Meta-analysis of Vascular Imaging Features to Predict Outcome Following Intravenous rtPA for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
18
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2016
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
Autores
SAEED, Nazia P.
PANERAI, Ronney B.
ROBINSON, Thompson G.
Citação
FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, v.7, article ID 77, 8p, 2016
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background: The present review investigated which findings in vascular imaging techniques can be used to predict clinical outcome and the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) in patients who underwent intravenous thrombolytic treatment. Methods: Publications were searched, and the inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) published manuscripts, (2) patients with acute ischemic stroke managed with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA), and (3) availability of imaging assessment to determine vessel patency or the regulation of cerebral blood flow prior to, during, and/or after thrombolytic treatment. Clinical outcomes were divided into neurological outcome [National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) within 7 days] and functional outcome (modified Rankin score in 2-3 months). sICH was defined as rtPA-related intracerebral bleeding associated with any worsening of NIHSS. Results: Thirty-nine articles were selected. Recanalization was associated with improved neurological and functional outcomes (OR = 7.83; 95% CI, 3.71-16.53; p < 0.001 and OR = 11.12; 95% CI, 5.85-21.14; p < 0.001, respectively). Both tandem internal carotid artery/middle cerebral artery (ICA/MCA) occlusions and isolated ICA occlusion had worse functional outcome than isolated MCA occlusion (OR = 0.26, 95% CI, 0.12-0.52; p < 0.001 and OR = 0.24, 95% CI, 0.07-0.77; p = 0.016, respectively). Reocclusion was associated with neurological deterioration (OR = 6.48, 95% CI, 3.64-11.56; p < 0.001), and early recanalization was associated with lower odds of sICH (OR = 0.36, 95% CI, 0.18-0.70; p = 0.003). Conclusion: Brain circulation data before, during, and after thrombolysis may be useful for predicting the clinical outcome. Cerebral arterial recanalization, presence and site of occlusion, and reocclusion are all important in predicting the clinical outcome.
Palavras-chave
ischemic stroke, clinical outcome, intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral hemodynamics, intracranial circulation, cerebral autoregulation, rtPA
Referências
  1. Saqqur M, 2009, CEREBROVASC DIS, V27, P5, DOI 10.1159/000172628
  2. Mishra NK, 2010, STROKE, V41, pE25, DOI 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.566869
  3. Nighoghossian N, 2003, STROKE, V34, P458, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.000053850.64877.AF
  4. Tsivgoulis G, 2007, STROKE, V38, P961, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000257314.74853.2b
  5. Burgin WS, 2000, STROKE, V31, P1128
  6. Alexandrov AV, 2001, CIRCULATION, V103, P2897
  7. El-Mitwalli A, 2002, STROKE, V33, P99, DOI 10.1161/hs0102.101892
  8. Alexandrov AV, 2000, STROKE, V31, P610
  9. Schellinger PD, 2003, STROKE, V34, P575, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000051504.10095.9C
  10. Felberg RA, 2002, STROKE, V33, P1301, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000015556.48283.74
  11. Labiche LA, 2003, J NEUROIMAGING, V13, P28, DOI 10.1177/1051228402239714
  12. Molina CA, 2004, STROKE, V35, P486, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000110219.67054.BF
  13. Derex L, 2004, J NEUROL SCI, V225, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.jns.2004.05.020
  14. Christou I, 2002, J NEUROIMAGING, V12, P119
  15. Molina CA, 2004, STROKE, V35, P151, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000106485.04500.4A
