Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/32008
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
dc.contributor.authorLAY, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorKAWOHL, Wolfram
dc.contributor.authorROESSLER, Wulf
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-30T13:51:39Z
dc.date.available2019-05-30T13:51:39Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationFRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, v.10, article ID 120, 12p, 2019
dc.identifier.issn1664-0640
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/32008
dc.description.abstractObjective: This prospective study addresses risk factors of compulsory re-admission focusing on the role of the patient's subjective symptom distress and perceived social support, based on comprehensive patient and external (clinicians, study staff) assessments. Methods: Of the baseline sample, 168 (71%) patients with serious mental disorders, who had been compulsorily admitted to psychiatric inpatient care, were followed over 24 months after discharge within the framework of a RCT. Results: During this time 36% had compulsory re-admissions; risk was highest immediately after discharge. Regression models identified a history of previous compulsory hospitalisations and compulsory admission due to endangerment of others as the predictors most strongly associated with the outcome. Patients diagnosed with a psychotic disorder or an emotionally instable or combined personality disorder were most likely to experience compulsory re-hospitalisation, with poor response to treatment further significantly increasing the risk. The patient ratings of subjective symptom distress or perceived social support had no predictive value for compulsory re-admission, and this study did not provide evidence for a significant prognostic relevance of sociodemographic background factors. Conclusions: The present findings suggest that within individual-level variables disease-related factors are essentially the strongest predictors, but including the patients' subjective perspective does not enhance the prediction of compulsory re-hospitalisation. The psychiatric treatment of patients with recurrent and often challenging behavioural problems, at the more severe end of the spectrum of mental disorders, deserves closer attention if the use of compulsory hospitalisation is to be reduced.eng
dc.description.sponsorshipZurich Program for Sustainable Development of Mental Health Services
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFRONTIERS MEDIA SAeng
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Psychiatry
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectcompulsory psychiatric hospitalisationeng
dc.subjectsevere mental disorderseng
dc.subjectpsychotic disordereng
dc.subjectpersonality disordereng
dc.subjectrisk factorseng
dc.subjectprospective studyeng
dc.subject.otherservice receipt inventoryeng
dc.subject.othermental-healtheng
dc.subject.otherinvoluntary admissioneng
dc.subject.othersocial supporteng
dc.subject.otherfollow-upeng
dc.subject.otheramsterdameng
dc.subject.otherriskeng
dc.subject.otherinstrumenteng
dc.subject.othereuropeeng
dc.subject.otheracteng
dc.titlePredictors of Compulsory Re-admission to Psychiatric Inpatient Careeng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.rights.holderCopyright FRONTIERS MEDIA SAeng
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00120
dc.identifier.pmid30949072
dc.subject.wosPsychiatryeng
dc.type.categoryoriginal articleeng
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioneng
hcfmusp.author.externalLAY, Barbara:Psychiat Dienste Aargau AG, Klin Psychiat & Psychotherapie, Windisch, Switzerland
hcfmusp.author.externalKAWOHL, Wolfram:Psychiat Dienste Aargau AG, Klin Psychiat & Psychotherapie, Windisch, Switzerland; Univ Hosp Psychiat Zurich, Dept Psychiat Psychotherapy & Psychosomat, Zurich, Switzerland
hcfmusp.description.articlenumber120
hcfmusp.description.volume10
hcfmusp.origemWOS
hcfmusp.origem.idWOS:000461852700001
hcfmusp.origem.id2-s2.0-85066455227
hcfmusp.publisher.cityLAUSANNEeng
hcfmusp.publisher.countrySWITZERLANDeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceArmgart C, 2013, PSYCHIAT PRAX, V40, P278, DOI 10.1055/s-0033-1343159eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBalducci PM, 2017, PSYCHIAT DANUB, V29, P490, DOI 10.24869/psyd.2017.490eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBauer A, 2007, INT J LAW PSYCHIAT, V30, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.02.002eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBhui K, 2003, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V182, P105, DOI 10.1192/bjp.182.2.105eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceChisholm D, 2000, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V177, pS28, DOI 10.1192/bjp.177.39.s28eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCougnard A, 2004, SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID, V39, P804, DOI 10.1007/s00127-004-0826-5eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencede Stefano A, 2008, INT J MENT HEALTH, V37, P10, DOI 10.2753/IMH0020-7411370301eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFreyberger HJ, 2008, FORTSCHR NEUROL PSYC, V76, P106, DOI 10.1055/s-2007-996172eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGassmann