Inversion of traditional gender roles and intimate partner violence against pregnant women

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
2
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2020
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
CADERNOS SAUDE PUBLICA
Autores
RIBEIRO, Marizelia Rodrigues Costa
SILVA, Antonio Augusto Moura da
MURRAY, Joseph
ALVES, Maria Teresa Seabra Soares de Britt e
BATISTA, Rosangela Fernardes Lucena
RODRIGUES, Livia dos Santos
BETTIOL, Heloisa
CAVALLI, Ricardo de Carvalho
BARBIERI, Marco Antonio
Citação
CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, v.36, n.5, article ID e00113919, 16p, 2020
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
This study analyzed the association between the inversion of traditional gender roles and exclusive psychological and physical/sexual intimate partner violence, in a cross-sectional study of Brazilian pregnant women, identified through prenatal services in the municipalities of Sao Luis, Maranhao State (n = 992) and Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo State (n = 943). The pregnant women ranged from 12 to 45 years. Inversion of traditional gender roles was assessed by calculating differences in age, education and occupation between pregnant women and their co-residing intimate partners and identifying the largest contribution to family income. The conceptual model was tested with structural equation modeling and showed acceptable fit. The prevalence of any type of intimate partner violence was 29.8% in Sao Luis and 20.1% in Ribeirao Preto. In both municipalities, pregnant women were more likely to suffer exclusive psychological and physical/sexual violence when they had the highest income in the family (p < 0.005). In Sao Luis, physical/sexual violence was more common among women who were better educated than their partners (standardized coefficient, SC = -0.466; p = 0.007). In Ribeirao Preto, exclusive psychological violence was more frequent among women who had lower status occupations than their partners (SC = 0.236; p = 0.004). Inversion of traditional gender roles is associated with exclusive psychological and physical/sexual violence against pregnant women by their co-residing intimate partners. These findings suggest that women's empowerment at an individual level does not necessarily relieve them of intimate partner abuse in social contexts where traditional gender norms persist.
Palavras-chave
Gender-Based Violence, Interpersonal Relations, Intimate Partner Violence, Structural Models, Pregnancy
Referências
  1. Abramsky T, 2011, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V11, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-109
  2. Ackerson LK, 2008, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V98, P507, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2007.113738
  3. American Psychological Association Task Force on Socioeconomic Status, 2007, REP APA TASK FORC SO
  4. Antai D, 2014, GLOB PUBLIC HEALTH, V9, P808, DOI 10.1080/17441692.2014.917195
  5. Antai D, 2011, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V11, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-511
  6. Associacao Brasileira de Empresas de Pesqui- sas, 2010, CRIT CLASS EC BRAS
  7. Bjelland H., 2014, SOS TIDSSKR, V22, P51
  8. Breiding M. J., 2015, INTIMATE PARTNER VIO
  9. Brown T., 2015, CONFIRMATORY FACTOR
  10. Brownridge DA, 2011, VIOLENCE AGAINST WOM, V17, P858, DOI 10.1177/1077801211412547
  11. Byrne B. M., 2012, STRUCTURAL EQUATION
  12. Cohen S., 2000, SOCIAL SUPPORT MEASU
  13. Flake DF, 2005, VIOLENCE AGAINST WOM, V11, P353, DOI 10.1177/1077801204272129
  14. Heise LL, 2015, LANCET GLOB HEALTH, V3, pE332, DOI 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00013-3
  15. Inter-Agency Standing Committee, 2015, GUID INT GEND BAS VI
  16. Jewkes R, 2002, LANCET, V359, P1423, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08357-5
  17. Kline RB, 2016, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE
  18. Krug EG, 2002, LANCET, V360, P1083, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11133-0
  19. Luke N, 2007, VIOLENCE AGAINST WOM, V13, P5, DOI 10.1177/1077801206295112
  20. Programa das Nacoes Unidas para o Desen- volvimento
  21. Instituto de Pesquisa Economica Aplicada, ATL DES HUM BRAS
  22. Ribeiro MBN, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0102187
  23. Saffioti H, 2014, VIOLENCIA GENERO POD
  24. Schraiber LB, 2005, VIOLENCIA DOI NAO DI
  25. Schraiber LB, 2010, REV SAUDE PUBL, V44, P658, DOI 10.1590/S0034-89102010000400009
  26. Semahegn A, 2015, REPROD HEALTH, V12, DOI 10.1186/s12978-015-0072-1
  27. SHERBOURNE CD, 1991, SOC SCI MED, V32, P705, DOI 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90150-B
  28. Teixeira M, 2014, S AM J HERPETOL, V9, P62, DOI 10.2994/SAJH-D-14-00004.1
  29. Umubyeyi A, 2014, BMC WOMENS HEALTH, V14, DOI 10.1186/1472-6874-14-99
  30. United Nations, 2014, REV APPR IMPL BEIJ D
  31. Walby S., 1990, THEORIZING PATRIARCH
  32. Wang J., 2012, STRUCTURAL EQUATION
  33. WHO, 2005, WHO MULT STUD WOM HL
  34. Word Health Organization, 2000, PREV INT PARTN SEX V
  35. World Health Organization, 2000, EST MULT SOBR SAUD M
  36. World Health Organization London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 2013, GLOB REG EST VIOL WO