A preliminary survey on the religious profile of Brazilian psychiatrists and their approach to patients' religiosity in clinical practice
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2016
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ROYAL COLL PSYCHIATRISTS
Autores
Citação
BJPSYCH OPEN, v.2, n.6, p.346-352, 2016
Resumo
Background Although there is evidence of a relationship between religion/spirituality and mental health, it remains unclear how Brazilian psychiatrists deal with the religion/spirituality of their patients. Aims To explore whether Brazilian psychiatrists enquire about religion/spirituality in their practice and whether their own beliefs influence their work. Method Four hundred and eighty-four Brazilian psychiatrists completed a cross-sectional survey on religion/spirituality and clinical practice. Results Most psychiatrists had a religious affiliation (67.4%) but more than half of the 484 participants (55.5%) did not usually enquire about patients' religion/spirituality. The most common reasons for not assessing patients' religion/spirituality were 'being afraid of exceeding the role of a doctor' (30.2%) and 'lack of training' (22.3%). Conclusions Very religious/spiritual psychiatrists were the most likely to ask about their patients' religion/spirituality. Training in how to deal with a patient's religiosity might help psychiatrists to develop better patient rapport and may contribute to the patient's quicker recovery. Copyright and usage (C) The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2016.
Palavras-chave
Referências
- American Psychiatric Association (APA) Committee on Religion and Psychiatry, 1990, AM J PSYCHIAT, V147, P542
- Baetz M, 2004, CAN J PSYCHIAT, V49, P265
- Banzato Cláudio Eduardo Muller, 2007, J. bras. psiquiatr., V56, P88, DOI 10.1590/S0047-20852007000200003
- Bonelli RM, 2013, J RELIG HEALTH, V52, P657, DOI 10.1007/s10943-013-9691-4
- Cordeiro Q., 2014, PSYCHE SPIRIT, V1, P2
- Cunningham CT, 2015, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12874-015-0016-z
- Curlin FA, 2006, MED CARE, V44, P446, DOI 10.1097/01.mlr.0000207434.12450.ef
- Curlin FA, 2007, PSYCHIAT SERV, V58, P1193, DOI 10.1176/appi.ps.58.9.1193
- Curlin FA, 2007, AM J PSYCHIAT, V164, P1825, DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06122088
- Curlin FA, 2007, NEW ENGL J MED, V356, P593, DOI 10.1056/NEJMsa065316
- Duarte GA, 2010, REV SAUDE PUBL, V44, P406, DOI 10.1590/s0034-89102010005000006
- Dura-Vila G, 2011, MENT HEALTH RELIG CU, V14, P53, DOI 10.1080/13674676.2010.495111
- Francis LJ, 1997, RELIGION, V27, P81, DOI 10.1006/reli.1996.0066
- Freud S., 1953, STANDARD EDITION COM, V21, P31
- Lucchetti ALG, 2016, CULT MED PSYCHIAT, V40, P404, DOI 10.1007/s11013-015-9478-z
- Harzing A. W., 1997, INT BUSINESS REV, V6, P641, DOI 10.1016/S0969-5931(97)00040-1
- Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica (IBGE), 2010, CENS DEM 2010 CAR GE
- Koenig Harold, 2012, HDB RELIG HLTH
- Koenig HG, 2009, CAN J PSYCHIAT, V54, P283
- Koenig HG, 2008, PSYCHIATR BULL, V32, P201, DOI 10.1192/pb.bp.108.019430
- Koenig Harold G., 2001, HDB RELIG HLTH
- Lawrence RM, 2007, INT PSYCHOGERIATR, V19, P962, DOI 10.1017/S1041610206004339
- Lee E, 2013, EVID-BASED COMPL ALT, DOI 10.1155/2013/280168
- Moreira-Almeida A, 2016, WORLD PSYCHIATRY, V15, P87, DOI 10.1002/wps.20304
- Moreira-Almeida A, 2014, REV BRAS PSIQUIATR, V36, P176, DOI 10.1590/1516-4446-2013-1255
- Moreira-Almeida A, 2011, REV BRAS PSIQUIATR, V33, pS21, DOI 10.1590/S1516-44462011000500004
- NEELEMAN J, 1995, BRIT J MED PSYCHOL, V68, P169
- NEELEMAN J, 1993, ACTA PSYCHIAT SCAND, V88, P420, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1993.tb03484.x
- Nulty DD, 2008, ASSESS EVAL HIGH EDU, V33, P301, DOI 10.1080/02602930701293231
- Office of National Statistics UK, REL ENGL WAL 2011
- Pirutinsky S, 2011, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V132, P401, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2011.03.015
- Robinson K, RELIG SPIRITUAL BELI
- Samano EST, 2005, EUR J CANCER CARE, V14, P143, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2005.00524.x
- Welgemoed MA, 2014, SAJP-S AFR J PSYCHI, V20, P140, DOI [10.7196/SAJP.619, 10.7196/sajp.619]