Tsunoda A, 2016, SURG TODAY, V46, P414, DOI 10.1007/s00595-015-1179-2
  34. Woolery Myra, 2006, J Pediatr Oncol Nurs, V23, P65, DOI 10.1177/1043454205285874
  35. Yusuf Sonia Ahlaim Ibrahim, 2004, Arq. Gastroenterol., V41, P202, DOI 10.1590/S0004-28032004000300013

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MGT