  16. Reinhard M, 2005, STROKE, V36, P1684, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000173183.36331.ee
  17. Rha JH, 2007, STROKE, V38, P967, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000258112.14918.24
  18. Molina CA, 2002, STROKE, V33, P1551, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000016323.13456.E5
  19. Rubiera M, 2006, STROKE, V37, P2301, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000237070.80133.1d
  20. Ribo M, 2006, STROKE, V37, P1000, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000206443.96112.d9
  21. Reinhard M, 2008, CEREBROVASC DIS, V26, P147, DOI 10.1159/000139662
  22. Sillanpaa N, 2012, NEURORADIOLOGY, V54, P663, DOI 10.1007/s00234-011-0954-z
  23. Rother J, 2002, STROKE, V33, P2438, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000030109.12281.23
  24. Alexandrov AV, 2004, J NEUROIMAGING, V14, P113, DOI 10.1177/1051228403261462
  25. Molina CA, 2001, STROKE, V32, P2821, DOI 10.1161/hs1201.99821
  26. Christou I, 2000, STROKE, V31, P1812
  27. Barber PA, 2000, LANCET, V355, P1670, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02237-6
  28. Saqqur M, 2008, NEUROLOGY, V71, P1304, DOI 10.1212/01.wnl.0000313936.15842.0d
  29. Delgado-Mederos R, 2007, STROKE, V38, P955, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000257977.32525.6e
  30. Ishrat T, 2012, CURR PHARM DESIGN, V18, P3677
  31. Reinhard M, 2012, ACTA NEUROL SCAND, V125, P156, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2011.01515.x
  32. Linfante I, 2002, STROKE, V33, P2066, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000021001.18101.A5
  33. Pialat JB, 2005, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V22, P23, DOI 10.1002/jmri.20363
  34. Olivot JM, 2008, STROKE, V39, P2257, DOI 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.511535
  35. Huang YN, 2015, INT J STROKE, V10, P778, DOI 10.1111/ijs.12486
  36. Alexandrov AV, 2002, NEUROLOGY, V59, P862
  37. Sims JR, 2005, AM J NEURORADIOL, V26, P246
  38. Butcher K, 2003, STROKE, V34, P2159, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000086529.83878.A2
  39. Aviv RI, 2007, AM J NEURORADIOL, V28, P1975, DOI 10.3174/ajnr.A0689
  40. Olivot JM, 2009, STROKE, V40, P3245, DOI 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.558635
  41. Perilla ASP, 2013, NEUROL CLIN, V31, P677, DOI 10.1016/j.ncl.2013.03.006
  42. Kimura K, 2009, EUR NEUROL, V62, P287, DOI 10.1159/000235753
  43. Delgado-Mederos R, 2008, NEUROLOGY, V71, P552, DOI 10.1212/01.wnl.0000318294.36223.69
  44. Saqqur M, 2007, STROKE, V38, P69, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000251800.01964.f6
  45. Kim YS, 2005, STROKE, V36, P869, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000160007.57787.4c
  46. Thomassen L, 2005, EUR J NEUROL, V12, P462, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2005.01008.x
  47. Saqqur M, 2007, STROKE, V38, P948, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000257304.21967.ba
  48. Salinet ASM, 2013, J NEUROL, V260, P2588, DOI 10.1007/s00415-013-7022-z
  49. Alsop DC, 2005, STROKE, V36, P746, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000158913.91058.93
  50. Balami JS, 2013, BRAIN, V136, P3528, DOI 10.1093/brain/awt201
  51. Powers WJ, 2015, STROKE, V46, P3020, DOI 10.1161/STR.0000000000000074
  52. Dawson SL, 2003, CEREBROVASC DIS, V16, P69, DOI 10.1159/000070118
  53. Rubiera M, 2005, STROKE, V36, P1452, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000170711.43405.81
  54. Albers GW, 2006, ANN NEUROL, V60, P508, DOI 10.1002/ana.20976
  55. Baizabal-Carvallo JF, 2012, J NEUROL, V259, P1045, DOI 10.1007/s00415-011-6295-3
  56. Bor-Seng-Shu E, 2012, NEUROSURG FOCUS, V32, DOI 10.3171/2011.10.FOCUS11251
  57. Liberati A, 2009, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V339, DOI 10.1136/bmj.b2700
  58. Sillanpaa Niko, 2011, Cerebrovasc Dis Extra, V1, P6, DOI 10.1159/000324324
  59. Uzuner N, 2013, BIOMED RES INT, DOI 10.1155/2013/265171