Arg72Pro TP53 polymorphism and cancer susceptibility: a comprehensive meta-analysis of 302 case-control studies

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
63
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2011
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
WILEY-BLACKWELL
Citação
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, v.129, n.4, p.920-930, 2011
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Arg72Pro is a common polymorphism in TP53, showing differences in its biological functions. Case-control studies have been performed to elucidate the role of Arg72Pro in cancer, although the results are conflicting and heterogeneous. Here, we analyzed pooled data from case-control studies to determine the role of Arg72Pro in different cancer sites. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of 302 case-control studies that analyzed Arg72Pro in cancer susceptibility. Odds ratios were estimated for different tumor sites using distinct genetic models, and the heterogeneity between studies was explored using I(2) values and meta-regression. We adopted quality criteria to classify the studies. Subgroup analyses were done for tumor sites according to ethnicity, histological, and anatomical sites. Results indicated that Arg72Pro is associated with higher susceptibility to cancer in some tumor sites, mainly hepatocarcinoma. For some tumor sites, quality of studies was associated with the size of genetic association, mainly in cervical, head and neck, gastric, and lung cancer. However, study quality did not explain the observed heterogeneity substantially. Meta-regression showed that ethnicity, allelic frequency and genotyping method were responsible for a substantial part of the heterogeneity observed. Our results suggest ethnicity and histological and anatomical sites may modulate the penetrance of Arg72Pro in cancer susceptibility. This meta-analysis denotes the importance for more studies with good quality and that the covariates responsible for heterogeneity should be controlled to obtain a more conclusive response about the function of Arg72Pro in cancer.
Palavras-chave
Arg72Pro, p53, meta-regression, heterogeneity, cancer susceptibility, meta-analysis, case-control
Referências
  1. Hong Y, 2005, CANCER RES, V65, P9582, DOI 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1460
  2. Stroup DF, 2000, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V283, P2008, DOI 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
  3. Zhou Y, 2007, INT J CANCER, V121, P1481, DOI 10.1002/ijc.22833
  4. Hainaut P, 2009, LANCET ONCOL, V10, P913, DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70198-6
  5. Hu N, 2003, CANCER DETECT PREV, V27, P132, DOI 10.1016/S0361-090X(03)00031-X
  6. Damin APS, 2006, CANCER DETECT PREV, V30, P523, DOI 10.1016/j.cdp.2006.09.007
  7. SCHEFFNER M, 1990, CELL, V63, P1129, DOI 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90409-8
  8. Sjalander A, 1996, HUM HERED, V46, P41, DOI 10.1159/000154324
  9. Achatz MIW, 2009, LANCET ONCOL, V10, P920, DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70089-0
  10. Higgins JPT, 2003, BRIT MED J, V327, P557, DOI 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
  11. Weston A, 1997, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V6, P105
  12. Petitjean A, 2007, ONCOGENE, V26, P2157, DOI 10.1038/sj.onc.1210302
  13. Sjalander A, 1996, CARCINOGENESIS, V17, P1313, DOI 10.1093/carcin/17.6.1313
  14. Pietsch EC, 2006, ONCOGENE, V25, P1602, DOI 10.1038/sj.onc.1209367
  15. Kalemi TG, 2005, CANCER LETT, V222, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.canlet.2004.11.025
  16. Yan LL, 2009, INT J CANCER, V125, P2903, DOI 10.1002/ijc.24603
  17. Tada M, 2001, CARCINOGENESIS, V22, P515, DOI 10.1093/carcin/22.3.515
  18. Olivier M, 2009, CANCER GENE THER, V16, P1, DOI 10.1038/cgt.2008.69
  19. Dumont P, 2003, NAT GENET, V33, P357, DOI 10.1038/ng1093
  20. Bergamaschi D, 2006, NAT GENET, V38, P1133, DOI 10.1038/ng1879
  21. Marin MC, 2000, NAT GENET, V25, P47
  22. Makni H, 2000, INT J CANCER, V87, P528, DOI 10.1002/1097-0215(20000815)87:4<528::AID-IJC11>3.3.CO;2-F
  23. Petitjean A, 2007, HUM MUTAT, V28, P622, DOI 10.1002/humu.20495
  24. Dakouras A, 2008, ANTICANCER RES, V28, P1039
  25. Storey A, 1998, NATURE, V393, P229
  26. Whibley C, 2009, NAT REV CANCER, V9, P95, DOI 10.1038/nrc2584
  27. Klug SJ, 2009, LANCET ONCOL, V10, P772, DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70187-1
  28. Haiman CA, 2006, NEW ENGL J MED, V354, P333, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa033250
  29. Baynes C, 2007, BREAST CANCER RES, V9, DOI 10.1186/bcr1669
  30. BECKMAN G, 1994, HUM HERED, V44, P266, DOI 10.1159/000154228
  31. Borenstein M, 2009, INTRO METAANALYSIS, P450
  32. BROSH R, 2009, NAT REV CANCER, V10, P701
  33. Buyru N, 2003, ONCOL REP, V10, P711
  34. Costa S, 2008, BMC CANCER, V8, DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-8-32
  35. Egger M, 2001, SYSTEMATIC REV HLTH, p[xviii, 487]
  36. Francisco G, 2008, EUR J HUM GENET, V16, P724, DOI 10.1038/ejhg.2008.6
  37. Gaudet MM, 2008, BREAST CANCER RES TR, V108, P93, DOI 10.1007/s10549-007-9573-0
  38. Gochhait S, 2007, BREAST CANCER RES, V9, DOI 10.1186/bcr1780
  39. Hrstka R, 2009, J CELL MOL MED, V13, P440, DOI 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00634.x
  40. Huang Xin-En, 2003, Breast Cancer, V10, P307, DOI 10.1007/BF02967650
  41. Ioannidis JPA, 2008, INT J EPIDEMIOL, V37, P120, DOI 10.1093/ije/dym159
  42. Koushik A, 2004, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V13, P11, DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-083-3
  43. Minelli C, 2009, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V170, P1333, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwp350
  44. Murata M, 1996, CARCINOGENESIS, V17, P261, DOI 10.1093/carcin/17.2.261
  45. Nadji SA, 2007, LUNG CANCER, V56, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.12.006
  46. Popanda O, 2007, LUNG CANCER, V55, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.09.006
  47. SHAO Y, 2008, DIS ESOPHAGUS, V2, P139
  48. Szymanowska A, 2006, LUNG CANCER-J IASLC, V52, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.12.007
  49. Tan XL, 2007, PHARMACOGENET GENOM, V17, P639, DOI 10.1097/FPC.0b013e3280d5121c
  50. Yang WJ, 2008, MOL CARCINOGEN, V47, P100, DOI 10.1002/mc.20368