J, 2011, WIRKSAMKEIT RECHTSSCeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHatling T, 2002, J MENTAL HLTH, V11, P623, DOI [10.1080/09638230021000058184, DOI 10.1080/09638230021000058184]eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHung YY, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0186768eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHustoft K, 2013, INT J LAW PSYCHIAT, V36, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.01.006eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceJuckel G, 2015, PSYCHIAT PRAX, V42, P133, DOI 10.1055/s-0034-1369866eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKaltiala-Heino R, 2010, SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID, V45, P785, DOI 10.1007/s00127-009-0116-3eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKeown P, 2011, BRIT MED J, V343, DOI 10.1136/bmj.d3736eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLambert MJ, 1996, CLIN PSYCHOL PSYCHOT, V3, P249, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0879(199612)3:4<249::AID-CPP106>3.0.CO;2-Seng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLay B, 2018, PSYCHOL MED, V48, P849, DOI 10.1017/S0033291717002239eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLay B, 2011, EUR PSYCHIAT, V26, P244, DOI 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2010.11.007eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLay B, 2012, BMC PSYCHIATRY, V12, DOI 10.1186/1471-244X-12-136eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMartin DJ, 2000, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V68, P438, DOI 10.1037//0022-006X.68.3.438eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMeise U, 2011, PSYCHIAT PRAX, V38, P161, DOI 10.1055/s-0030-1266104eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMulder C L, 2006, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, V150, P319eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMulder CL, 2005, PSYCHIAT SERV, V56, P452, DOI 10.1176/appi.ps.56.4.452eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePriebe S, 2005, BRIT MED J, V330, P123, DOI 10.1136/bmj.38296.611215.AEeng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePriebe S, 2011, EUR ARCH PSY CLIN N, V261, P377, DOI 10.1007/s00406-010-0179-xeng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePriebe S, 2009, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V194, P49, DOI 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.052266eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRoick C, 2001, PSYCHIAT PRAX, V28, pS84eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSalize HJ, 2004, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V184, P163, DOI 10.1192/bjp.184.2.163eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSALKOVSKIS PM, 1985, BEHAV RES THER, V23, P571, DOI 10.1016/0005-7967(85)90105-6eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSchulz U, 2003, DIAGNOSTICA, V49, P73, DOI 10.1026//0012-1924.49.2.73eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSchwarzer R, 2002, SOZIALE INTEGRATIONeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSetkowski K, 2016, INT J SOC PSYCHIATR, V62, P578, DOI 10.1177/0020764016655182eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSteinert Tilman, 2014, Front Public Health, V2, P141, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00141eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceTurner R. J., 2010, HDB STUDY MENTAL HLT, P200eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceUmama-Agada E, 2018, INT J LAW PSYCHIAT, V57, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.12.007eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencevan der Post L, 2012, INT J SOC PSYCHIATR, V58, P374, DOI 10.1177/0020764011399970eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencevan der Post L, 2008, BMC PSYCHIATRY, V8, DOI 10.1186/1471-244X-8-35eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencevan der Post LFM, 2016, INT J MENT HEALTH, V45, P105, DOI 10.1080/00207411.2016.1156942eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencevan der Post LFM, 2012, PSYCHIAT SERV, V63, P577, DOI 10.1176/appi.ps.201100080eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceVeiel HO, 1992, MEANING MEASUREMENTeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWebber M, 2004, SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID, V39, P1000, DOI 10.1007/s00127-004-0836-3eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWynn R, 2018, INT J MENT HEALTH SY, V12, DOI 10.1186/s13033-018-0189-zeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceXiao JG, 2004, AUST NZ J PSYCHIAT, V38, P613, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1614.2004.01429.xeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceZinkler M, 2002, ACTA PSYCHIAT SCAND, V106, P3, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.02268.xeng
dc.description.indexPubMedeng
hcfmusp.citation.scopus15-
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-03-29-
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/27
LIM/27 - Laboratório de Neurociências


Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art_LAY_Predictors_of_Compulsory_Readmission_to_Psychiatric_Inpatient_Care_2019.PDFpublishedVersion (English)467.77 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.