Re-Transplantation, Higher Creatinine Levels in Hepatitis C Virus Patients, and Donor Age Are Predictors of Mortality in Long-Term Analysis of Late Acute Rejection in Liver Transplantation

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
12
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2017
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
INT SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE, INC
Citação
ANNALS OF TRANSPLANTATION, v.22, p.9-16, 2017
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background: Late acute rejection (LAR) differs in its clinical and histological presentation and management from early acute rejection. This clinical entity is not completely understood; thus, we aimed to identify significant prognostic factors that can influence post-transplant survival in LAR patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and post-transplant survival of patients from a single center with a focus on late acute rejection. Material/Methods: From January 2002 to June 2013, all liver biopsies from patients with rejection were scored using the Banff criteria. The groups were compared, and simple and multiple logistic regression and survival curves were created. Results: A total of 779 liver transplants were performed; 585 patients with no rejections and 194 patients with rejections were analyzed. The overall incidence of LAR was 6.7%, and there was a higher prevalence of early acute cellular rejection than LAR. The mean time to LAR was 564 days (median 214 days, range 91-2642). LAR had a more severe grade (35.3%) than early acute rejection (23.5%). The survival rates were similar between both modalities for the long-term period. Worse mortality rates were observed in liver re-transplantation (HR 4.77; p<0.0001); in hepatitis C virus patients with increased creatinine levels (HR 22.48; p=0.016); and in donors > 41 years of age (OR 2.1; p=0.047) in a long-term analysis of LAR. Conclusions: Liver re-transplantation, higher creatinine levels in hepatitis C virus patients, and donor age were predictors of mortality in this long-term analysis of late acute rejection in liver transplantation.
Palavras-chave
Graft Rejection, Graft Survival, Liver Transplantation, Logistic Models, Survival Analysis
Referências
  1. Akamatsu N, 2006, WORLD J GASTROENTERO, V12, P6674
  2. Feng S, 2006, AM J TRANSPLANT, V6, P783, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01242.x
  3. Florman S, 2004, CLIN TRANSPLANT, V18, P152, DOI 10.1046/j.1399-0012.2003.00139.x
  4. Junge G, 2005, TRANSPLANT P, V37, P1716, DOI 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.04.005
  5. NACIF Lucas Souto, 2015, ABCD, arq. bras. cir. dig., V28, P212, DOI 10.1590/S0102-67202015000300017
  6. Nacif LS, 2014, CLINICS, V69, P745, DOI 10.6061/clinics/2014(11)07
  7. Neil DAH, 2001, TRANSPLANT P, V33, P1525, DOI 10.1016/S0041-1345(00)02582-3
  8. Ozbilgin M, 2015, TRANSPL P, V47, P1474, DOI 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.04.076
  9. Ramji A, 2002, LIVER TRANSPLANT, V8, P945, DOI 10.1053/jlts.2002.34969
  10. Sundaram SS, 2006, LIVER TRANSPLANT, V12, P58, DOI 10.1002/lt.20661
  11. Thurairajah PH, 2013, TRANSPLANTATION, V95, P955, DOI 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182845f6c
  12. Uemura T, 2008, CLIN TRANSPLANT, V22, P316, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2007.00788.x
  13. Wang GY, 2013, TRANSPL P, V45, P1198, DOI 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.10.008
  14. Wiesner RH, 2006, AM J TRANSPLANT, V6, P1609, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01382.x