Exercise Capacity and Mortality in Patients With Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction Randomized to Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery or Medical Therapy An Analysis From the STICH Trial (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure)

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
40
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2014
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Autores
STEWART, Ralph A. H.
SZALEWSKA, Dominika
SHE, Lilin
LEE, Kerry L.
DRAZNER, Mark H.
LUBISZEWSKA, Barbara
KOSEVIC, Dragana
RUENGSAKULRACH, Permyos
COUTU, Benoit
Citação
JACC-HEART FAILURE, v.2, n.4, p.335-343, 2014
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of exercise capacity in patients with ischemic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction eligible for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). BACKGROUND Poor exercise capacity is associated with mortality, but it is not known how this influences the benefits and risks of CABG compared with medical therapy. METHODS In an exploratory analysis, physical activity was assessed by questionnaire and 6-min walk test in 1,212 patients before randomization to CABG (n = 610) or medical management (n = 602) in the STICH (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure) trial. Mortality (n = 462) was compared by treatment allocation during 56 months (interquartile range: 48 to 68 months) of follow-up for subjects able (n = 682) and unable (n = 530) to walk 300 m in 6 min and with less (Physical Ability Score [PAS] >55, n = 749) and more (PAS <= 55, n = 433) limitation by dyspnea or fatigue. RESULTS Compared with medical therapy, mortality was lower for patients randomized to CABG who walked >= 300 m (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59 to 0.99; p = 0.038) and those with a PAS >55 (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.01; p = 0.061). Patients unable to walk 300 m or with a PAS <= 55 had higher mortality during the first 60 days with CABG (HR: 3.24; 95% CI: 1.64 to 6.83; p = 0.002) and no significant benefit from CABG during total follow-up (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.75 to 1.19; p = 0.626; interaction p = 0.167). CONCLUSIONS These observations suggest that patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction and poor exercise capacity have increased early risk and similar 5-year mortality with CABG compared with medical therapy, whereas those with better exercise capacity have improved survival with CABG. (Comparison of Surgical and Medical Treatment for Congestive Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease [STICH]; NCT00023595) (C) 2014 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
Palavras-chave
coronary disease, heart failure, surgery, trials
Referências
  1. Studenski S, 2011, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V305, P50, DOI 10.1001/jama.2010.1923
  2. Panza JA, 2013, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V61, P1860, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.014
  3. Zuluaga MC, 2010, EUR J HEART FAIL, V12, P1372, DOI 10.1093/eurjhf/hfq163
  4. Ingle L, 2007, EUR HEART J, V28, P560, DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl527
  5. Shahian DM, 2009, ANN THORAC SURG, V88, pS2, DOI 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.053
  6. Rostagno C, 2003, EUR J HEART FAIL, V5, P247, DOI 10.1016/S1388-9842(02)00244-1
  7. Afilalo J, 2012, CIRC-CARDIOVASC QUAL, V5, P222, DOI 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.963157
  8. Montalescot G, 2013, EUR HEART J, V34, P2949, DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/eht296
  9. Mommersteeg PMC, 2009, AM HEART J, V157, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.09.020
  10. Forman DE, 2012, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V60, P2653, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.1010
  11. Koch CG, 2007, CIRCULATION, V115, P692, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.640573
  12. Chamberlain AM, 2013, CIRC-HEART FAIL, V6, P669, DOI 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.000291
  13. Jones RH, 2010, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V56, P490, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.102
  14. Guazzi M, 2009, CIRC-HEART FAIL, V2, P549, DOI 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.109.881326
  15. Matsuzawa Y, 2013, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V61, P1964, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.020
  16. Velazquez EJ, 2011, NEW ENGL J MED, V364, P1607, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1100356
  17. Roul G, 1998, AM HEART J, V136, P449, DOI 10.1016/S0002-8703(98)70219-4
  18. Fihn SD, 2012, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V60, pE44, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.013
  19. Newman AB, 2006, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V295, P2018, DOI 10.1001/jama.295.17.2018
  20. Stewart R, 2013, EUR HEART J, V34, P3286, DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/eht258
  21. Green CP, 2000, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V35, P1245, DOI 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00531-3
  22. Bonow RO, 2011, NEW ENGL J MED, V364, P1617, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1100358
  23. BITTNER V, 1993, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V270, P1702, DOI 10.1001/jama.270.14.1702
  24. EuroQol Group, 1990, HLTH POLICY, V16, P199, DOI 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9
  25. EuroSCORE Web site, NEW EUROSCORE 2 INT
  26. Society of Thoracic Surgeons, STS RISK CALC